Clinical trials identified intravitreal vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors (anti-VEGF agents) have the potential to stabilise or even improve visual acuity outcomes in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD), a sight-threatening disease. Real-world evidence allows us to assess whether results from randomised controlled trials can be applied to the general population. We describe the development of global registries, in particular the Fight Retinal Blindness! registry that originated in Australia, the United Kingdom AMD Electronic Medical Records User Group and the IRIS registry in the USA. Real-world observations relating to efficacy, safety and resource utilisation of intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy for neovascular AMD are then summarised. Novel observations that would have been challenging to identify in a clinical trial setting are then highlighted, including the risk of late disease reactivation, outcomes in second versus first treated eyes, and the increased risk of posterior capsular rupture during cataract surgery in patients who have received intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy. We conclude by exploring future directions in the field. This includes the development of a global consensus on real-world outcome measures to allow greater comparison of results. Real-world neovascular AMD outcome registries can be linked with other databases to determine systemic safety or genetic predictors of treatment efficacy. Machine learning offers opportunities to extract useful insights from "Big Data" often collected in these registries. Real-world registries could be used by drug regulatory authorities and industry as an alternative to more costly and time-consuming phase 4 clinical trials, potentially allowing medication costs to be based on outcomes achieved.

Diabetic macular edema (DME), a serious eye complication caused primarily by hyperglycemia, is one of the major causes of blindness. DME, which is characterized by cystic retinal thickening or lipid deposition, is prone to relapse after successful treatment. DME is a complex pathological process caused by multiple factors, including breakdown of the inner and outer blood-retinal barriers, oxidative stress, and elevated levels of vascular endothelial growth factor which have been demonstrated in both preclinical and clinical studies. Starling’s law theory explains many of the features of DME. Early detection and treatment of DME can prevent vision loss. Current effective interventions for DME include treatment of systemic risk factors, such as elevated blood glucose, blood pressure and dyslipidemia. Ophthalmic treatments include laser photocoagulation, surgery and intraocular pharmacotherapy. New drugs, which are given by intraocular injection, have emerged in recent years to become first line treatment for DME that affects the central macula with loss of vision. Laser photocoagulation is still the gold standard of treatment for DME which does not involve the central macular. This review outlines these new treatments with particular emphasis on the optimal timing of how they are given.

Importance To our knowledge, this is the first randomized clinical trial to compare visual outcomes and injection loads between ranibizumab and aflibercept using an identical treat-and-extend (TE) regimen for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Objective To report the results of the preplanned 12-month interim analysis of 2 predefined secondary efficacy end points of a randomized clinical trial. Design, Setting, and Participants The Comparison of Ranibizumab and Aflibercept for the Development of Geographic Atrophy in (Wet) AMD Patients (RIVAL) trial was conducted in 24 sites in Australia and included 281 treatment-naive eyes from 281 participants with active choroidal neovascularization secondary to nAMD and a visual acuity letter score of 23 or greater who were recruited between April 11, 2014, and October 31, 2015. A preplanned interim analysis was performed at month 12. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) assessors and the central reading center, which determined treatment intervals, were masked to treatment assignments. Interventions Participants were randomized (1:1) to receive intravitreal injections of 0.5 mg of ranibizumab or 2.0 mg of aflibercept. After receiving 3 initial monthly injections, participants entered the TE phase. Main Outcomes and Measures Mean change in BCVA and the number of injections from baseline to month 12. Results Of 281 participants, 148 (52.7%) were women and the mean (SD) age was 77.7 (8.1) years. The baseline mean BCVA letter score (approximate Snellen equivalent) was 65.3 (20/50) in the ranibizumab arm and 65.1 (20/50) in the aflibercept arm. One hundred twenty-seven ranibizumab participants (90.1%) and 121 aflibercept participants (88.3%) completed month 12 with a mean (SD [Snellen equivalent]) BCVA letter score of 72.9 (15.5 [20/32]) and 70.5 (14.6 [20/40]), respectively. The mean change in BCVA letter scores from baseline to month 12 was 7.2 (95% CI, 5.5-8.9) for ranibizumab and 4.9 (95% CI, 3.1-6.6) for aflibercept (letter score difference, 2.3; 95% CI, −0.1 to 4.7;P = .06). The mean number of injections from baseline to month 12 was 9.7 in both the ranibizumab (SD, 2.8) and aflibercept (SD, 2.6) arms with a rate ratio of 1.00 (95% CI, 1.0-1.1;P = .86). Conclusions and Relevance Our findings suggest that neither aflibercept nor ranibizumab for nAMD are superior to the other regarding the average visual acuity gains and number of injections during 1 year in a TE regimen. Further follow-up to 2 years may determine if advantages of one over the other can be identified. Trial Registration Clinicaltrials.Gov identifier:NCT02130024

