Aboveground carbon stocks (AGCs) in forests play an important role in understanding carbon cycle processes. The global forestry sector has been working to find fast and accurate methods to estimate forest AGCs and implement dynamic monitoring. The aim of this study was to explore the effects of backpack LiDAR and UAV multispectral imagery on AGC estimation for two tree species (Larix gmelinii and Betula platyphylla) and to emphasize the accuracy of the models used. We estimated the AGC of Larix gmelinii and B. platyphylla forests using multivariate stepwise linear regression and random forest regression models using backpack LiDAR data and multi-source remote sensing data, respectively, and compared them with measured data. This study revealed that (1) the diameter at breast height (DBH) extracted from backpack LiDAR and vegetation indices (RVI and GNDVI) extracted from UAV multispectral imagery proved to be extremely effective in modeling for estimating AGCs, significantly improving the accuracy of the model. (2) Random forest regression models estimated AGCs with higher precision (Xing’an larch R² = 0.95, RMSE = 3.99; white birch R² = 0.96, RMSE = 3.45) than multiple linear regression models (Xing’an larch R² = 0.92, RMSE = 6.15; white birch R² = 0.96, RMSE = 3.57). (3) After combining backpack LiDAR and UAV multispectral data, the estimation accuracy of AGCs for both tree species (Xing’an larch R² = 0.95, white birch R² = 0.96) improved by 2% compared to using backpack LiDAR alone (Xing’an larch R² = 0.93, white birch R² = 0.94).

The correct estimation of forest aboveground carbon stocks (AGCs) allows for an accurate assessment of the carbon sequestration potential of forest ecosystems, which is important for in-depth studies of the regional ecological environment and global climate change. How to estimate forest AGCs quickly and accurately and realize dynamic monitoring has been a hot topic of research in the forestry field worldwide. LiDAR and remote sensing optical imagery can be used to monitor forest resources, enabling the simultaneous acquisition of forest structural properties and spectral information. A high-density LiDAR-based point cloud cannot only reveal stand-scale forest parameters but can also be used to extract single wood-scale forest parameters. However, there are multiple forest parameter estimation model problems, so it is especially important to choose appropriate variables and models to estimate forest AGCs. In this study, we used a Duraer coniferous forest as the study area and combined LiDAR, multispectral images, and measured data to establish multiple linear regression models and multiple power regression models to estimate forest AGCs. We selected the best model for accuracy evaluation and mapped the spatial distribution of AGC density. We found that (1) the highest accuracy of the multiple multiplicative power regression model was obtained for the estimated AGC (R² = 0.903, RMSE = 10.91 Pg) based on the LiDAR-estimated DBH; the predicted AGC values were in the range of 4.1–279.12 kg C. (2) The highest accuracy of the multiple multiplicative power regression model was obtained by combining the normalized vegetation index (NDVI) with the predicted AGC based on the DBH estimated by LiDAR (R² = 0.906, RMSE = 10.87 Pg); the predicted AGC values were in the range of 3.93–449.07 kg C. (3) The LiDAR-predicted AGC values and the combined LiDAR and optical image-predicted AGC values agreed with the field AGCs.

Discrete point cloud data from unmanned aerial vehicle laser scanning (UAV-LS) can provide information on the three-dimensional structure of a forest, the leaf area index (LAI) at the landscape or sample plot scales, the distribution of the vertical forest structure at a fine resolution, and other information. The retrieved parameters, however, may be affected in a non-negligible way by the inclusion of scan angle information. In this study, we introduced a relational model that encompasses the angular effect, predicted the mechanism of this effect, and extracted the vegetation structure indices that the angular effect might influence. Second, we quantified the direct and indirect effects, particularly the magnitude of the angular effect in broadleaf forests, and used mediated effects to investigate the components and processes that influence the angular effect. The findings demonstrate that some of the differences between the LAIe extracted by UAV-LS and the Decagon LAIe considering the angular effect of UAV-LS can be explained by adjusting physical LiDAR parameters (aerial height, laser divergence fraction, and scanning angle) and vertical forest structure variables. Along continuous and closed forest vertical gradients, the indirect angle impact is negative for the upper canopy and positive for the understory. Three-dimensional vegetation measurements were created using multiangle LiDAR data. In conclusion, this article (1) addresses the angular effect in UAV-LS; and (2) discusses how the angular effect affects 3D vegetation parameters such as LAIe, demonstrates the nonlinear trend of the angular effect, and demonstrates how multiangle LiDAR data can be used to obtain 3D vegetation parameters. This study serves as a reference for reducing the uncertainty in simulations of the angular effect and vegetation light transmission, in addition to the uncertainty in analyses of the vegetation characteristics determined by UAV-LS (e.g., the uncertainty of LAIe).