Background: Drug-resistant gram-negative bacteria (GNB) are a global public health threat, especially in intensive care units (ICU). This study explored the prevalence of drug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections in an ICU in Saudi Arabia. The appropriateness of the antibiotic therapies used and their ability to improve the clinical outcomes were also assessed. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted from 2015 to 2018 in the different ICUs of a tertiary-care hospital in Saudi Arabia. Positive cultures for multidrug-resistant (MDR), extensively drug-resistant (XDR), and pandrug-resistant (PDR) Enterobacteriaceae, including Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, and Enterobacter sp., were included. The primary outcomes involved microbiological cure and 30 days in-hospital mortality rate, while the secondary outcome included the length of hospital stay (LOS). Regression models were used to assess the relationship between appropriateness of the antibiotic therapy and clinical outcomes. Results: Of the 227 Enterobacteriaceae cultures included in this study, 60% were either MDR (n= 130) or XDR (n= 8) infections; no PDR Enterobacteriaceae cultures were identified. Majority of the patients were female (54%), and the average age was 60.1 ± 17.7 years. MDR/XDR cultures primarily comprised E. coli (51.4%), followed by K. pneumoniae (33%) and Enterobacter sp. (16%). Most commonly used antibiotics were piperacillin/tazobactam (53%), carbapenems (47%), and cephalosporins (21.3%). Antibiotic therapy was considered appropriate in only 85 of 138 (61.59%) patients. Microbiological cure rate was achieved in 40% of the cases, and in-hospital death rate was 84%. The average LOS was 27 days. Appropriateness of the antibiotic therapy prescribed could not predict any of the study outcomes. Conclusion: The study revealed a high prevalence of drug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections, which were associated with a high mortality rate. Therefore, it is essential to assess the effectiveness of antimicrobial stewardship program and infection prevention and control practices, particularly in critically ill patients.

Background and Objectives. Gram-positive infections are prevalent among cancer patients and vancomycin therapy is often initiated empirically. A typical vancomycin pharmacokinetics is observed in such patients. The aim of the study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of vancomycin in this patient population and compare it to that of normal population. Method and Results. The pharmacokinetics of vancomycin was examined retrospectively in two groups of patients — 18 cancer patients (age 43.4 ± 22.1 years) and 13 patients without cancer (age 48.5 ± 20.2 years). Following the administration of intermittent intravenous infusion of 15 mg/kg of vancomycin, peak and trough vancomycin serum concentration were determined after the third dose or at steady state as per standard of care. Vancomycin data were analyzed according to a one-compartment open model. Pharmacokinetic parameters such as clearance (CL), volume of distribution (Vd), and K elimination (ke) were calculated. Both Vd and CL were significantly higher in the cancer group (Mean Vd was 70 ± 45 L in the cancer group and 31.1 ± 8.3 L in the noncancer group, p-value 0.002; CL mean was 110.1 ± 42 mL/min in the cancer group and 71.2 ± 22.2 mL/min in the noncancer group, p-value 0.005). There was no significant difference in K elimination and half-life (t_1/2). Conclusion. Cancer patients may require higher than usual dosing regimens to ensure optimal therapeutic concentrations, since vancomycin CL and Vd is significantly higher in these patients, a dosing schedule as high as 60 mg/kg/day may be needed for cancer patients.

