Andrew J Saykin

Dr. Andrew J Saykin

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

41Years (1986-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
28 February 2019 in Nature Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BKBrian W. Kunkle
Brian W. Kunkle
T(The European Alzheimer’s Disease Initiative (Eadi)
The European Alzheimer’s Disease Initiative (Eadi)
BGBenjamin Grenier-Boley
Benjamin Grenier-Boley
RSRebecca Sims
Rebecca Sims
JBJoshua C. Bis
Joshua C. Bis
MPMargaret A. Pericak-Vance
Margaret A. Pericak-Vance

2 May 2014 in Alzheimer's & Dementia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FJFrank Jessen
Frank Jessen
RARebecca E. Amariglio
Rebecca E. Amariglio
MBMartin van Boxtel
Martin van Boxtel
MBMonique M. B. Breteler
Monique M. B. Breteler
MCMathieu Ceccaldi
Mathieu Ceccaldi
SGSubjective Cognitive Decline Initiative (SCD‐I) Working Group
Subjective Cognitive Decline Initiative (SCD‐I) Working Group

3 April 2011 in Nature Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ANAdam C Naj
Adam C Naj
GJGyungah Jun
Gyungah Jun
GBGary W Beecham
Gary W Beecham
LWLi-San Wang
Li-San Wang
BVBadri Narayan Vardarajan
Badri Narayan Vardarajan
GSGerard D Schellenberg
Gerard D Schellenberg
Gerard Schellenberg and colleagues report a genome-wide association study of late-onset Alzheimer's disease (LOAD), as part of the Alzheimer Disease Genetics Consortium. They identify common variants in MS4A4/MS4A6E, CD2AP, CD33 and EPHA1 associated with LOAD. The Alzheimer Disease Genetics Consortium (ADGC) performed a genome-wide association study of late-onset Alzheimer disease using a three-stage design consisting of a discovery stage (stage 1) and two replication stages (stages 2 and 3). Both joint analysis and meta-analysis approaches were used. We obtained genome-wide significant results at MS4A4A (rs4938933; stages 1 and 2, meta-analysis P (PM) = 1.7 × 10−9, joint analysis P (PJ) = 1.7 × 10−9; stages 1, 2 and 3, PM = 8.2 × 10−12), CD2AP (rs9349407; stages 1, 2 and 3, PM = 8.6 × 10−9), EPHA1 (rs11767557; stages 1, 2 and 3, PM = 6.0 × 10−10) and CD33 (rs3865444; stages 1, 2 and 3, PM = 1.6 × 10−9). We also replicated previous associations at CR1 (rs6701713; PM = 4.6 × 10−10, PJ = 5.2 × 10−11), CLU (rs1532278; PM = 8.3 × 10−8, PJ = 1.9 × 10−8), BIN1 (rs7561528; PM = 4.0 × 10−14, PJ = 5.2 × 10−14) and PICALM (rs561655; PM = 7.0 × 10−11, PJ = 1.0 × 10−10), but not at EXOC3L2, to late-onset Alzheimer's disease susceptibility1,2,3.

17 July 2017 in Nature Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RSRebecca Sims
Rebecca Sims
SLSven J van der Lee
Sven J van der Lee
ANAdam C Naj
Adam C Naj
CBCéline Bellenguez
Céline Bellenguez
NBNandini Badarinarayan
Nandini Badarinarayan
GSGerard D Schellenberg
Gerard D Schellenberg

1 July 1991 in Archives of General Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ASAndrew J Saykin
Andrew J Saykin
RGRuben C. Gur
Ruben C. Gur
RGRaquel E. Gur
Raquel E. Gur
PMP. David Mozley
P. David Mozley
LMLyn H. Mozley
Lyn H. Mozley
PSPaul Stafiniak
Paul Stafiniak
• Unmedicated schizophrenic patients (according toDSM-III-Rcriteria) (n = 36) and age-matched normal controls (n = 36), balanced for parental socioeconomic status, were administered a battery of standardized neuropsychological tests. Patients showed generalized impairment relative to controls and a selective deficit in memory and learning compared with other functions. Selective impairment was not found on tests related to frontal system function (abstraction, verbal fluency, and motor). The observed pattern is consistent with greater involvement of the temporal-hippocampal system, against the background of diffuse dysfunction. Although impairment in memory and learning has been reported, the selectivity and relative severity compared with other behavioral functions have not been recognized. The specificity of this profile merits further examination. These findings lend support to the hypothesized importance of the temporal-hippocampal region in understanding the pathophysiology of schizophrenia.