To define a minimum set of outcome measures for tracking, comparing, and improving macular degeneration care. Recommendations from a working group of international experts in macular degeneration outcomes registry development and patient advocates, facilitated by the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM). Modified Delphi technique, supported by structured teleconferences, followed by online surveys to drive consensus decisions. Potential outcomes were identified through literature review of outcomes collected in existing registries and reported in major clinical trials. Outcomes were refined by the working group and selected based on impact on patients, relationship to good clinical care, and feasibility of measurement in routine clinical practice. Standardized measurement of the following outcomes is recommended: visual functioning and quality of life (distance visual acuity, mobility and independence, emotional well-being, reading and accessing information); number of treatments; complications of treatment; and disease control. Proposed data collection sources include administrative data, clinical data during routine clinical visits, and patient-reported sources annually. Recording the following clinical characteristics is recommended to enable risk adjustment: age; sex; ethnicity; smoking status; baseline visual acuity in both eyes; type of macular degeneration; presence of geographic atrophy, subretinal fibrosis, or pigment epithelial detachment; previous macular degeneration treatment; ocular comorbidities. The recommended minimum outcomes and pragmatic reporting standards should enable standardized, meaningful assessments and comparisons of macular degeneration treatment outcomes. Adoption could accelerate global improvements in standardized data gathering and reporting of patient-centered outcomes. This can facilitate informed decisions by patients and health care providers, plus allow long-term monitoring of aggregate data, ultimately improving understanding of disease progression and treatment responses.

To investigate differences in the development of macular atrophy (MA) over 24 months between treat-and-extend (T&E) ranibizumab and aflibercept in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). A phase 4 randomized, partially masked, multicenter study. Individuals 50 years of age or older diagnosed with active, treatment-naïve subfoveal choroidal neovascularization secondary to nAMD with baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 23 logarithm of minimum angle of resolution letters or more. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either intravitreal injections of ranibizumab 0.5 mg or aflibercept 2.0 mg and were treated according to the same reading center-guided T&E regimen after 3 initial monthly injections. The primary outcome was mean change in square root area of MA from baseline to month 24. Key secondary outcomes included number of injections and mean change in BCVA from baseline to months 12 and 24. Two hundred seventy-eight patients were included in the analysis (ranibizumab 0.5 mg, n = 141; aflibercept 2.0 mg, n = 137). Mean change in square root area of MA from baseline to month 24 was +0.36 mm (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.27-0.45 mm) for ranibizumab and +0.28 mm (95% CI, 0.19-0.37 mm) for aflibercept (treatment difference, +0.08 mm [95% CI, -0.05 to 0.21 mm]; P = 0.24). The proportion of patients with MA increased from 7% (10/141) to 37% (43/117) for ranibizumab and from 6% (8/137) to 32% (35/108) for aflibercept from baseline to month 24. The average number of injections received per year was similar between both groups: 9.6 (95% CI, 9.2-10.0) for ranibizumab and 9.5 (95% CI, 9.1-9.9) for aflibercept. The mean change in BCVA from baseline to month 24 was +6.6 letters (95% CI,4.7-8.5 letters) for the ranibizumab group and +4.6 letters (95% CI, 2.7-6.6 letters) for the aflibercept group ( P = 0.15). Rates of adverse events (AEs) were similar between both groups. No significant differences in the rate of development or growth of MA over 24 months were observed between ranibizumab and aflibercept in nAMD patients treated using an identical T&E regimen.