Louise V. Straatman

Dr. Louise V. Straatman


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NSNatalia Smith-Cortinez
Natalia Smith-Cortinez
KTKatherine Tan
Katherine Tan
RSRobert J. Stokroos
Robert J. Stokroos
HVHuib Versnel
Huib Versnel
LSLouise V. Straatman
Louise V. Straatman
Sensorineural hearing loss is caused by damage to sensory hair cells and/or spiral ganglion neurons. In non-mammalian species, hair cell regeneration after damage is observed, even in adulthood. Although the neonatal mammalian cochlea carries regenerative potential, the adult cochlea cannot regenerate lost hair cells. The survival of supporting cells with regenerative potential after cochlear trauma in adults is promising for promoting hair cell regeneration through therapeutic approaches. Targeting these cells by manipulating key signaling pathways that control mammalian cochlear development and non-mammalian hair cell regeneration could lead to regeneration of hair cells in the mammalian cochlea. This review discusses the pathways involved in the development of the cochlea and the impact that trauma has on the regenerative capacity of the endogenous progenitor cells. Furthermore, it discusses the effects of manipulating key signaling pathways targeting supporting cells with progenitor potential to promote hair cell regeneration and translates these findings to the human situation. To improve hearing recovery after hearing loss in adults, we propose a combined approach targeting (1) the endogenous progenitor cells by manipulating signaling pathways (Wnt, Notch, Shh, FGF and BMP/TGFβ signaling pathways), (2) by manipulating epigenetic control, and (3) by applying neurotrophic treatments to promote reinnervation.

5 October 2021 in Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
NSNatalia Smith-Cortinez
Natalia Smith-Cortinez
RYRana Yadak
Rana Yadak
FHFerry G. J. Hendriksen
Ferry G. J. Hendriksen
ESEefje Sanders
Eefje Sanders
DRDyan Ramekers
Dyan Ramekers
LSLouise V. Straatman
Louise V. Straatman
Sensorineural hearing loss is mainly caused by irreversible damage to sensory hair cells (HCs). A subgroup of supporting cells (SCs) in the cochlea express leucine-rich repeat-containing G-protein coupled receptor 5 (LGR5), a marker for tissue-resident stem cells. LGR5+ SCs could be used as an endogenous source of stem cells for regeneration of HCs to treat hearing loss. Here, we report long-term presence of LGR5+ SCs in the mature adult cochlea and survival of LGR5+ SCs after severe ototoxic trauma characterized by partial loss of inner HCs and complete loss of outer HCs. Surviving LGR5+ SCs (confirmed by GFP expression) were located in the third row of Deiters’ cells. We observed a change in the intracellular localization of GFP, from the nucleus in normal-hearing to cytoplasm and membrane in deafened mice. These data suggests that the adult mammalian cochlea possesses properties essential for regeneration even after severe ototoxic trauma.

24 August 2023 in Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
NSNatalia Smith-Cortinez
Natalia Smith-Cortinez
FHFerry G. J. Hendriksen
Ferry G. J. Hendriksen
DRDyan Ramekers
Dyan Ramekers
RSRobert J. Stokroos
Robert J. Stokroos
HVHuib Versnel
Huib Versnel
LSLouise V. Straatman
Louise V. Straatman
Introduction: The leucine-rich repeat-containing G-protein coupled receptor 5 (LGR5) is a tissue resident stem cell marker, which it is expressed in supporting cells (SCs) in the organ of Corti in the mammalian inner ear. These LGR5+ SCs can be used as an endogenous source of progenitor cells for regeneration of hair cells (HCs) to treat hearing loss and deafness. We have recently reported that LGR5+ SCs survive 1 week after ototoxic trauma. Here, we evaluated Lgr5 expression in the adult cochlea and long-term survival of LGR5+ SCs following severe hearing loss.Methods: Lgr5GFP transgenic mice and wild type mice aged postnatal day 30 (P30) and P200 were used. P30 animals were deafened with a single dose of furosemide and kanamycin. Seven and 28 days after deafening, auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) were recorded. Cochleas were harvested to characterize mature HCs and LGR5+ SCs by immunofluorescence microscopy and quantitative reverse transcription PCR (q-RT-PCR).Results: There were no significant age-related changes in Lgr5 expression when comparing normal-hearing (NH) mice aged P200 with P30. Seven and 28 days after ototoxic trauma, there was severe outer HC loss and LGR5 was expressed in the third row of Deiters’ cells and in inner pillar cells. Seven days after induction of ototoxic trauma there was an up-regulation of the mRNA expression of Lgr5 compared to the NH condition; 28 days after ototoxic trauma Lgr5 expression was similar to NH levels.Discussion: The presence of LGR5+ SCs in the adult mouse cochlea, which persists after severe HC loss, suggests potential regenerative capacity of endogenous cochlear progenitor cells in adulthood. To our knowledge, this is the first study showing not only long-term survival of LGR5+ SCs in the normal and ototoxically damaged cochlea, but also increased Lgr5 expression in the adult mouse cochlea after deafening, suggesting long-term availability of potential target cells for future regenerative therapies.

22 September 2026 in Otology & Neurotology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CEChiara Erfurt
Chiara Erfurt
MRMaud J. de Rooij
Maud J. de Rooij
LSLouise V. Straatman
Louise V. Straatman
HTHans G.X.M. Thomeer
Hans G.X.M. Thomeer
Purpose: This systematic review aimed to summarize the available evidence on clinical, patient-related, and economic outcomes of the canal wall up (CWU) tympanomastoidectomy, with and without the obliteration technique in surgical cholesteatoma care. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the EU Clinical Trials Register. The NHS EED database was also searched for economic evaluations. All searches were completed by July 7, 2025. Studies were included if they evaluated the obliteration technique alongside CWU or compared it to CWU without obliteration in adults. The primary outcome was recurrent/residual disease. Secondary outcomes included hearing results, complications, quality of life, and economic evaluations. Two authors independently screened and included the literature; quality assessment was assessed by all authors and determined by consensus. Results: Four comparative and 5 noncomparative retrospective studies addressed the primary outcome. Surgical complications were reported in all but one of the articles. Three additional studies focused on secondary outcomes: 2 on quality of life and 1 on hearing. No studies were identified on economic evaluations or cost analyses. Furthermore, no prospective studies or randomized controlled trials were found. Conclusion: The results of nearly all included studies indicate a reduction in recidivism rates when the obliteration technique is added to the canal wall up (CWU) approach. However, no high-level evidence studies are currently available, and the existing studies are likely subject to confounding factors. In addition, significant heterogeneity among the studies limits the ability to draw definitive conclusions at this stage.

10 June 2021
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RMR Mahieu
R Mahieu
HTH G X M Thomeer
H G X M Thomeer
LSLouise V. Straatman
Louise V. Straatman