Shengjie Liu

Shengjie Liu


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

3Years (2024-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
28 June 2025 in International Journal of Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
YCYongming Chen
Yongming Chen
TLTianxin Long
Tianxin Long
MLMing Liu
Ming Liu
SLShengjie Liu
Shengjie Liu
ZLZhengtong Lv
Zhengtong Lv
MLMing Liu
Ming Liu
Background: Early detection of prostate cancer (PCa) remains a clinical challenge. Plasma proteomics provides a non-invasive tool for identifying individuals at elevated risk prior to symptom onset or PSA elevation. Methods: We quantified 1463 plasma proteins in 23 825 PCa-free men from the UK Biobank (UKB). Participants were split into training and validation sets. Cox regression and Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) with forward feature selection were used to identify and rank predictive proteins. Model performance was assessed by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) in the validation set, and SHAP values were used to interpret feature contributions. Results: TSPAN1 and GP2 consistently ranked as top predictors across all analyses. In the training set, both proteins remained significantly associated with PCa risk after Bonferroni correction in multivariable Cox models. LightGBM with forward selection further prioritized TSPAN1 and GP2 as key contributors, and SHAP analysis confirmed their dominant importance. In the validation set, a model combining TSPAN1, GP2, and demographic variables achieved an AUC of 0.728 for overall PCa prediction and 0.760 for 5-year risk. Based on Youden Index–derived thresholds, high-expression groups of TSPAN1 and GP2 were associated with hazard ratios of 1.75 and 1.60, respectively. Longitudinal profiling showed that TSPAN1 levels began rising approximately 9 years before diagnosis, while GP2 increased from 6 years prior. Conclusions: TSPAN1 and GP2 are promising long-term predictive biomarkers for PCa. A streamlined proteomics-based model may enable individualized risk stratification and inform earlier, less invasive screening strategies.

16 September 2024 in BMJ Open
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
HLHan Li
Han Li
ZZZhang Zhipeng
Zhang Zhipeng
SLShengjie Liu
Shengjie Liu
MLMing Liu
Ming Liu
MLMing Liu
Ming Liu
XWXuan Wang
Xuan Wang
Objective: Few studies have examined the relationship between systemic oxidative stress and prostate cancer (PCa) risk. This study aimed to explore potential correlations between PCa and oxidative balance score (OBS), which measures systemic oxidative stress. Design: A cross-sectional study. Setting: The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Participants: A total of 8156 individuals were included in this study. Primary and secondary outcome measures: Weighted logistic regression with multivariable adjustment and restricted cubic splines (RCS) were used to assess the correlation between PCa and OBS. A sensitivity analysis was conducted specifically on patients with PCa to verify the results. Results: The prevalence of PCa was 2.55%. The multivariable logistic regression model revealed no correlation between OBS, dietary OBS, lifestyle OBS and PCa. Compared with the lowest quartile of OBS, the adjusted ORs for the highest quartile of OBS, dietary OBS and lifestyle OBS were 1.852 (95% CI 1.028–3.339), 1.565 (95% CI 0.841–2.913) and 1.575 (95% CI 0.915–2.710), respectively. Additionally, all p values for trend were greater than 0.05. Subgroup analysis revealed a consistent lack of association between OBS and PCa across various population settings. Furthermore, analysis using RCS confirmed this absence of association, indicating no significant relationship in either a linear or non-linear context. A sensitivity analysis focusing exclusively on patients with PCa showed a strong association (OR=2.737, p=0.008). Conclusion: This cross-sectional study reveals no significant association between systemic oxidative stress, measured by OBS, and PCa risk. Notably, a sensitivity analysis focusing solely on PCa patients suggested a potential link, warranting further investigation.