Emmanuel Gonzalez-Bautista

Dr. Emmanuel Gonzalez-Bautista

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications

26 February 2022 in Maturitas
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ASAaron Salinas
Aaron Salinas
EGEmmanuel Gonzalez-Bautista
Emmanuel Gonzalez-Bautista
ARAna Rivera-Almaraz
Ana Rivera-Almaraz
BMBetty Manrique-Espinoza
Betty Manrique-Espinoza

1 April 2021 in The Journal of Frailty & Aging
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EGEmmanuel Gonzalez-Bautista
Emmanuel Gonzalez-Bautista
PBP. De Souto Barreto
P. De Souto Barreto
KGK. Virecoulon Giudici
K. Virecoulon Giudici
SAS. Andrieu
S. Andrieu
YRY. Rolland
Y. Rolland
BVB. Vellas
B. Vellas
The screening tool of the Integrated Care for Older People (ICOPE Step 1), designed to detect declines in the domains of intrinsic capacity, has been incip

9 August 2024 in Nature Aging
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PBPhilipe De Souto Barreto
Philipe De Souto Barreto
EGEmmanuel Gonzalez-Bautista
Emmanuel Gonzalez-Bautista
HBHeike A. Bischoff-Ferrari
Heike A. Bischoff-Ferrari
VOVitor Pelegrim de Oliveira
Vitor Pelegrim de Oliveira
RMRenato G B Bandeira de Mello
Renato G B Bandeira de Mello
BVBruno Vellas
Bruno Vellas

28 July 2023 in Maturitas
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VOVitor Pelegrim de Oliveira
Vitor Pelegrim de Oliveira
EFEduardo Ferriolli
Eduardo Ferriolli
RLRoberto Alves Lourenço
Roberto Alves Lourenço
EGEmmanuel Gonzalez-Bautista
Emmanuel Gonzalez-Bautista
PBPhilipe De Souto Barreto
Philipe De Souto Barreto
RMRenato G B Bandeira de Mello
Renato G B Bandeira de Mello

26 August 2022 in Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
EGEmmanuel Gonzalez-Bautista
Emmanuel Gonzalez-Bautista
PBPhilipe de Souto Barreto
Philipe de Souto Barreto
ASAaron Salinas‐Rodriguez
Aaron Salinas‐Rodriguez
BMBetty Manrique‐Espinoza
Betty Manrique‐Espinoza
YRYves Rolland
Yves Rolland
FGfor the MAPT/DSA group
for the MAPT/DSA group
Background: Clinically meaningful changes in the five‐repetition chair stand test are essential for monitoring mobility in integrated care for older people. Recommendations for the clinically meaningful change of the chair stand test are not well known. Our study aimed to estimate the absolute and relative clinically meaningful changes for older adults' five‐repetition chair stand test.Methods: We applied distribution‐based and anchor‐based methods in addition to receiver operator characteristics analyses to a population‐based study of community‐dwelling adults (SAGE Mexico study, n = 897) to derive the clinically meaningful change in the chair stand test. We used three self‐reported clinical anchors: moving around, vigorous activities, and walking 1 km. Our primary outcome was the incidence of disability for basic activities of daily living (ADL). Secondly, we examined our estimates of clinically meaningful change in a clinical trial population of healthy volunteers (MAPT, France, study n = 1575) concerning the risk of incident ADL disability.Results: The age of SAGE Mexico participants ranged from 60 to 96 years; mean (SD) = 69.0 (6.2); 54.4% were female. Their baseline chair stand time averaged 12.1 s (SD = 3 s). Forty‐eight participants (5.6%) showed incident disability over 3 years. The absolute and relative clinically meaningful change cut points found over 3 years of follow‐up were 2.6 s and 27.7%, respectively. Absolute clinically meaningful change ranged from 0.5 to 4.7 s, depending on the estimation method. Relative clinically meaningful change ranged from 9.6 to 46.2%. SAGE Mexico participants with absolute and relative clinically meaningful declines (increasing 2.6 s and 27.7% from baseline time, respectively) showed an increased risk of ADL disability [aRR = 1.93; P = 0.0381; 95% CI (1.05, 3.46) and aRR = 2.27; P = 0.0157; 95% CI (1.22, 4.10)], respectively, compared with those without a clinically meaningful decline. MAPT participants [age range = 70–94; mean (SD) = 75.3 (4.4); 64.8% female; incident ADL disability over 5 years = 145(14.8%)] with a relative clinically meaningful decline (≥27.7% from baseline over 3 years) had a 74% higher risk of incident ADL disability than their counterparts [aHR = 1.74; P = 0.016; CI95% (1.11, 2.72); mean follow‐up of 58 months].Conclusions: Community‐dwelling older adults with an increase of 3 s or 28% in chair stand test performance over 3 years (approximately 1 s or 10% per year) could be the target of interventions to enhance mobility and prevent incident disability.