Aritra Bej

Dr. Aritra Bej

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2014 in Computers in Biology and Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ABAritra Bej
Aritra Bej
BIKASH SAHOOBIKASH SAHOO
BIKASH SAHOO
BSBanikalyan Swain
Banikalyan Swain
MBMadhubanti Basu
Madhubanti Basu
PJPallipuram Jayasankar
Pallipuram Jayasankar
MSMrinal Samanta
Mrinal Samanta

26 March 2015 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JMJitendra Maharana
Jitendra Maharana
BIKASH SAHOOBIKASH SAHOO
BIKASH SAHOO
ABAritra Bej
Aritra Bej
IJItishree Jena
Itishree Jena
APArunima Parida
Arunima Parida
Bijay Kumar BeheraBijay Kumar Behera
Bijay Kumar Behera
Nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-containing protein 1 (NOD1) and NOD2 are cytosolic pattern recognition receptors playing pivotal roles in innate immune signaling. NOD1 and NOD2 recognize bacterial peptidoglycan derivatives iE-DAP and MDP, respectively and undergoes conformational alternation and ATP-dependent self-oligomerization of NACHT domain followed by downstream signaling. Lack of structural adequacy of NACHT domain confines our understanding about the NOD-mediated signaling mechanism. Here, we predicted the structure of NACHT domain of both NOD1 and NOD2 from model organism zebrafish (Danio rerio) using computational methods. Our study highlighted the differential ATP binding modes in NOD1 and NOD2. In NOD1, γ-phosphate of ATP faced toward the central nucleotide binding cavity like NLRC4, whereas in NOD2 the cavity was occupied by adenine moiety. The conserved ‘Lysine’ at Walker A formed hydrogen bonds (H-bonds) and Aspartic acid (Walker B) formed electrostatic interaction with ATP. At Sensor 1, Arg328 of NOD1 exhibited an H-bond with ATP, whereas corresponding Arg404 of NOD2 did not. ‘Proline’ of GxP motif (Pro386 of NOD1 and Pro464 of NOD2) interacted with adenine moiety and His511 at Sensor 2 of NOD1 interacted with γ-phosphate group of ATP. In contrast, His579 of NOD2 interacted with the adenine moiety having a relatively inverted orientation. Our findings are well supplemented with the molecular interaction of ATP with NLRC4, and consistent with mutagenesis data reported for human, which indicates evolutionary shared NOD signaling mechanism. Together, this study provides novel insights into ATP binding mechanism, and highlights the differential ATP binding modes in zebrafish NOD1 and NOD2.

16 June 2015 in Molecular BioSystems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JMJitendra Maharana
Jitendra Maharana
Budheswar DehuryBudheswar Dehury
Budheswar Dehury
JSJyoti Ranjan Sahoo
Jyoti Ranjan Sahoo
IJItishree Jena
Itishree Jena
ABAritra Bej
Aritra Bej
SPSukanta Kumar Pradhan
Sukanta Kumar Pradhan
Nucleotide-binding and oligomerization domain-containing protein 1 (NOD1) and NOD2 are cytosolic pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs) composed of an N-terminal caspase activation and recruitment domain (CARD), a central NACHT domain and C-terminal leucine-rich repeats (LRRs). They play a vital role in innate immune signaling by activating the NF-κB pathway via recognition of peptidoglycans by LRRs, and ATP-dependent self-oligomerization of NACHT followed by downstream signaling. After oligomerization, CARD/s play a crucial role in activating downstream signaling via the adaptor molecule, RIP2. Due to the inadequacy of experimental 3D structures of CARD/s of NOD2 and RIP2, and results from differential experimental setups, the RIP2-mediated CARD–CARD interaction has remained as a contradictory statement. We employed a combinatorial approach involving protein modeling, docking, molecular dynamics simulation, and binding free energy calculation to illuminate the molecular mechanism that shows the possible involvement of either the acidic or basic patch of zebrafish NOD1/2–CARD/a and RIP2–CARD in CARD–CARD interaction. Herein, we have hypothesized ‘type-I’ mode of CARD–CARD interaction in NOD1 and NOD2, where NOD1/2–CARD/a involve their acidic surfaces to interact with RIP2. Asp37 and Glu51 (of NOD1) and Arg477, Arg521 and Arg529 (of RIP2) were identified to be crucial for NOD1–RIP2 interaction. However, in NOD2–RIP2, Asp32 (of NOD2) and Arg477 and Arg521 (of RIP2) were anticipated to be significant for downstream signaling. Furthermore, we found that strong electrostatic contacts and salt bridges are crucial for protein–protein interactions. Altogether, our study has provided novel insights into the RIP2-mediated CARD–CARD interaction in zebrafish NOD1 and NOD2, which will be helpful to understand the molecular basis of the NOD1/2 signaling mechanism.

