Alexander A. Gusev

Prof. Dr. Alexander A. Gusev

Tambov State University, Tambov, Tambovskaya Oblast’, Russia
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
24 May 2022 in Nanomaterials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IVInna Vasyukova
Inna Vasyukova
OZOlga Zakharova
Olga Zakharova
Denis KuznetsovDenis Kuznetsov
Denis Kuznetsov
Alexander A. GusevAlexander A. Gusev
Alexander A. Gusev
MXenes are a family of two-dimensional (2D) composite materials based on transition metal carbides, nitrides and carbonitrides that have been attracting attention since 2011. Combination of electrical and mechanical properties with hydrophilicity makes them promising materials for biomedical applications. This review briefly discusses methods for the synthesis of MXenes, their potential applications in medicine, ranging from sensors and antibacterial agents to targeted drug delivery, cancer photo/chemotherapy, tissue engineering, bioimaging, and environmental applications such as sensors and adsorbents. We focus on in vitro and in vivo toxicity and possible mechanisms. We discuss the toxicity analogies of MXenes and other 2D materials such as graphene, mentioning the greater biocompatibility of MXenes. We identify existing barriers that hinder the formation of objective knowledge about the toxicity of MXenes. The most important of these barriers are the differences in the methods of synthesis of MXenes, their composition and structure, including the level of oxidation, the number of layers and flake size; functionalization, test concentrations, duration of exposure, and individual characteristics of biological test objects Finally, we discuss key areas for further research that need to involve new methods of nanotoxicology, including predictive computational methods. Such studies will bring closer the prospect of widespread industrial production and safe use of MXene-based products.

3 August 2015 in BioMed Research International
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
OZOlga Zakharova
Olga Zakharova
AGAnna Yu. Godymchuk
Anna Yu. Godymchuk
Alexander A. GusevAlexander A. Gusev
Alexander A. Gusev
SGSvyatoslav I. Gulchenko
Svyatoslav I. Gulchenko
IVInna A. Vasyukova
Inna A. Vasyukova
Denis KuznetsovDenis Kuznetsov
Denis Kuznetsov
Suspensions of Cu nanoparticles are promising for creating the new class of alternative antimicrobial products. In this study we examined copper nanoparticles of various sizes obtained by the method of wire electric explosion: nanopowder average size 50 nm (Cu 50) and 100 nm (Cu 100). The paper presents the complex study of the influence of physicochemical properties such as particle size and concentration of the freshly prepared and 24-hour suspensions of Cu nanoparticles in distilled water and physiological solution upon their toxicity to bacteriaE. coliM-17. Ionic solution of Cu2+and sodium dichloroisocyanurate was used for comparison study. It has been shown that decrease in the nanoparticle size leads to changes in the correlation between toxicity and concentration as toxicity peaks are observed at low concentrations (0.0001⋯0.01 mg/L). It has been observed that antibacterial properties of Cu 50 nanoparticle suspensions are ceased after 24-hour storage, while for Cu 100 suspensions no correlation between antibacterial properties and storage time has been noted. Cu 100 nanoparticle suspensions at 10 mg/L concentration display higher toxicity at substituting physiological solution for water than Cu 50 suspensions. Dependence of the toxicity on the mean particle aggregates size in suspension was not revealed.

8 March 2020 in Nanomaterials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Konstantin PikulaKonstantin Pikula
Konstantin Pikula
VCVladimir Chaika
Vladimir Chaika
AZAlexander Zakharenko
Alexander Zakharenko
ZMZhanna Markina
Zhanna Markina
Aleksey A. VedyaginAleksey A. Vedyagin
Aleksey A. Vedyagin
Kirill Sergeevich GolokhvastKirill Sergeevich Golokhvast
Kirill Sergeevich Golokhvast
Nanoparticles (NPs) have various applications in medicine, cosmetics, optics, catalysis, environmental purification, and other areas nowadays. With an increasing annual production of NPs, the risks of their harmful influence to the environment and human health is rising. Currently, our knowledge about the mechanisms of interaction between NPs and living organisms is limited. Additionally, poor understanding of how physical and chemical characteristic and different conditions influence the toxicity of NPs restrict our attempts to develop the standards and regulations which might allow us to maintain safe living conditions. The marine species and their habitat environment are under continuous stress due to anthropogenic activities which result in the appearance of NPs in the aquatic environment. Our study aimed to evaluate and compare biochemical effects caused by the influence of different types of carbon nanotubes, carbon nanofibers, and silica nanotubes on four marine microalgae species. We evaluated the changes in growth-rate, esterase activity, membrane polarization, and size changes of microalgae cells using flow cytometry method. Our results demonstrated that toxic effects caused by the carbon nanotubes strongly correlated with the content of heavy metal impurities in the NPs. More hydrophobic carbon NPs with less ordered structure had a higher impact on the red microalgae P. purpureum because of higher adherence between the particles and mucous covering of the algae. Silica NPs caused significant inhibition of microalgae growth-rate predominantly produced by mechanical influence.

1 January 2017 in Powder Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Gopalu KarunakaranGopalu Karunakaran
Gopalu Karunakaran
MJMatheswaran Jagathambal
Matheswaran Jagathambal
MVManickam Venkatesh
Manickam Venkatesh
Govindan Suresh KumarGovindan Suresh Kumar
Govindan Suresh Kumar
EKEvgeny Kolesnikov
Evgeny Kolesnikov
DKDenis Kuznetsov
Denis Kuznetsov

17 September 2021 in Nanomaterials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
OZOlga Zakharova
Olga Zakharova
EMElena Mastalygina
Elena Mastalygina
Kirill Sergeevich GolokhvastKirill Sergeevich Golokhvast
Kirill Sergeevich Golokhvast
Alexander A. GusevAlexander A. Gusev
Alexander A. Gusev
Graphene nanoribbons are a type of graphene characterized by remarkable electrical and mechanical properties. This review considers the prospects for the application of graphene ribbons in biomedicine, taking into account safety aspects. According to the analysis of the recent studies, the topical areas of using graphene nanoribbons include mechanical, chemical, photo- and acoustic sensors, devices for the direct sequencing of biological macromolecules, including DNA, gene and drug delivery vehicles, and tissue engineering. There is evidence of good biocompatibility of graphene nanoribbons with human cell lines, but a number of researchers have revealed toxic effects, including cytotoxicity and genotoxicity. Moreover, the damaging effects of nanoribbons are often higher than those of chemical analogs, for instance, graphene oxide nanoplates. The possible mechanism of toxicity is the ability of graphene nanoribbons to damage the cell membrane mechanically, stimulate reactive oxidative stress (ROS) production, autophagy, and inhibition of proliferation, as well as apoptosis induction, DNA fragmentation, and the formation of chromosomal aberrations. At the same time, the biodegradability of graphene nanoribbons under the environmental factors has been proven. In general, this review allows us to conclude that graphene nanoribbons, as components of high-precision nanodevices and therapeutic agents, have significant potential for biomedical applications; however, additional studies of their safety are needed. Particular emphasis should be placed on the lack of information about the effect of graphene nanoribbons on the organism as a whole obtained from in vivo experiments, as well as about their ecological toxicity, accumulation, migration, and destruction within ecosystems.

1 January 2017 in Journal of Hazardous Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
IMIvan Mikhailov
Ivan Mikhailov
SKSergey Komarov
Sergey Komarov
VLVera Levina
Vera Levina
Alexander A. GusevAlexander A. Gusev
Alexander A. Gusev
JIJean-Paul Issi
Jean-Paul Issi
DKDenis Kuznetsov
Denis Kuznetsov