The SARS-CoV-19 pandemic overwhelmed multiple healthcare systems across the world. Patients with underlying medical conditions such as obesity or diabetes were particularly vulnerable, had more severe symptoms, and were more frequently hospitalized. To date, there have been many studies on the severity of SARS-CoV-2 in patients with metabolic disorders, but data on the efficiency of vaccines against COVID-19 are still limited. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines in individuals with diabetes, insulin resistance, and obesity. A comparison is made between the immune response after vaccination in patients with and without metabolic comorbidities. Additionally, an attempt is made to highlight the mechanisms of immune stimulation affected by SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and how metabolic comorbidities modulate these mechanisms. The focus is on the most common COVID-19 vaccines, which include mRNA vaccines such as Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna, as well as viral vector vaccines such as AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson. Furthermore, an effort is made to clarify how the functional differences between these vaccines may impact the response in individuals with metabolic disorders, drawing from available experimental data. This review summarizes the current knowledge regarding the post-vaccination response to COVID-19 in the context of metabolic comorbidities such as diabetes, insulin resistance, and obesity.

Background: This retrospective study from a single center in Poland was undertaken to evaluate the clinical utility of neu-trophil-to-platelet ratio in therapy of 35 ulcerative colitis (UC) patients with infliximab or vedolizumab.Material/Methods: This study included 35 patients: 16 were treated with infliximab and 19 were treated with vedolizumab. Treatment response was evaluated using partial Mayo score. Treatment response was defined as a reduction of partial Mayo score of >= 3 points followed by a decrease of a minimum of 30% from the baseline, decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of >= 1, or an absolute rectal bleeding subscore of 0 or 1. During the maintenance period, we diagnosed 13 patients with loss of response (LOR) (5 with infliximab and 8 with vedolizumab). The Mann-Whitney U test was performed to assess differences between the groups. Statistical significance was defined as P= 32.511. There were no other significant findings.Conclusions: Neutrophil-to-platelet ratio might be a promising biomarker of LOR in biologic therapy of UC. However, to ful-ly prove this, further studies are needed.

Obesity and diabetes are associated with severe outcomes of coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) have been proven protective against infection and severe COVID-19. However, the immune response of metabolically burdened individuals to the vaccines remains unclear. Thus, we aimed to assess whether the metabolic status of individuals affects their humoral immune responses to the vaccination. Moreover, we evaluated whether the interval between the first two doses influenced antibody concentration. Sixty-seven individuals (21 males, 46 females) were vaccinated with the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. Fifty-four individuals were vaccinated with the second dose after 3 weeks and 13 after 5 weeks. We measured the antibody titers in all participants during the 19-week follow-up period. Patients diagnosed with COVID-19 were excluded. In the 5-week interval group, a significantly higher level of maximal antibody titers was observed. However, there were no differences in antibody concentrations after 19 weeks and no significant correlation between cardiometabolic factors and humoral response. The elongation of second-dose timing to 5 weeks leads to a higher acute antibody response but does not change long-term levels of antibody titers. Moreover, dysregulation of metabolic parameters does not lead to a diminished immune response to vaccination.

The sudden outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic posed a great threat to the world’s healthcare systems. It resulted in the development of new methods and algorithms for the diagnosis and treatment of both COVID-19 and its complications. Diagnostic imaging played a crucial role in both cases. Among the most widely used examinations are transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and computed tomography angiography (CTA). Cardiovascular complications in COVID-19 are frequently associated with a severe inflammatory response, which results in acute respiratory failure, further leading to severe complications of the cardiovascular system. Our review aims to discuss the value of TTE and CTA in clinical decision making and outcome prediction in patients with COVID-19-associated cardiovascular complications. Our review revealed the high clinical value of various TTE findings and their association with mortality and the prediction of patients’ clinical outcomes, especially when used with other laboratory parameters. The strongest association between increased mortality and findings in TTE was observed for tachycardia and decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (odds ratio (OR) 24.06) and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion/pulmonary artery systolic pressure ratio (TAPSE/PASP ratio) < 0.31 mm/mmHg (OR 17.80). CTA is a valuable tool in diagnosing COVID-19-associated pulmonary embolism, but its association with mortality and its predictive role should always be combined with laboratory findings and patients’ medical history. D-dimers > 3000 ng/mL were found as the strongest predictors of pulmonary embolism (PE) (OR 7.494). Our review indicates the necessity for an active search for cardiovascular complications in patients with severe COVID-19, as they are linked with an increased probability of fatal outcomes.

Flammer syndrome, which has been described in literature only recently, combines two basic components: primary vascular dysregulation and symptoms not directly related to vascular function (prolonged sleep onset time, low pain threshold or specific personality traits). Some health-protective effects, such as a reduced risk atherosclerosis and metabolic syndrome, have also been noted. Flammer syndrome most often coexists with ocular diseases, normal tension glaucoma in particular, as well as with neurological disorders, such as multiple sclerosis. Diagnosis is based on a detailed physical examination; however, standardised diagnostic methods are missing. A three-component therapeutic strategy, including appropriate lifestyle, proper nutrition and pharmacotherapy in the form of magnesium preparations or low-dose calcium channel blockers, is used for Flammer syndrome. Clinical studies in 2016 and 2019 showed that multiple sclerosis patients are significantly more likely to develop typical symptoms of Flammer syndrome compared to controls. These included dizziness, low body weight, non-migraine headaches, reduced feeling of thirst, prolonged sleep onset time, and a tendency towards perfectionism. Although the aetiology of Flammer syndrome and multiple sclerosis or the causes underlying the clinical correlations between them have not been clarified so far, expanded research may contribute to better care for those at increased risk of developing multiple sclerosis, as well as improved therapy and support for patients, with consideration given to challenges that may arise from the coexistence of both diseases.