Jessica Winter

Dr. Jessica Winter


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
16 October 2009 in Advanced Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NKNicholas A. Kotov
Nicholas A. Kotov
JWJessica Winter
Jessica Winter
ICIsaac P. Clements
Isaac P. Clements
EJEdward Jan
Edward Jan
BTBrian P. Timko
Brian P. Timko
LBLaura Ballerini
Laura Ballerini

6 September 2013 in ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SRShreyas S. Rao
Shreyas S. Rao
JDJessica DeJesus
Jessica DeJesus
ASAaron R. Short
Aaron R. Short
JOJose J. Otero
Jose J. Otero
ASAtom Sarkar
Atom Sarkar
JWJessica Winter
Jessica Winter

1 July 2013 in Biomaterials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SRShreyas S. Rao
Shreyas S. Rao
MNMark T. Nelson
Mark T. Nelson
RXRuipeng Xue
Ruipeng Xue
JDJessica K. DeJesus
Jessica K. DeJesus
MVMariano S Viapiano
Mariano S Viapiano
JWJessica Winter
Jessica Winter

3 September 2015 in Journal of Materials Chemistry B
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ASAaron R. Short
Aaron R. Short
DKDeepthi Koralla
Deepthi Koralla
ADAmeya Deshmukh
Ameya Deshmukh
BWBenjamin Wissel
Benjamin Wissel
BSBenjamin Stocker
Benjamin Stocker
JWJessica Winter
Jessica Winter
Bone defects can originate from a variety of causes, including trauma, cancer, congenital deformity, and surgical reconstruction. Success of the current “gold standard” treatment (i.e., autologous bone grafts) is greatly influenced by insufficient or inappropriate bone stock. There is thus a critical need for the development of new, engineered materials for bone repair. This review describes the use of natural and synthetic hydrogels as scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. We discuss many of the advantages that hydrogels offer as bone repair materials, including their potential for osteoconductivity, biodegradability, controlled growth factor release, and cell encapsulation. We also discuss the use of hydrogels in composite devices with metals, ceramics, or polymers. These composites are useful because of the low mechanical moduli of hydrogels. Finally, the potential for thermosetting and photo-cross-linked hydrogels as three-dimensionally (3D) printed, patient-specific devices is highlighted. Three-dimensional printing enables controlled spatial distribution of scaffold materials, cells, and growth factors. Hydrogels, especially natural hydrogels present in bone matrix, have great potential to augment existing bone tissue engineering devices for the treatment of critical size bone defects.

1 January 2007 in Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JWJessica Winter
Jessica Winter
SCStuart F. Cogan
Stuart F. Cogan
JRJoseph F. Rizzo
Joseph F. Rizzo
Blindness from retinal diseases, including age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and retinitis pigmentosa (RP), usually causes a significant decline in quality of life for affected patients. Currently there is no cure for these conditions. However, over the last decade, several groups have been developing retinal prostheses which hopefully will provide some degree of improved visual function to these patients. Several such devices are now in clinical trials. Unfortunately, the possibility of electrode or tissue damage limits excitation schemes to those that may be employed with electrodes that have relatively low charge densities. Further, the excitation thresholds that have been required to achieve vision to date, in general, are relatively high. This may result in part from poor apposition between neurons and the stimulating electrodes and is confounded by the effects of the photoreceptor loss, which initiates other pathology in the surviving retinal tissue. The combination of these and other factors imposes a restriction on the pixel density that can be used for devices that actively deliver electrical stimulation to the retina. The resultant use of devices with relatively low pixel densities presumably will limit the degree of visual resolution that can be obtained with these devices. Further increases in pixel density, and therefore increased visual acuity, will necessitate either improved electrode-tissue biocompatibility or lower stimulation thresholds. To meet this challenge, innovations in materials and devices have been proposed. Here, we review the types of retinal prostheses investigated, the extent of their current biocompatibility and future improvements designed to surmount these limitations.

1 January 2009 in Frontiers in Neuroengineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SRShreyas S Rao
Shreyas S Rao
JWJessica Winter
Jessica Winter
Adhesion molecules (AMs) represent one class of biomolecules that promote central nervous system regeneration. These tethered molecules provide cues to regenerating neurons that recapitulate the native brain environment. Improving cell adhesive potential of non-adhesive biomaterials is therefore a common goal in neural tissue engineering. This review discusses common AMs used in neural biomaterials and the mechanism of cell attachment to these AMs. Methods to modify materials with AMs are discussed and compared. Additionally, patterning of AMs for achieving specific neuronal responses is explored.