Osteoporosis is a common systemic disease of the skeleton, characterized by compromised bone mass and strength, consequently leading to an increased risk of fragility fractures. In women, the disease mainly occurs due to the menopausal fall in estrogen levels, leading to an imbalance between bone resorption and bone formation and, consequently, to bone loss and bone fragility. Moreover, osteoporosis may affect men and may occur as a sequela to different diseases or even to their treatments. Despite their wide prevalence in the general population, the skeletal implications of many gastrointestinal diseases have been poorly investigated and their potential contribution to bone fragility is often underestimated in clinical practice. However, proper functioning of the gastrointestinal system appears essential for the skeleton, allowing correct absorption of calcium, vitamins, or other nutrients relevant to bone, preserving the gastrointestinal barrier function, and maintaining an optimal endocrine-metabolic balance, so that it is very likely that most chronic diseases of the gastrointestinal tract, and even gastrointestinal dysbiosis, may have profound implications for bone health. In this manuscript, we provide an updated and critical revision of the role of major gastrointestinal disorders in the pathogenesis of osteoporosis and fragility fractures.

The World Health Organization’s (WHO) 2022 update on the classification of odontogenic and maxillofacial bone tumors has revolutionized diagnostic and treatment paradigms by integrating novel molecular insights. Fibro-osseous lesions of the maxillo-facial bones constitute a heterogeneous group encompassing fibrous dysplasia, Psammomatoid Ossifying Fibroma (PSOF), Juvenile Trabecular Ossifying Fibroma (JTOF), and other variants. Despite histological similarities, their distinct clinical manifestations and prognostic implications mandate precise differentiation. The intricacies of diagnosing fibro-osseous lesions pose challenges for pathologists, maxillofacial surgeons, dentists and oral surgeons, underscoring the importance of a systematic approach to ensure optimal patient management. Herein, we present two cases, fibrous dysplasia and Cemento-Ossifying Fibroma, detailing their clinical encounters and management strategies. Both patients provided informed consent for publishing their data and images, adhering to ethical guidelines.

Background: Peak tricuspid regurgitation (TR) velocity and inferior cava vein (ICV) distention are two recognized features of increased pulmonary artery pressure (PASP) and right atrial pressure, respectively. Both parameters are related to pulmonary and systemic congestion and adverse outcomes. However, few data exist about the assessment of PASP and ICV in acute patients affected by heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Thus, we investigated the relationship existing among clinical and echocardiographic features of congestion, and we analyzed the prognostic impact of PASP and ICV in acute HFpEF patients. Methods and Results: We analyzed clinical congestion PASP and ICV value in consecutive patients admitted in our ward by echocardiographic examination using peak Doppler velocity tricuspid regurgitation and ICV diameter and collapse for the assessment of PASP and ICV dimension, respectively. A total of 173 HFpEF patients were included in the analysis. The median age was 81 and median left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 55% [50–57]. Mean values of PASP was 45 mmHg [35–55] and mean ICV was 22 [20–24] mm. Patients with adverse events during follow-up showed significantly higher values of PASP (50 [35–55] vs. 40 [35–48] mmHg, (p = 0.005) and increased values of ICV (24 [22–25] vs. 22 [20–23] mm, p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed prognostic power of ICV dilatation (HR 3.22 [1.58–6.55], p = 0.001) and clinical congestion score ≥ 2 (HR 2.35 [1.12–4.93], p = 0.023), but PASP increase did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.874). The combination of PASP > 40 mmHg and ICV > 21 mm was capable of identifying patients with increased events (45% vs. 20%). Conclusions: ICV dilatation provides additional prognostic information with respect to PASP in patients with acute HFpEF. A combined model adding PASP and ICV assessment to clinical evaluation is a useful tool for predicting HF related events.