Lost circulation in fractured formation is the first major technical problem that restricts improvements in the quality and efficiency of oil and gas drilling engineering. Improving the success rate of one-time lost circulation control is an urgent demand to ensure “safe, efficient and economic” drilling in oilfields all over the world. In view of the current situation, where drilling fluid loss occurs and the plugging mechanism of fractured formation is not perfect, this paper systematically summarizes the drilling fluid loss mechanism and model of fractured formation. The mechanism and the main influencing factors to improve the formation’s pressure-bearing capacity, based on stress cage theory, fracture closure stress theory, fracture extension stress theory and chemical strengthening wellbore theory, are analyzed in detail. The properties and interaction mechanism of various types of lost circulation materials, such as bridging, high water loss, curable, liquid absorption and expansion and flexible gel, are introduced. The characteristics and distribution of drilling fluid loss in fractured formation are also clarified. Furthermore, it is proposed that lost circulation control technology for fractured formation should focus on the development of big data and intelligence, and adaptive and efficient intelligent lost circulation material should be continuously developed, which lays a theoretical foundation for improving the success rate of lost circulation control in fractured formation.

A common problem associated with conventional gel breakers is that they can cause a premature reduction in gel viscosity at high temperatures. To address this, a urea-formaldehyde (UF) resin and sulfamic acid (SA) encapsulated polymer gel breaker was prepared via in situ polymerization with UF as the capsule coat and SA as the capsule core; this breaker was able to withstand temperatures of up to 120–140 °C. The encapsulated breaker was characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), and thermogravimetric (TG) analysis. Meanwhile, the dispersing effects of various emulsifiers on the capsule core, and the encapsulation rate and electrical conductivity of the encapsulated breaker were tested. The gel-breaking performance of the encapsulated breaker was evaluated at different temperatures and dose conditions via simulated core experiments. The results confirm the successful encapsulation of SA in UF and also highlight the slow-release properties of the encapsulated breaker. From experimentation, the optimal preparation conditions were determined to be a molar ratio between urea and formaldehyde (n_urea:n_formaldehyde) of 1:1.8 for the capsule coat, a pH of 8, a temperature of 75 °C, and the utilization of Span 80/SDBS as the compound emulsifier; the resulting encapsulated breaker exhibited significantly improved gel-breaking performance (gel breaking delayed for 9 days at 130 °C). The optimum preparation conditions determined in the study can be used in industrial production, and there are no potential safety and environmental concerns.