The rapid, global spread of COVID-19, and the measures intended to limit or slow its propagation, are having major impacts on diverse sectors of society. Notably, these impacts are occurring in the context of other anthropogenic-driven threats including global climate change. Both anthropogenic stressors and the COVID-19 pandemic represent significant economic challenges to aquaculture systems across the globe, threatening the supply chain of one of the most important sources of animal protein, with potential disproportionate impacts on vulnerable communities. A web survey was conducted in 47 countries in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic to assess how aquaculture activities have been affected by the pandemic, and to explore how these impacts compare to those from climate change. A positive correlation between the effects of the two categories of drivers was detected, but analysis suggests that the pandemic and the anthropogenic stressors affect different parts of the supply chain. The immediate measurable reported losses varied with aquaculture typology (land vs. marine, and intensive vs. extensive). A comparably lower impact on farmers reporting the use of integrated multitrophic aquaculture (IMTA) methods suggests that IMTA might enhance resilience to multiple stressors by providing different market options under the COVID-19 pandemic. Results emphasize the importance of assessing detrimental effects of COVID-19 under a multiple stressor lens, focusing on areas that have already locally experienced economic loss due to anthropogenic stressors in the last decade. Holistic policies that simultaneously address other ongoing anthropogenic stressors, rather than focusing solely on the acute impacts of COVID-19, are needed to maximize the long-term resilience of the aquaculture sector.

Microplastics represent an ever-increasing threat to aquatic organisms. We merged data from two global scale meta-analyses investigating the effect of microplastics on benthic organisms’ and fishes’ functional traits. Results were compared, allowing differences related to vertebrate and invertebrate habitat, life stage, trophic level, and experimental design to be explored. Functional traits of aquatic organisms were negatively affected. Metabolism, growth, and reproduction of benthic organisms were impacted, and fish behaviour was significantly affected. Responses differed by trophic level, suggesting negative effects on trophic interactions and energy transfer through the trophic web. The experimental design was found to have the most significant impact on results. As microplastics impact an organism’s performance, this causes indirect repercussions further up the ecological hierarchy on the ecosystem’s stability and functioning, and its associated goods and services are at risk. Standardized methods to generate salient targets and indicators are urgently needed to better inform policy makers and guide mitigation plans.

Habitat fragmentation (HF) is an ecological process, which is potentially also one of the main causes of diversity loss. Many studies have debated the best tools to adopt for assessing the effects of HF. The traditional application of biodiversity metrics might not fully describe the biotic community associated to a particular habitat or the ongoing ecological processes. The community-weighted mean (CWM) seems to be a valid investigation index, since biological traits (BTs) of the associated community are selected by local environmental factors. Furthermore, by combining species with common BTs into Functional Groups (FGs), it is possible to account for ecological functions that are supported by the inclusion of the response of key species within the same context. In our case study, we investigated the possible effect of HF of different Sicilian vermetid reefs on the associated infralittoral fish community based on the (i) vermetid fragmentation level, (ii) nature of the infralittoral substratum and (iii) conservational level of protection. We expected HF to be the main factor in shaping the local fish community; however, the nature of the infralittoral substratum proved to be the principal driver of the ichthyofaunal community. By analysing separately the two infralittoral substrata considered in the study, we observed how HF might affect the associated fish community differently. A pristine vermetid reef seems to sustain a higher number of FGs when established on a rocky substratum. On the other hand, in the presence of a sandy substratum, a fragmented vermetid reef seems to attract a more functionally rich fish community than those accounted for a pristine status. Our results provide some evidence in support of the need to include a broad spectrum of community function descriptors for a more comprehensive characterisation of a habitat and for the assessment of the functioning of its ecosystem.