Anne Schmutzler

Mrs. Anne Schmutzler


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

4Years (2023-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 April 2023 in Clinical Oral Investigations
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ARAngelika Rauch
Angelika Rauch
LLLea Lorenz
Lea Lorenz
Sven ReichSven Reich
Sven Reich
SHSebastian Hahnel
Sebastian Hahnel
ASAnne Schmutzler
Anne Schmutzler
OSOliver Schierz
Oliver Schierz
Objectives: To investigate the clinical performance of chairside fabricated tooth-supported posterior single crowns from lithium disilicate ceramic. Materials and methods: Thirty-four crowns (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) were inserted between 2006 and 2007 and again evaluated after 15 years. Survival and success rates were calculated according to Kaplan–Meier, and the quality of the crowns was evaluated by using modified United States Public Health (USPHS) criteria. Results: Twenty-two crowns were available for recall; six patients were defined as dropouts. The mean observation period was 15.2 years (± 0.2). Six failures occurred (1 technical/5 biological) resulting in a survival rate of 80.1%. The success rate was 64.2%. The roughness of the crowns increased (p = 0.021) and the majority of adhesive gaps were discolored (p = 0.001) in comparison to baseline. The color, tooth, and crown integrity remained stable over the follow-up period (p ≥ 0.317). Conclusion: The fabrication of tooth-supported lithium disilicate crowns using a chairside approach yielded acceptable long-term survival and success rates. Due to discoloration, the long-term use of dual-cure self-adhesive resin cements might result in unpleasing esthetic results. Clinical relevance: The performance of posterior lithium disilicate single crowns revealed excellent to good clinical quality and an acceptable number of events after 15 years of clinical service.

22 September 2023 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ASAnne Schmutzler
Anne Schmutzler
Catalina-Suzana StinguCatalina-Suzana Stingu
Catalina-Suzana Stingu
Elena GüntherElena Günther
Elena Günther
RLReinhold Lang
Reinhold Lang
FFFlorian Fuchs
Florian Fuchs
SHSebastian Hahnel
Sebastian Hahnel
Denture prostheses are an ideal and extensive reservoir for microorganisms to attach to their surfaces. The aim of the study was to elucidate interactions between materials for the fabrication of denture bases and the attachment of microorganisms, focusing on respiratory pathogens and Candida species. Specimens (6 mm × 1 mm) with a standardized surface roughness (Sa = 0.1 µm) were prepared from heat-pressed polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), CAD/CAM-processed PMMA, and CAD/CAM-processed polyether ether ketone (PEEK). The specimens were randomly placed in the vestibular areas of complete upper dentures in seven patients and were removed either after 24 h without any oral hygiene measures or after a period of four weeks. The microorganisms adherent to the surface of the specimens were cultivated and subsequently analyzed using mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF). The means and standard deviations were calculated, and the data were analyzed using a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey post-hoc test where appropriate (α = 0.05). There was a significant increase (p ≤ 0.004) in the total bacterial counts (CFU/mL) between the first (24 h) and the second (four weeks) measurements. Regarding quantitative microbiological analyses, no significant differences between the various materials were identified. Respiratory microorganisms were detected in all samples at both measurement time points, with a large variance between different patients. Only after four weeks, Candida species were identified on all materials but not in all participants. Candida species and respiratory microorganisms accumulate on various denture base resins. While no significant differences were identified between the materials, there was a tendency towards a more pronounced accumulation of microorganisms on conventionally processed PMMA.

5 December 2024 in Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MRMartin Rosentritt
Martin Rosentritt
ASAnne Schmutzler
Anne Schmutzler
SHSebastian Hahnel
Sebastian Hahnel
LKLaura Kurzendorfer-Brose
Laura Kurzendorfer-Brose
This in vitro study investigated how varying magnifications (5×, 10×, 20×, and 50×) using a confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM) influence the measured surface roughness parameters, Ra/Sa and Rz/Sz, of various materials with two surface treatments. Cylindrical specimens (d ≈ 8 mm, h ≈ 3 mm, n = 10) from titanium, zirconia, glass-ceramic, denture base material, and composite underwent diamond treatment (80 μm; wet) and polishing (#4000; wet; Tegramin-25, Struers, G). The surface roughness parameters (Ra/Sa, Rz/Sz) were measured with a CLSM (VK-100, Keyence, J) at 5×, 10×, 20×, and 50× magnifications. Line roughness (Ra/Rz) was measured along a 1000 μm distance in three parallel lines, while area roughness (Sa/Sz) was evaluated over a 2500 μm × 1900 μm area. The statistical analysis included ANOVA, the Bonferroni post hoc test, and Pearson correlation (SPSS 29, IBM, USA; α = 0.05). Ra/Sa and Rz/Sz showed significant differences (p ≤ 0.001, ANOVA) across magnifications, with values decreasing as magnification increased, highest at 5× and lowest at 50×. Titanium, zirconia, and glass-ceramic showed significant measured roughness values from 5× to 50×. Denture base material and composite had lower measured roughness values, especially after polishing. Line and area roughness varied significantly, indicating that magnification affects measured values. Standardizing magnifications is essential to ensure comparability between studies. A 50× magnification captures more detailed profile information while masking larger defects.