Anna-Lena Volckmar

Dr. Anna-Lena Volckmar

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2018 in European Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Christian MenzerChristian Menzer
Christian Menzer
BBBernd Beedgen
Bernd Beedgen
JRJoachim Rom
Joachim Rom
CDChristin M. Duffert
Christin M. Duffert
AVAnna-Lena Volckmar
Anna-Lena Volckmar
Jessica HasselJessica Hassel
Jessica Hassel

5 September 2019 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MKMartina Kirchner
Martina Kirchner
ONOlaf Neumann
Olaf Neumann
AVAnna-Lena Volckmar
Anna-Lena Volckmar
FSFabian Stögbauer
Fabian Stögbauer
MAMichael Allgäuer
Michael Allgäuer
Albrecht  StenzingerAlbrecht Stenzinger
Albrecht Stenzinger
Oncogenic gene fusions are important drivers in many cancer types, including carcinomas, with diagnostic and therapeutic implications. Hence, sensitive and rapid methods for parallel profiling in formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) specimens are needed. In this study we analyzed gene fusions in a cohort of 517 cases where standard treatment options were exhausted. To this end the Archer® DX Solid tumor panel (AMP; 285 cases) and the Oncomine Comprehensive Assay v3 (OCA; 232 cases) were employed. Findings were validated by Sanger sequencing, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) or immunohistochemistry. Both assays demonstrated minimal dropout rates (AMP: 2.4%; n = 7/292, OCA: 2.1%; n = 5/237) with turnaround times of 6–9 working days (median, OCA and AMP, respectively). Hands-on-time for library preparation was 6 h (AMP) and 2 h (OCA). We detected n = 40 fusion-positive cases (7.7%) with TMPRSS2::ERG in prostate cancer being most prevalent (n = 9/40; 22.5%), followed by other gene fusions identified in cancers of unknown primary (n = 6/40; 15.0%), adenoid cystic carcinoma (n = 7/40; 17.5%), and pancreatic cancer (n = 7/40; 17.5%). Our results demonstrate that targeted RNA-sequencing of FFPE samples is feasible, and a well-suited approach for the detection of gene fusions in a routine clinical setting.

21 January 2019 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PCPetros Christopoulos
Petros Christopoulos
SDSteffen Dietz
Steffen Dietz
MKMartina Kirchner
Martina Kirchner
AVAnna-Lena Volckmar
Anna-Lena Volckmar
VEVolker Endris
Volker Endris
Albrecht  StenzingerAlbrecht Stenzinger
Albrecht Stenzinger
Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) sequencing can identify resistance mechanisms and guide next-line therapy in ALK+ non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but the clinical significance of other rebiopsy findings remains unclear. We analysed all stage-IV ALK+ NSCLC patients with longitudinally assessable TP53 status treated in our institutions (n = 62). Patients with TP53 mutations at baseline (TP53mutbas, n = 23) had worse overall survival (OS) than patients with initially wild-type tumours (TP53wtbas, n = 39, 44 vs. 62 months in median, p = 0.018). Within the generally favourable TP53wtbas group, detection of TP53 mutations at progression defined a “converted” subgroup (TP53mutconv, n = 9) with inferior OS, similar to that of TP53mutbas and shorter than that of patients remaining TP53 wild-type (TP53wtprogr, 45 vs. 94 months, p = 0.043). Progression-free survival (PFS) under treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) for TP53mutconv was comparable to that of TP53mutbas and also shorter than that of TP53wtprogr cases (5 and 8 vs. 13 months, p = 0.0039). Fewer TP53wtprogr than TP53mutbas or TP53mutconv cases presented with metastatic disease at diagnosis (67% vs. 91% or 100%, p < 0.05). Thus, acquisition of TP53 mutations at progression is associated with more aggressive disease, shorter TKI responses and inferior OS in ALK+ NSCLC, comparable to primary TP53 mutated cases.

17 January 2024 in European Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MBMiriam Blasi
Miriam Blasi
JKJonas Kuon
Jonas Kuon
HLHeike Lüders
Heike Lüders
DMDaniel Misch
Daniel Misch
DKDiego Kauffmann-Guerrero
Diego Kauffmann-Guerrero
PCPetros Christopoulos
Petros Christopoulos
The efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with MET exon 14 skipping (METΔ14ex) remains controversial. 110 consecutive METΔ14ex NSCLC patients receiving first-line chemotherapy (CHT) and/or immunotherapy (IO) in 10 German centers between 2016-2022 were analyzed. Combined CHT-IO was given to 35/110 (32%) patients, IO alone to 43/110 (39%), and CHT to 32/110 (29%) upfront. Compared to CHT, CHT-IO showed longer progression-free survival (median PFS 6 vs. 2.5 months, p = 0.004), more objective responses (ORR 49% vs. 28%, p = 0.086) and numerically longer overall survival (OS 16 vs. 10 months, p = 0.240). For IO monotherapy, OS (14 vs. 16 months) and duration of response (26 vs. 22 months) were comparable to those of CHT-IO. Primary progressive disease (PD) was more frequent with IO compared to CHT-IO (13/43 vs. 3/35, p = 0.018), particularly for never-smokers (p = 0.041). Higher PD-L1 TPS were not associated with better IO outcomes, but TP53 mutated tumors showed numerically improved ORR (56% vs. 32%, p = 0.088) and PFS (6 vs. 3 months, p = 0.160), as well as longer OS in multivariable analysis (HR=0.54, p = 0.034) compared to their wild-type counterparts. Any second-line treatment was administered to 35/75 (47%) patients, with longer survival for capmatinib or tepotinib compared to crizotinib (PFS 10 vs. 3 months, p = 0.013; OS 16 vs. 13 months, p = 0.270). CHT-IO is superior to CHT, and IO alone also effective for METΔ14ex NSCLC, especially in the presence of TP53 mutations and independent of PD-L1 expression, but never-smokers are at higher risk of primary PD.

1 December 2018 in Pathology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JLJonas Leichsenring
Jonas Leichsenring
FSFabian Stögbauer
Fabian Stögbauer
AVAnna-Lena Volckmar
Anna-Lena Volckmar
IBIvo Buchhalter
Ivo Buchhalter
COCristiano Oliveira
Cristiano Oliveira
Albrecht  StenzingerAlbrecht Stenzinger
Albrecht Stenzinger

17 October 2018 in Genes, Chromosomes and Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AVAnna-Lena Volckmar
Anna-Lena Volckmar
VEVolker Endris
Volker Endris
MGMatthias M. Gaida
Matthias M. Gaida
JLJonas Leichsenring
Jonas Leichsenring
FSFabian Stögbauer
Fabian Stögbauer
Albrecht  StenzingerAlbrecht Stenzinger
Albrecht Stenzinger