Ursula Rauch

Prof. Dr. Ursula Rauch


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

4Years (2023-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
5 July 2023 in Clinical Research in Cardiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
URUrsula Rauch
Ursula Rauch
MPMarianna Puccini
Marianna Puccini
MPMarius Placzek
Marius Placzek
JBJan Beyer-Westendorf
Jan Beyer-Westendorf
KJKai Jakobs
Kai Jakobs
ULUlf Landmesser
Ulf Landmesser
Background: COVID-19 is associated with a prothrombotic state. Current guidelines recommend prophylactic anticoagulation upon hospitalization. Methods: COVID-PREVENT, an open-label, multicenter, randomized, clinical trial enrolled patients (≥ 18 years) with moderate to severe COVID-19 and age-adjusted d-dimers > 1.5 upper limit of normal (ULN). The participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either therapeutic anticoagulation with rivaroxaban 20 mg once daily or thromboprophylaxis with a heparin (SOC) for at least 7 days followed by prophylactic anticoagulation with rivaroxaban 10 mg once daily for 28 days or no thromboprophylaxis. The primary efficacy outcome was the d-dimer level and the co-primary efficacy outcome the 7-category ordinal COVID-19 scale by WHO at 7 days post randomization. The secondary outcome was time to the composite event of either venous or arterial thromboembolism, new myocardial infarction, non-hemorrhagic stroke, all-cause death or progression to intubation and invasive ventilation up to 35 days post randomization. Results: The primary efficacy outcome d-dimer at 7 days was not different between patients assigned to therapeutic (n = 55) or prophylactic anticoagulation (n = 56) (1.21 mg/L [0.79, 1.86] vs 1.27 mg/L [0.79, 2.04], p = 0.78). In the whole study population d-dimer was significantly lower at 7 days compared to baseline (1.05 mg/L [0.75, 1.48] vs 1.57 mg/L [1.13, 2.19], p < 0.0001). Therapy with rivaroxaban compared to SOC was not associated an improvement on the WHO 7-category ordinal scale at 7 days (p = 0.085). Rivaroxaban improved the clinical outcome measured by the score in patients with a higher baseline d-dimer > 2.0 ULN (exploratory analysis; 0.632 [0.516, 0.748], p = 0.026). The secondary endpoint occurred in 6 patients (10.9%) in the rivaroxaban group and in 12 (21.4%) in the SOC group (time-to-first occurrence of the components of the secondary outcome: HR 0.5; 95% CI 0.15–1.67; p = 0.264). There was no difference in fatal or non-fatal major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding between the groups. Conclusions: Therapeutic anticoagulation with rivaroxaban compared to prophylactic anticoagulation with a heparin did not improve surrogates of clinical outcome in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19. Whether initial rivaroxaban at therapeutic doses might be superior to thromboprophylaxis in patients with COVID-19 and a high risk as defined by d-dimer > 2 ULN needs confirmation in further studies. Graphical

5 May 2023 in Biomedicines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EGEmily Ghanbari Emily Ghanbari
Emily Ghanbari Emily Ghanbari
KJKai Jakobs
Kai Jakobs
MPMarianna Puccini
Marianna Puccini
LRLeander Reinshagen
Leander Reinshagen
JFJulian Friebel
Julian Friebel
URUrsula Rauch
Ursula Rauch
Inflammation-induced coagulopathy is a common complication associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We aim to evaluate the association of NETosis and complement markers with each other as well as their association with thrombogenicity and disease severity in COVID-19. The study included hospitalized patients with an acute respiratory infection: patients with SARS-CoV2 infection (COVpos, n = 47) or either pneumonia or infection-triggered acute exacerbated COPD (COVneg, n = 36). Our results show that NETosis, coagulation, and platelets, as well as complement markers, were significantly increased in COVpos patients, especially in severely ill COVpos patients. NETosis marker MPO/DNA complexes correlated with coagulation, platelet, and complement markers only in COVpos. Severely ill COVpos patients showed an association between complement C3 and SOFA (R = 0.48; p ≤ 0.028), C5 and SOFA (R = 0.46; p ≤ 0.038), and C5b-9 and SOFA (R = 0.44; p ≤ 0.046). This study provides further evidence that NETosis and the complement system are key players in COVID-19 inflammation and clinical severity. Unlike previous studies that found NETosis and complement markers to be elevated in COVID-19 patients compared to healthy controls, our findings show that this characteristic distinguishes COVID-19 from other pulmonary infectious diseases. Based on our results, we propose that COVID-19 patients at high risk for immunothrombosis could be identified via elevated complement markers such as C5.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MPMarianna Puccini
Marianna Puccini
KJKai Jakobs
Kai Jakobs
LRLeander Reinshagen
Leander Reinshagen
JFJulian Friebel
Julian Friebel
PSPhilipp-Alexander Schencke
Philipp-Alexander Schencke
URUrsula Rauch
Ursula Rauch
Galectin-3 is a beta-galactoside-binding lectin involved in inflammation and lung fibrosis and postulated to enhance thrombosis. In COVID-19, it is considered to be a prognostic marker of severity. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether galectin-3 is associated with thrombogenicity in COVID-19. Patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 (COVpos; n = 55) and patients with acute respiratory diseases, but without COVID-19 (COVneg; n = 35), were included in the study. We measured the amount of galectin-3, as well as other platelet and coagulation markers, and correlated galectin-3 levels with these markers of thrombogenicity and with the SOFA Score values. We found that galectin-3 levels, as well as von Willebrand Factor (vWF), antithrombin and tissue plasminogen activator levels, were higher in the COVpos than they were in the COVneg cohort. Galectin-3 correlated positively with vWF, antithrombin and D-dimer in the COVpos cohort, but not in the COVneg cohort. Moreover, galactin-3 correlated also with clinical disease severity, as measured by the SOFA Score. In patients with acute respiratory diseases, galectin-3 can be considered as a marker not only for disease severity, but also for increased hypercoagulability. Whether galectin-3 might be a useful therapeutic target in COVID-19 needs to be assessed in future studies.

