Natasha Kanagat

Ms. Natasha Kanagat

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
17 March 2023 in Vaccines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JSJessica Catherine Shearer
Jessica Catherine Shearer
ONOlivia Nava
Olivia Nava
WPWendy Prosser
Wendy Prosser
SNSaira Nawaz
Saira Nawaz
SMSalva Mulongo
Salva Mulongo
GCGrace Chee
Grace Chee
Background: The importance of immunization for child survival underscores the need to eliminate immunization inequalities. Few existing studies of inequalities use approaches that view the challenges and potential solutions from the perspective of caregivers. This study aimed to identify barriers and context-appropriate solutions by engaging deeply with caregivers, community members, health workers, and other health system actors through participatory action research, intersectionality, and human-centered design lenses. Methods: This study was conducted in the Demographic Republic of Congo, Mozambique and Nigeria. Rapid qualitative research was followed by co-creation workshops with study participants to identify solutions. We analyzed the data using the UNICEF Journey to Health and Immunization Framework. Results: Caregivers of zero-dose and under-immunized children faced multiple intersecting and interacting barriers related to gender, poverty, geographic access, and service experience. Immunization programs were not aligned with needs of the most vulnerable due to the sub-optimal implementation of pro-equity strategies, such as outreach vaccination. Caregivers and communities identified feasible solutions through co-creation workshops and this approach should be used whenever possible to inform local planning. Conclusions: Policymakers and managers can integrate HCD and intersectionality mindsets into existing planning and assessment processes, and focus on overcoming root causes of sub-optimal implementation.

13 April 2023 in Vaccines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GSGopal Krishna Soni
Gopal Krishna Soni
ABAnumegha Bhatnagar
Anumegha Bhatnagar
AGAnil Gupta
Anil Gupta
AKAmrita Kumari
Amrita Kumari
SKSonal Kakkar
Sonal Kakkar
RFRebecca Fields
Rebecca Fields
Mass vaccination, currently the most promising solution to contain communicable diseases, including COVID-19 requires collaboration between a variety of partners to improve the supply and demand and alleviate vaccine inequity. Vaccine hesitancy features in WHO’s list of top 10 threats to global health, and there is plethora of disinformation instigating conflict between COVID-19 vaccination drive and religious sentiments. Negotiating public health partnerships with FBOs (Faith Based Organizations) has always been challenging. A handful of faith leaders have always shown resistance to ideas such as child immunization, and family planning. Many others have been supportive on other fronts like helping people with food, shelter, and medical aid in the times of public health crisis. Religion is an important part of life for the majority of the Indian population. People confide in faith-based leaders in the times of difficulty. This article presents experiences from the strategic engagement with FBOs (entities dedicated to specific religious identities, often including a social or moral component) to promote uptake of COVID-19 vaccination, especially among the vulnerable and marginalized communities. The project team collaborated with 18 FBOs and more than 400 religious institutions to promote COVID-19 vaccination and build confidence for the vaccination program. As a result, a sustainable network of sensitized FBOs from diverse faiths was created. The FBOs mobilized and facilitated vaccination of 0.41 million beneficiaries under the project.

