Fatigue, a common symptom, together with the characteristic of performance fatigability, are well-documented features of SMA that impact quality of life and function. Importantly, establishing associations between multidimensional self-reported fatigue scales and patient performance has proven difficult. This review was conducted to evaluate the various patient-reported fatigue scales applied in SMA, with the objective of considering the limitations and advantages of each measure. Variable use of fatigue-related nomenclature, including conflicting terminology interpretation, has affected assessment of physical fatigue attributes, specifically perceived fatigability. This review encourages the development of original patient-reported scales to enable perceived fatigability assessment, providing a potential complementary method of evaluating treatment response.

Background: Fatigue and fatigability are commonly reported in spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). Physical fatigability, proposed to be the most relevant to SMA pathophysiology, encompasses performance-based and perceived physical fatigability (PPF) assessments. While performance-based measures have highlighted physical fatigability as an SMA hallmark, PPF is not well characterized due to the lack of disease- and construct-specific scales. Objective: Our aim was to create a patient-reported outcome measure tailored for SMA, named the SMA EFFORT, to improve PPF assessment. Here, we describe the scale development process, assess scale properties, and discuss future research and application. Methods: SMA and scale development experts organized a comprehensive physical activity item bank, relevant across the SMA phenotypic spectrum. Activities were systematically categorized by varying intensities and durations. The SMA EFFORT was completed by an international cohort of individuals with all types of SMA. To compare PPF across demographic and clinical variables, SMA EFFORT PPF percent (PPF%) composite scoring was established. Results: One hundred eighteen participants completed the SMA EFFORT. Total PPF% scores were broadly distributed within functional groups, with differences between non-sitters (35.1 ± 21.0) and sitters (24.9 ± 15.1) ( p  = 0.006), and those with (34.4 ± 18.1) and without respiratory support (26.4 ± 17.8) ( p  = 0.02). Participants treated with disease modifying therapy (DMT) showed similar scores to those without treatment ( p  = 0.70). Further, no differences in scores were observed in participants with scoliosis surgery and those without ( p  = 0.71). Subscale analyses revealed differences in mean PPF% subscale scores by functional group. Conclusions: The novel SMA EFFORT standardizes PPF ratings by anchoring activity to intensity and duration. Item and scale data insights will inform the next iteration, which will undergo additional investigation. The SMA EFFORT aims to improve upon current measures to better assess treatment impact on physical well-being across the SMA spectrum.

Background: Individuals with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) III walk independently, but experience muscle weakness, gait impairments, and fatigue. Although SMA affects proximal more than distal muscles, the characteristic pattern of selective muscle weakness has not been explained. Two theories have been proposed: 1) location of spinal motor neurons; and 2) differences in segmental innervation. Objective: To identify neuroanatomical models that explain the selective muscle weakness in individuals with SMA and assess the relationship of these models to ambulatory function. Methods: Data from 23 ambulatory SMA participants (78.2% male), ages 10–56 years, enrolled in two clinical studies (NCT01166022, NCT02895789) were included. Strength was assessed using the Medical Research Council (MRC) score; ambulatory function was measured by distance walked on the 6-minute walk test (6 MWT). Three models were identified, and relationships assessed using Pearson correlation coefficients and linear regression. Results: All models demonstrated a positive association between strength and function, (p < 0.02). Linear regression revealed that Model 3B, consisting of muscles innervated by lower lumbar and sacral segments, explained 67% of the variability observed in 6 MWT performance (β= 0.670, p = 0.003). Conclusions: Muscles innervated by lower lumbar and sacral segments, i.e. hip extensors, hip abductors, knee flexors and ankle dorsiflexors, correlated with and predicted greater ambulatory function. The neuroanatomical patterns of muscle weakness may contribute to a better understanding of disease mechanisms and enable delivery of targeted therapies.