2 October 2023 in Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NKNicolle Kränkel
Nicolle Kränkel
URUrsula Rauch
Ursula Rauch

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JFJulian Friebel
Julian Friebel
MWMax Wegner
Max Wegner
LBLeon Blöbaum
Leon Blöbaum
PSPhilipp-Alexander Schencke
Philipp-Alexander Schencke
KJKai Jakobs
Kai Jakobs
URUrsula Rauch
Ursula Rauch
Patients with first-diagnosed atrial fibrillation (FDAF) exhibit major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) during follow-up. Preclinical models have demonstrated that thrombo-inflammation mediates adverse cardiac remodeling and atherothrombotic events. We have hypothesized that thrombin activity (FIIa) links coagulation with inflammation and cardiac fibrosis/dysfunction. Surrogate markers of the thrombo-inflammatory response in plasma have not been characterized in FDAF. In this prospective longitudinal study, patients presenting with FDAF (n = 80), and 20 matched controls, were included. FIIa generation and activity in plasma were increased in the patients with early AF compared to the patients with chronic cardiovascular disease without AF (controls; p < 0.0001). This increase was accompanied by elevated biomarkers (ELISA) of platelet and endothelial activation in plasma. Pro-inflammatory peripheral immune cells (TNF-α+ or IL-6+) that expressed FIIa-activated protease-activated receptor 1 (PAR1) (flow cytometry) circulated more frequently in patients with FDAF compared to the controls (p < 0.0001). FIIa activity correlated with cardiac fibrosis (collagen turnover) and cardiac dysfunction (NT-pro ANP/NT-pro BNP) surrogate markers. FIIa activity in plasma was higher in patients with FDAF who experienced MACE. Signaling via FIIa might be a presumed link between the coagulation system (tissue factor-FXa/FIIa-PAR1 axis), inflammation, and pro-fibrotic pathways (thrombo-inflammation) in FDAF.

2 April 2026 in Cells
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
URUrsula Rauch
Ursula Rauch
JHJacqueline Heger
Jacqueline Heger
ULUlf Landmesser
Ulf Landmesser
ADAndrea Dorner
Andrea Dorner
Adenine nucleotide translocase (ANT) has traditionally been defined as the ADP/ATP exchanger of the inner mitochondrial membrane. However, accumulating mechanistic evidence reveals a substantially broader functional spectrum that extends beyond nucleotide transport. In this review, we integrate these advances into a unified conceptual framework that positions ANT isoforms as modulators of mitochondrial bioenergetics, quality control, and cellular communication. Beyond its canonical exchange activity, ANT influences permeability transition thresholds and membrane potential stability, participates in regulated uncoupling and redox control, and contributes to inner membrane organization and cristae integrity. ANT further modulates TIMM23-dependent protein import and PINK1–Parkin-mediated mitophagy, thereby shaping mitochondrial quality control decisions. In addition, ANT regulates mitochondrial nucleic acid release and inflammasome activation, linking bioenergetic imbalance to innate immune signaling. Emerging evidence for alternative subcellular localizations suggests that ANT-dependent signaling extends mitochondrial state information to extracellular and intercellular contexts. Collectively, these findings support an expanded view of ANT as a multifunctional modulator linking mitochondrial energetic state to stress adaptation, inflammatory signaling, and tissue-level communication.