23 October 2020 in Global Health: Science and Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NKNatasha Kanagat
Natasha Kanagat
KKKirstin Krudwig
Kirstin Krudwig
KWKaren A. Wilkins
Karen A. Wilkins
SKSydney Kaweme
Sydney Kaweme
GPGuissimon Phiri
Guissimon Phiri
TTThang C. Tran
Thang C. Tran
Résumé en français à la fin de l9article. ABSTRACT Introduction: Limited information exists on health care workers’ (HCWs) perceptions about use of multidose vaccine vials and their preferences about doses per container (DPC). We present findings from qualitative studies conducted in Senegal, Vietnam, and Zambia to explore HCWs’ behavior regarding opening vials and their perceptions and preferences for the number of doses in vials of BCG and measles-containing vaccine (MCV). Zambia and Senegal currently offer MCV in 10-dose vials and BCG in 20-dose vials; 10-dose vials are used for both vaccines in Vietnam. Unused doses in vials of these reconstituted vaccines must be discarded within 6 hours. Methods: Key informant interviews (KIIs) were conducted with frontline HCWs in Senegal, Vietnam, and Zambia. In Senegal and Vietnam, the KIIs were conducted as part of broader formative research; in Zambia, KIIs were conducted in control districts using 10-dose MCV vials only and in intervention districts that switched from 10- to 5-dose vials during the study. During analysis, themes common to all 3 countries were synthesized. Critical themes relevant to country contexts were also examined. Results: HCWs in all 3 countries preferred containers with fewer doses for BCG and MCV to reduce wastage and increase the likelihood of vaccinating every eligible child. HCWs in Senegal and HCWs using 10-dose vials in Zambia reported sending unvaccinated children away because not enough children were present to warrant opening a new vial. In Vietnam, where sessions are typically held monthly, and in Zambia when the 5-dose vials were used, almost all HCWs reported opening a vial of MCV for even 1 child. Discussion: HCWs prefer vials with fewer DPC. Their concerns about balancing coverage and wastage influence their decisions to vaccinate every eligible child; and their perspectives are crucial to ensuring that all target populations are reached with vaccines in a timely manner. Key Findings Health care workers (HCWs) in all 3 countries preferred containers with fewer doses for reconstituted vaccines such as BCG and measles-containing vaccine. HCWs believed that containers with fewer doses of these vaccines could reduce wastage and missed vaccination opportunities. HCWs were more willing to open a vial for every eligible child when using containers with fewer doses. Key Implications Policy makers should consider HCW perspectives when deliberating a change in policy on vial size since HCWs have to balance concerns about open vial wastage with the guidance to open a vial to vaccinate every eligible child. Program managers should consider shifting to containers with fewer doses for vaccines without preservatives to assuage HCW concerns about opening vials for every eligible child while managing wastage.

24 August 2021 in Gates Open Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NKNatasha Kanagat
Natasha Kanagat
JCJeanne Chauffour
Jeanne Chauffour
JIJean-Fidèle Ilunga
Jean-Fidèle Ilunga
SRSylvain Yuma Ramazani
Sylvain Yuma Ramazani
JAJohn J.P. Ovuoraye Ajiwohwodoma
John J.P. Ovuoraye Ajiwohwodoma
DKDyness Kasungami
Dyness Kasungami
Background: This paper presents learnings from the Re-Imagining Technical Assistance for Maternal, Neonatal, and Child Health and Health Systems Strengthening (RTA) project implemented in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Nigeria from April 2018 to September 2020 by JSI Research & Training Institute, Inc. and Sonder Collective and managed by the Child Health Task Force. The first of RTA’s two phases involved multiple design research activities, such as human-centered design and co-creation, while the second phase focused on secondary analysis of interviews and reports from the design research. This paper explores the limitations of current technical assistance (TA) approaches and maps opportunities to improve how TA is planned and delivered in the health sector. Methods: We analyzed project reports and 68 interviews with TA funders, providers, and consumers to explore in greater detail their perspectives on TA, its characteristics and drawbacks as well as opportunities for improvement. We used qualitative content analysis techniques for this study. Results: The issues surrounding TA included the focus on donor-driven agendas over country priorities, poor accountability between and within TA actors, inadequate skill transfer from TA providers to government TA consumers, an emphasis on quick fixes and short-term thinking, and inadequate governance mechanisms to oversee and manage TA. Consequently, health systems do not achieve the highest levels of resilience and autonomy. Conclusions: Participants in project workshops and interviews called for a transformation in TA centered on a redistribution of power enabling governments to establish their health agendas in keeping with the issues that are of greatest importance to them, followed by collaboration with donors to develop TA interventions. Recommended improvements to the TA landscape in this paper include nine critical shifts, four domains of change, and 20 new guiding principles.