20 March 2020 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KGKatrina Grasby
Katrina Grasby
NJNeda Jahanshad
Neda Jahanshad
JPJodie Painter
Jodie Painter
LCLucía Colodro Conde
Lucía Colodro Conde
JBJanita Bralten
Janita Bralten
EGEnhancing NeuroImaging Genetics through Meta-Analysis Consortium (ENIGMA)—Genetics working group
Enhancing NeuroImaging Genetics through Meta-Analysis Consortium (ENIGMA)—Genetics working group
INTRODUCTION: The cerebral cortex underlies our complex cognitive capabilities. Variations in human cortical surface area and thickness are associated with neurological, psychological, and behavioral traits and can be measured in vivo by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Studies in model organisms have identified genes that influence cortical structure, but little is known about common genetic variants that affect human cortical structure. RATIONALE: To identify genetic variants associated with human cortical structure at both global and regional levels, we conducted a genome-wide association meta-analysis of brain MRI data from 51,665 individuals across 60 cohorts. We analyzed the surface area and average thickness of the whole cortex and 34 cortical regions with known functional specializations. RESULTS: We identified 369 nominally genome-wide significant loci ( P < 5 × 10 −8 ) associated with cortical structure in a discovery sample of 33,992 participants of European ancestry. Of the 360 loci for which replication data were available, 241 loci influencing surface area and 66 influencing thickness remained significant after replication, with 237 loci passing multiple testing correction ( P < 8.3 × 10 −10 ; 187 influencing surface area and 50 influencing thickness). Common genetic variants explained 34% (SE = 3%) of the variation in total surface area and 26% (SE = 2%) in average thickness; surface area and thickness showed a negative genetic correlation ( r G = −0.32, SE = 0.05, P = 6.5 × 10 −12 ), which suggests that genetic influences have opposing effects on surface area and thickness. Bioinformatic analyses showed that total surface area is influenced by genetic variants that alter gene regulatory activity in neural progenitor cells during fetal development. By contrast, average thickness is influenced by active regulatory elements in adult brain samples, which may reflect processes that occur after mid-fetal development, such as myelination, branching, or pruning. When considered together, these results support the radial unit hypothesis that different developmental mechanisms promote surface area expansion and increases in thickness. To identify specific genetic influences on individual cortical regions, we controlled for global measures (total surface area or average thickness) in the regional analyses. After multiple testing correction, we identified 175 loci that influence regional surface area and 46 that influence regional thickness. Loci that affect regional surface area cluster near genes involved in the Wnt signaling pathway, which is known to influence areal identity. We observed significant positive genetic correlations and evidence of bidirectional causation of total surface area with both general cognitive functioning and educational attainment. We found additional positive genetic correlations between total surface area and Parkinson’s disease but did not find evidence of causation. Negative genetic correlations were evident between total surface area and insomnia, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, depressive symptoms, major depressive disorder, and neuroticism. CONCLUSION: This large-scale collaborative work enhances our understanding of the genetic architecture of the human cerebral cortex and its regional patterning. The highly polygenic architecture of the cortex suggests that distinct genes are involved in the development of specific cortical areas. Moreover, we find evidence that brain structure is a key phenotype along the causal pathway that leads from genetic variation to differences in general cognitive function. Identifying genetic influences on human cortical structure.: ( A ) Measurement of cortical surface area and thickness from MRI. ( B ) Genomic locations of common genetic variants that influence global and regional cortical structure. ( C ) Our results support the radial unit hypothesis that the expansion of cortical surface area is driven by proliferating neural progenitor cells. ( D ) Cortical surface area shows genetic correlation with psychiatric and cognitive traits. Error bars indicate SE. IMAGE CREDITS: (A) K. COURTNEY; (C) M. R. GLASS