29 July 2014 in Molecular BioSystems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JMJitendra Maharana
Jitendra Maharana
BSBikash Ranjan Sahoo
Bikash Ranjan Sahoo
ABAritra Bej
Aritra Bej
MPMahesh Patra
Mahesh Patra
Budheswar DehuryBudheswar Dehury
Budheswar Dehury
Bijay Kumar BeheraBijay Kumar Behera
Bijay Kumar Behera
Nucleotide binding and oligomerization domain 1 (NOD1), a cytoplasmic pattern recognition receptor (PRR) and is a key component for modulating innate immunity and signaling. It is highly specific to γ-D-Glu-mDAP (iE-DAP), a cell wall component of Gram-negative and few Gram-positive bacteria. In the absence of the experimental structure of NOD1 leucine rich repeat (NOD1-LRR) domain, the NOD signaling cascade mediated through NOD1 and iE-DAP interaction is poorly understood. Herein, we modeled 3D structure of zebrafish NOD1-LRR (zNOD1-LRR) through a protein-threading approach and structural integrity of the model was assessed using molecular dynamics simulations. Molecular interaction analysis of iE-DAP and zNOD1-LRR, their complex stability and binding free energy studies were conducted to anticipate the ligand binding residues in zNOD1. Our study revealed that His775, Lys777, Asp803, Gly805, Trp807, Asn831, Ser833, Ile859 and Trp861 situated in the β-sheet region of zNOD1-LRR could be involved in iE-DAP recognition, which correlates the earlier findings in human. Comparison of binding free energies of native and mutant zNOD1–iE-DAP complexes delineated His775, Lys777, Asp803, Ser833 and Ile859 as the pivotal residues for energetic stability of NOD1 and iE-DAP interaction. This study provides the first comprehensive description of biophysical and biochemical parameters responsible for NOD1 and iE-DAP interaction in zebrafish, which is expected to shed more light on NOD1 signaling and therapeutic applications in other organisms.

22 September 2014 in Angewandte Chemie International Edition
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JDJitendra K. Das
Jitendra K. Das
SMShyam S. Mall
Shyam S. Mall
ABAritra Bej
Aritra Bej
SMSujoy Mukherjee
Sujoy Mukherjee
The formation of partially unfolded intermediates through conformational excursions out of the native state is the starting point of many diseases involving protein aggregation. Therapeutic strategies often aim to stabilize the native structure and prevent the formation of intermediates that are also cytotoxic in vivo. However, their transient nature and low population makes it difficult to characterize these intermediates. We have probed the backbone dynamics of transthyretin (TTR) over an extended timescale by using NMR spectroscopy and MD simulations. The location and extent of these motions indicates that the backbone flexibility of TTR is a cause of dissociation and destabilization, both of which are responsible for fibril formation. Importantly, approximately 10 % of wild‐type TTR exists in an intermediate state, which increased to up to 28 % for pathogenic TTR mutants, for which the formation of the intermediate state is shown to be energetically more favorable compared to the wild type. This result suggests an important role for the intermediates in TTR amyloidosis.

9 May 2013 in Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BIKASH SAHOOBIKASH SAHOO
BIKASH SAHOO
BSBanikalyan Swain
Banikalyan Swain
MDManas Ranjan Dikhit
Manas Ranjan Dikhit
MBMadhubanti Basu
Madhubanti Basu
ABAritra Bej
Aritra Bej
MSMrinal Samanta
Mrinal Samanta