24 May 2023 in Vaccines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GSGopal Krishna Soni
Gopal Krishna Soni
SSSurbhi Seth
Surbhi Seth
SKSonal Kakkar
Sonal Kakkar
KSKapil Singh
Kapil Singh
AKAmrita Kumari
Amrita Kumari
RFRebecca Fields
Rebecca Fields
Early in 2021, India embarked on the uphill journey of the COVID-19 vaccination of the largest population group in the world in a prioritized manner and in the shortest possible time. Considering the endless variety of geography and diverse socio-economic demographic, religious, and community contexts, there was a high likelihood of certain population subgroups with known vulnerabilities facing inequities, which were anticipated to be further accentuated by a digital divide. This necessitated devising solutions for such communities in a localized manner to aid the local government in breaking the service access and uptake barriers with an inclusive approach. To bridge this vital gap, the Momentum Routine Immunization Transformation and Equity project implemented a three-tiered collaboration, viz., government, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and a wide range of vulnerable and at-risk communities, utilizing knowledge exchange and use of data. The project implemented localization strategies through the NGOs for community engagement in conjunction with government vaccination teams to universalize COVID-19 vaccination uptake up to the last mile. The collaboration resulted in reaching close to 50 million beneficiaries through messaging and facilitated the administration of more than 14 million vaccine doses, including 6.1 million doses for vulnerable and marginalized communities in 18 States and Union territories in India, along with suggesting implications for public health practice and research.

31 October 2022 in Global Health: Science and Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NKNatasha Kanagat
Natasha Kanagat
AAAdriana Almiñana
Adriana Almiñana
BDBelayneh Dagnew
Belayneh Dagnew
LOLisa Oot
Lisa Oot
ABAmare Bayeh
Amare Bayeh
ZAZenaw Adam
Zenaw Adam
Immunization programs reach more children and communities than any other health intervention, thus making immunization a promising platform for integrating other essential health services. There is a dearth of literature on integrating nutrition interventions, such as infant and young child feeding (IYCF) counseling and iron-folic acid (IFA) supplementation, into routine immunization services. To address this evidence gap, a 15-month pilot study (August 2019 to November 2020) tested the feasibility of integrating IYCF counseling and IFA supplement distribution into immunization service delivery in Ethiopia. The interventions focused on joint microplanning for integrated services (including estimating target populations for all services), revising client flows for service delivery, and providing on-the-job support to HWs for implementing and monitoring integrated service delivery. Findings suggest that planning for and delivering IYCF counseling and IFA supplementation with immunization services is feasible. Integrating these services provided opportunities for collaborative planning and enabled health workers (HWs) to offer multiple services to clients through 1 interaction. However, HWs felt that additional human resources were needed to manage integrated services, especially during integrated outreach and mobile service delivery. HWs also reported that communities appreciated accessing 2 services in 1 visit but expressed reservations about the longer wait times. Countries may consider expanding fixed and outreach immunization services to provide integrated service delivery provided that it is feasible, sustainable, of high quality, and incorporates the careful planning, follow-up, and increased human and financial resources needed to reinforce new practices and expand access to a broader array of health services. Key Findings Integrated planning helped to maintain focus on both programs; infant and young child feeding (IYCF) counseling was done more regularly. The service delivery experience was mixed. Health workers (HWs) initially struggled with the revised workflow, heavier workload, and data collection responsibilities. After receiving sustained technical assistance, they noted that their planning, reporting, and service delivery improved. HWs noted that providing integrated services was easier during facility-based sessions than outreach or mobile services due to the increased need for human resources, supplies, and data recording. Key Implications For countries seeking to integrate additional services into immunization, we recommend an assessment to gauge feasibility related to health system inputs. Once the decision to offer integrated services is made, the district-level integrated microplan will help map out program requirements. Adjustments necessary for effective integration can be identified during microplanning and strategies to ensure broad engagement of stakeholders, especially community members and technical partners. Countries may benefit from initially integrating IYCF counseling into facility-based immunization sessions since mobile and outreach sessions require more planning related to supplies, human resources, and data recording tools.