Breast cancer (BC) is the most frequent cancer diagnosed in women worldwide. This heterogeneous disease can be classified into four molecular subtypes (luminal A, luminal B, HER2 and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC)) according to the expression of the estrogen receptor (ER) and the progesterone receptor (PR), and the overexpression of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). Current BC treatments target these receptors (endocrine and anti-HER2 therapies) as a personalized treatment. Along with chemotherapy and radiotherapy, these therapies can have severe adverse effects and patients can develop resistance to these agents. Moreover, TNBC do not have standardized treatments. Hence, a deeper understanding of the development of new treatments that are more specific and effective in treating each BC subgroup is key. New approaches have recently emerged such as immunotherapy, conjugated antibodies, and targeting other metabolic pathways. This review summarizes current BC treatments and explores the new treatment strategies from a personalized therapy perspective and the resulting challenges.

The last decade has witnessed the emergence of international ethics guidelines discussing the importance of disclosing global and also, in certain circumstances, individual genetic research results to participants. This discussion is all the more important considering the advent of pharmacogenomics and the increasing incidence of ‘translational’ genetic research in the post-genomic era. We surveyed both the literature and the ethical guidelines using selective keywords. We then analyzed our data using a qualitative method approach and singled out countries or policies that were representative of certain positions. From our findings, we conclude that at the international level, there now exists an ethical duty to return individual genetic research results subject to the existence of proof of validity, significance and benefit. Even where these criteria are met, the right of the research participant not to know also has to be taken into consideration. The existence of an ethical duty to return individual genetic research results begs several other questions: Who should have the responsibility of disclosing such results and when? To whom should the results be disclosed? How? Finally, will this ethical ‘imperative’ become a legally recognized duty as well?

Adipose tissue is a complex endocrine organ, with a role in obesity and cancer. Adipose tissue is generally linked to excessive body fat, and it is well known that the female breast is rich in adipose tissue. Hence, one can wonder: what is the role of adipose tissue in the breast and why is it required? Adipose tissue as an organ consists of adipocytes, an extracellular matrix (ECM) and immune cells, with a significant role in the dynamics of breast changes throughout the life span of a female breast from puberty, pregnancy, lactation and involution. In this review, we will discuss the importance of breast adipose tissue in breast development and its involvement in breast changes happening during pregnancy, lactation and involution. We will focus on understanding the biology of breast adipose tissue, with an overview on its involvement in the various steps of breast cancer development and progression. The interaction between the breast adipose tissue surrounding cancer cells and vice-versa modifies the tumor microenvironment in favor of cancer. Understanding this mutual interaction and the role of breast adipose tissue in the tumor microenvironment could potentially raise the possibility of overcoming breast adipose tissue mediated resistance to therapies and finding novel candidates to target breast cancer.

Inherited mutations in the BRCA1 gene are known to confer a predisposition to breast and ovarian cancer. We have first characterized 19 sequence variants in the BRCA1 gene during mutation screening by direct sequencing using DNA samples from breast/ovarian cancer patients or obligate carriers. The frequencies of these sequence variants were then compared with those found in control populations of women. Among the 10 sequence variants showing an estimated frequency of the less common allele above 0.05, Q/R356, L/P871, E/G1038, K/R1183 and S/G1613 result in a change of amino acids, 2201C/T, 2430T/C and 4427C/T are silent mutations and the two others, 4209–141C/A and 5272+66A/G, are intronic polymorphisms. These frequent polymorphisms, with the exception of Q/R356, were in complete or significant pairwise linkage disequilibrium as evaluated in our control populations. With one exception (L/P871), none of these variants had statistically significant (P <0.05) differences in allele frequency between breast/ovarian cancer patients or obligate carriers and our control populations. Four rare sequence variants designated 710C→T, D693N, R841W and S1040N were found in both unaffected and breast/ovarian cancer populations, while the missense mutations M1008I, E1219D, R1347G, T1561I and M1628V were detected only once in our patient population. When a functional test is available, it will be important to determine the consequence on the BRCA1 activity of these rare sequence variants and missense mutations.