Hae Sun You

Hae Sun You


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

4Years (2023-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2023 in Journal of Korean Medical Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JKJong Hun Kim
Jong Hun Kim
HSHyeon Ju Shin
Hyeon Ju Shin
HYHae Sun You
Hae Sun You
YPYoonsun Park
Yoonsun Park
Ki Hoon AhnKi Hoon Ahn
Ki Hoon Ahn
KCKorea University Bloodless Medicine Center Scientific Committee
Korea University Bloodless Medicine Center Scientific Committee
Kim JH, et al. J Korean Med Sci. 2023 Feb;38(8):e64. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e64

6 March 2026 in Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
HSHye Won Shin
Hye Won Shin
YCYoon Ji Choi
Yoon Ji Choi
HYHae Sun You
Hae Sun You
JLJeong Hoon Lee
Jeong Hoon Lee
YJYookyung Jang
Yookyung Jang
Background: Postoperative delirium (POD) frequently occurs in elderly surgical patients and is associated with adverse outcomes. This review aimed to evaluate whether sugammadex, a selective neuromuscular blockade reversal agent, reduces postoperative delirium-incidence (POD-I) compared with neostigmine. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched up to May 2025 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized controlled trials (NRCTs) comparing sugammadex and neostigmine regarding to POD-I. Primary outcome was POD-I, with subgroup analyses according to postoperative period (within 24 hours vs after postoperative 1 day) and the type of anticholinergic coadministered with neostigmine (atropine vs glycopyrrolate). Secondary outcome was perioperative changes in Mini-Mental State Examination scores (preoperative vs postoperative). Analyses were performed separately for RCTs and NRCTs using RevMan 5.4. Results: Twelve studies (7 RCTs, n = 759; 5 NRCTs, n = 50,115) were included. In RCTs, sugammadex significantly reduced POD-I compared with neostigmine (risk ratio (RR), 0.67; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.49–0.91; I 2 = 0%; P = .008). Subgroup analysis of RCTs on POD-I within the 1st 24 hours postoperatively showed a significantly lower incidence in the sugammadex group (RR, 0.64; 95% CI, −0.45 to 0.90; P = .010). Subgroup analysis of RCTs by coadministered anticholinergics did not significantly influence POD-I (atropine: RR, 0.67; P = .06; glycopyrrolate: RR, 0.66; P = .06). In contrast, subgroup analysis of NRCTs on POD-I showed no significant difference between the groups (RR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.88–1.50; I 2 = 82%; P = .33). Preoperative and postoperative Mini-Mental State Examination scores in RCTs were similar between groups (preoperative: mean difference 0.03, P = .78; postoperative: mean difference 0.75, P = .12). Conclusion: Sugammadex is associated with a reduced incidence of POD compared to neostigmine, particularly within the 1st 24 hours after surgery, based on consistent findings from RCTs. This benefit was not observed in NRCTs. Further well-designed RCTs using standardized delirium assessments are required.