Previous research has shown daily salt intakes in Turkey to be far above the recommended limits. Knowing the sources of dietary salt could form a basis for preventive strategies aimed towards salt reduction. This study aimed to investigate dietary sources of salt in Turkey. A sub-group (n = 657) was selected from the PatenT2 study population, which represented the urban and rural areas of 4 major cities (Ankara, Istanbul, Izmir, and Konya). A questionnaire inquiring about sociodemographic characteristics, medical histories, detailed histories of diet, and salt consumption was completed. Participants were asked to collect a 24-h urine sample and to record their food intake (dietary recall) on the same day. Of 925 participants selected, 657 (71%) provided accurate 24-h urine collections, based on creatinine excretion data. The mean daily 24-h urinary sodium excretion was 252.0 ± 92.2 mmol/day, equal to daily salt intake of 14.8 ± 5.4 g. Of the 657 participants with accurate 24-h urine collections, 464 (70%) provided fully completed dietary recalls. Among these 464 participants, there was a significant difference between the 24-h urinary sodium excretion-based salt intake estimation (14.5 ± 5.1 g/day) and the dietary recall-based salt intake estimation (12.0 ± 7.0 g/day) (p < 0.001). On the other hand, a positive correlation was obtained between the dietary recall-based daily salt intake and 24-h urinary sodium excretion-based daily salt intake (r = 0.277, p < 0.001). Bread was the main source of salt (34%) followed by salt added during cooking and preparing food before serving (30%), salt from various processed foods (21%), and salt added at the table during food consumption (11%). Conclusively, this study confirmed a very high salt intake of the adult population in four major cities in Turkey. The present findings support the emerging salt reduction strategy in Turkey by promoting lower salt content in baked bread, and less salt use in habitual food preparation and during food consumption in the home.

Background: Coronavirus Disease‐19 (COVID‐19) has high mortality in kidney transplant recipients (KTR), and vaccination against severe acute respiratory syndrome‐coronavirus‐2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) is vital for this population. Although the humoral response to messenger RNA vaccines was shown to be impaired in KTR, there is a lack of data regarding the antibody response to inactivated vaccines. We investigated the antibody response to two consequent doses of the inactivated SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccine (CoronaVac; Sinovac Biotech, China).Methods: A total of 118 patients from two centers were included. The levels of anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 immunoglobulin‐G antibodies against the nucleocapsid and spike antigens were determined with enzyme immunoassay (DIA.PRO; Milano, Italy) before the vaccine and one month after the second dose of the vaccine. Thirty‐three patients were excluded due to antibody positivity in the serum samples obtained before vaccination.Results: Eighty‐five patients, 47 of whom were female, with a mean age of 46 ± 12, were included in the statistical analysis. The maintenance immunosuppressive therapy comprised tacrolimus (88.2%), mycophenolate (63.6%), and low‐dose steroids (95.3%) in the majority of the patients. After a median of 31 days following the second dose of the vaccine, only 16 (18.8%) patients developed an antibody response. The median (IQR) antibody level was 52.5 IU/ml (21.5–96). Age (48 vs. 38, p = .005) and serum creatinine levels (1.14 vs. 0.91, p = .04) were higher in non‐responders and were also found to be independently associated with the antibody response (odds ratio (OR): 0.93, p = 0.012 and 0.15, p = 0.045, respectively) in multivariate analysis.Conclusion: In this study, we found the antibody response to the inactivated vaccine to be considerably low (18.8%) in KTR. Increased age and impaired renal function were associated with worse antibody response. Based on the knowledge that mRNA vaccines yield better humoral responses, this special population might be considered for additional doses of mRNA vaccination.

Home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM), which integrates patients into their treatment program, is a self-management tool. The prevalence of home sphygmomanometer ownership and patient compliance with HBPM guidelines are not well known, especially in developing and underdeveloped countries. The aims of this study were to measure the prevalence of home sphygmomanometer ownership among hypertensive subjects through a nationwide field survey (PatenT2), to investigate the validation of sphygmomanometers and consistency of the user arm circumference and cuff size of the upper-arm device owned, as well as to compare blood pressure (BP) readings between hypertensive subjects who have or do not have a sphygmomanometer. Sample selection was based on a multistratified proportional sampling procedure to select a nationally representative sample of the adult population (n = 5437). Of 1650 hypertensive subjects, 332 (20.1%) owned a device, but the percentage of patients who owned a sphygmomanometer was 28.8% among patients who were aware of their hypertension (260/902). The usage of wrist devices and nonvalidated devices is common, and selection of an appropriate cuff size is ignored. Linear-regression analysis showed that owning a BP monitor is associated with decreases of 3.7 mmHg and 2.8 mmHg for systolic and diastolic BPs, respectively. Many patients do not own a sphygmomanometer. The decrease of systolic and diastolic BPs among BP monitor owners is a striking finding. The implementation of a hypertension care program consisting of sphygmomanometer reimbursement and training of patients in its use for HBPM might be cost-effective.

Joint Diseases and Related Surgery (JDRS), the official journal of the Turkish Joint Diseases Foundation, is an international, peer-reviewed, immediate open access journal. All published articles in JDRS has been free for everyone, without embargo, since 1990.

Background/Objectives: Kidney transplantation remains the most effective treatment for patients with end-stage kidney disease, increasing both survival and quality of life. There are concerns regarding the long-term outcomes of donors in developing countries, as kidney transplants are predominantly performed from living donors. This study was conducted to evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes of living kidney donors, with a particular focus on kidney and cardiovascular health. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 232 individuals who underwent donor nephrectomy between January 2011 and November 2022. Cardiovascular events, mortality, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, and newly onset diabetes were assessed. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) values were employed to monitor kidney function over time. Results: Living kidney donors were monitored for a median of 6 years (IQR: 4–9 years). During the follow-up period, 18.9% of donors experienced a decline in eGFR to below 60 mL/min/1.73 m²; however, none progressed to end-stage kidney disease. Of the cohort, 20 (8.6%) had newly onset proteinuria and none had proteinuria before transplantation. Although there were no recorded deaths from cardiovascular causes, 4.3% of donors experienced major adverse cardiac events. 12.3% of donors had newly diagnosed hypertension following transplantation, and 20.2% of donors had hypertension overall. Lower baseline eGFR, treated as a continuous variable in the logistic regression model, was independently associated with a higher likelihood of post-donation eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m² (OR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.88–0.94; p < 0.001). Post donation proteinuria (OR: 6.61; 95% CI: 1.98–22.07, p: 0.002) was also identified as independent risk factors for decline in eGFR to below 60 mL/min/1.73 m². Diabetes mellitus was found to be a significant predictor of newly onset hypertension. Conclusions: A considerable percentage of the donors experienced gradual deterioration in kidney function, even though none of them developed kidney failure necessitating dialysis. The prevalence of obesity and chronic kidney disease was higher post-donation compared to the general population, indicating the need for structured long-term monitoring.