Background: Dose-escalated radiotherapy is known to improve progression free survival in patients with localized prostate cancer, and recent advances have led to the standardization of ultrahypofractionated stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) delivered in just 5-fractions. Based on the known effectiveness of the accepted though invasive 2-fraction treatment method of high-dose-rate brachytherapy and given the ubiquity of prostate cancer, a further reduction in the number of treatments of external-beam SABR is possible. This study aims to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and non-inferiority of generalizable 2-fraction SABR compared to the current 5-fraction regimen. Methods: 502 patients will be enrolled on this phase II/III randomized control trial. Eligible patients will have previously untreated low- or favorable intermediate-risk adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Patients will be randomized between standard SABR of 40 Gy in 5 fractions given every-other-day and 27 Gy in 2 fractions at least two days apart but completing within seven days. MRI-based planning, radiopaque hydrogel spacer insertion, and fiducial marker placement are required, and SABR will be delivered on either a standard CT-guided linear accelerator or MR-LINAC. The primary endpoint will be freedom from disease progression, with additional secondary clinical, toxicity, and quality of life endpoints. Discussion: This study will be the largest prospective randomized trial, adequately powered to demonstrate non-inferiority, comparing 2-fraction SABR to standard 5-fraction SABR for localized prostate cancer. As the protocol does not obligate use of an MRI-LINAC or other adaptive technologies, results will be broadly generalizable to the wider community. Trial registration: This trial is registered on Clinicaltrials.gov: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06027892.

Background/Objectives: Stereotactic radiotherapy (SABR) is a recognized standard treatment modality for localized prostate cancer, though data is limited regarding the risk of increased toxicity when including the elective nodes (ENI) for high-risk disease. Placement of a peri-rectal spacer can decrease the risk of toxicity to the rectum when administering high-dose prostate radiotherapy. Herein we present toxicity findings for patients who underwent five-fraction prostate SABR with ENI in a setting with peri-rectal spacing. Methods: Genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity data was analyzed for patients with ≥12 months of follow-up who were treated with curative-intent five-fraction SABR with ENI. A radiopaque hydrogel spacer was placed for all eligible patients. The primary endpoints were the three-month toxicity, which was measured using CTCAEv5, and quality of life (QoL), which was measured using EPIC 26. Secondary endpoints included intermediate-term GU and GI toxicity between 6 and 12 months. Univariable logistic regression was used to assess associations between baseline patient characteristics and the presence of a peri-rectal hydrogel spacer and GU and GI toxicity. Results: Among the 100 patients treated, 69 had grade group 4/5 disease and 40 had evidence of T3a/3b extension. The ENI dose was 25 Gy/5, and 78.9% of the patients received 40 Gy to the prostate, while the remainder were given 36.25–37.5 Gy. A total of 70% underwent placement of a radiopaque hydrogel spacer. GU toxicities of grades 1, 2, and 3 were reported in 28/22/1% of the patients, respectively, at three months; in 18/11/0% at six months; in 11/9/0% at nine months; and in 5/3/0% at twelve months. GI toxicities of grades 1 and 2 were reported in 14/0% of the patients at three months and 8/1% at six months, with all cases resolving by nine months. MCICs in the urinary incontinence, urinary obstructive, and bowel domains were reported in 5%, 18%, and 4% at three months; by twelve months, these values decreased to 2%, 2%, and 0%, respectively. The presence of a hydrogel spacer resulted in reductions in high and intermediate doses to the rectum and had a significant inverse association with short-term GI toxicity (HR: 0.09, CI: 0.27–0.35, p: 0.0004). Conclusions: In this prospective series, five-fraction SABR including ENI was well tolerated, and the presence of a hydrogel spacer was associated with a lower risk of rectal toxicity.

Introduction: Placement of a perirectal hydrogel spacer has been demonstrated to reduce the risk of rectal toxicity from prostate radiation. Practices vary regarding the timing of CT simulation after hydrogel placement, and the ideal schedule remains unknown.Methods: Thirty patients with localized prostate adenocarcinoma underwent transrectal ultrasound-guided placement of an iodinated SpaceOAR™ hydrogel prior to radiotherapy. Per evolving practice, 15 completed same-day simulation and 15 returned for simulation 1–2 weeks later. Hydrogel volume, perirectal distance, air-void volume, and rectal dosimetry per NRG GU005 were compared between CT simulation, 1st fraction Cone-Beam-CT (CBCT), and final CBCT.Results: CT simulation occurred 8.8 ± 2.4 days after placement in the delayed group, with no significant difference in the interval between simulation and 1st fraction between groups (p = 0.165). Greater observed de-creases in hydrogel volume (0.57 cc vs. 0.04 cc, p = 0.0002), and perirectal distance at both mid-gland (1.32 mm vs. 0.17 mm) and tallest point (2.40 mm vs. 0.04 mm) were seen on 1st-fraction CBCT in the same-day group (p = 0.0039; p = 0.0002). Per dosimetry recalculated on 1st fraction CBCT, five (D3 cc and D50%) versus one (D50%) rectal dose parameters were exceeded in the same-day and delayed groups, respectively, and 10 versus one parameters had a relative increase of ≥ 20%.Conclusion: Due to the evolving anatomic changes in the days following hydrogel placement, same-day simulation scanning may introduce unintended variability in rectal dosimetry at the time of prostate radiotherapy.

Background: Dose-escalated radiotherapy is known to improve progression free survival in patients with localized prostate cancer, and recent advances have led to the standardization of ultrahypofractionated stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) delivered in just 5-fractions. Based on the known effectiveness of the accepted though invasive 2-fraction treatment method of high-dose-rate brachytherapy and given the ubiquity of prostate cancer, a further reduction in the number of treatments of external-beam SABR is possible. This study aims to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and non-inferiority of generalizable 2-fraction SABR compared to the current 5-fraction regimen. Methods: 608 patients will be enrolled on this phase II/III randomized control trial. Eligible patients will have previously untreated low- or favorable intermediate-risk adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Patients will be randomized between standard SABR of 40 Gy in 5 fractions given every-other-day and 27 Gy in 2 fractions at least two days apart but completing within seven days. MRI-based planning, SpaceOAR Vue^TM insertion, and fiducial marker placement are required, and SABR will be delivered on a standard CT-guided linear accelerator. The primary endpoint will be freedom from disease progression, with additional secondary clinical, toxicity, and quality of life endpoints. Discussion: This study will be the largest prospective randomized trial, adequately powered to demonstrate non-inferiority, comparing 2-fraction SABR to standard 5-fraction SABR for localized prostate cancer. As the protocol does not necessitate use of an MRI-LINAC or other adaptive technologies, results will be broadly generalizable to the wider community. Trial registration: This trial was prospectively registered on Health.gov.il Health.gov.il identifier: MOH_2022-08-30_012007