To compare the effectiveness and safety of aerosolized (AER) plus intravenous (IV) colistin with IV colistin alone in patients with nosocomial pneumonia (NP) due to multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacteria. This was a retrospective cohort study of adults with NP who received IV colistin alone or in combination with AER colistin. The primary endpoint was clinical cure at end of therapy. Secondary endpoints included microbiological eradication, in-hospital mortality and nephrotoxicity. In total, 135 patients were included in this study: 65 patients received AER plus IV colistin and 70 patients received IV colistin alone. Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. Clinical cure was achieved in 42 (65%) patients who received AER plus IV colistin and 26 (37%) patients who received IV colistin alone (P = 0.01). Among a total of 88 patients who were microbiologically evaluable, 27 (42%) patients who received AER plus IV colistin and 12 (17%) patients who received IV colistin alone attained favourable microbiological outcomes (P = 0.022). In-hospital mortality (43% vs 59%, P = 0.072) was higher in patients who received IV colistin alone, but the difference was not significant. Renal injury occurred in 31% of patients who received AER plus IV colistin and in 41% of patients who received IV colistin alone (P = 0.198). AER colistin can be considered as salvage therapy as an adjunct to IV administration for the treatment of patients with NP due to MDR Gram-negative pathogens.

Lack of recognition of labeled drug-drug interactions (DDIs) is a type of medication error of particular relevance to the treatment of psychiatric patients. Pharmacists are in a position to detect and address potential DDIs. This study aimed to explore pharmacists' role in the identification and management of DDIs among psychiatric patients in psychiatric outpatient clinics of a university-affiliated tertiary care hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. This study was a retrospective, cross-sectional medical chart review of patients visiting outpatient psychiatric clinics. It utilized medical records of patients who were taking any psychotropic medications and were prescribed at least one additional drug. The hospital Computerized Physician Order Entry system was used to identify DDIs and determine the pharmacists' interventions. The Beers criteria were applied to detect inappropriate prescribing among older patients. On average, the pharmacists intervened in 12 out of 213 (5.6%) cases of major or moderate DDIs. Older age, higher number of prescription medications, the severity of DDIs, and the utilization of lithium and anticoagulants were positively associated with the pharmacist undertaking an action. Future studies should explore the prevalence rate of harmful DDIs among psychiatric patients on a large scale and examine the effectiveness of different pharmacy policies in the detection and management of DDIs.

Background: Several pharmacy schools have implemented team-based learning (TBL) in their curriculum worldwide. Yet, TBL's effectiveness compared to traditional teaching in improving students’ outcomes in pharmacy education is yet to be assessed collectively. Thus, the aim of this meta-analysis is to compare the performance of pharmacy students following the implementation of team-based learning (TBL) in the pharmacy curriculum as opposed to traditional learning methods. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis included studies that assessed students’ performance after TBL was implemented in a pharmacy curriculum. Adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, the review conducted searches in Embase, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar until July 26, 2023. Results: A total of 11 studies comparing TBL against traditional teaching methods and assessing students’ performance were included. The pooled analysis, involving 2,400 students from 10 studies, demonstrated a mean difference (MD) in favor of TBL (MD = 2.27, 95 % CI [–0.85, 5.40]). However, notable heterogeneity was observed with an I² value of 82 %, and the observed difference did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion: TBL exhibited enhanced student performance in pharmacy education compared to traditional teaching, although the difference was not statistically significant. The meta-analysis findings support the use of TBL in pharmacy education for various pharmacy courses (pharmaceutical and clinical sciences courses) and for students at different levels. However, there is a need for more robust studies to comprehensively evaluate TBL, considering aspects such as students’ performance and engagement, skills development, and satisfaction.

Purpose: Cardiotoxicity is a common complication associated with anthracyclines. Little is known regarding the rate of anthracyclines-related acute and chronic cardiotoxicity and adherence to cardiac monitoring recommendations among cancer patients. Patients and Methods: A single-centre retrospective cohort study was conducted from 2015 to 2018 on patients with cancer, 18 years of age and older, on anthracyclines without a history of cardiovascular diseases. Data on demographic information, comorbidities, cardiovascular events, monitoring parameters, and treatment details were obtained. The primary outcome was the incidence of anthracyclines-related cardiotoxicity both acute and chronic. The secondary outcome was to determine adherence to guideline recommendations for monitoring anthracyclines-related cardiotoxicity based on the American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guidelines. Analyses included descriptive statistics and logistic regression. Institutional review board approval was obtained. Results: In 235 patients identified, 28.9% developed cardiotoxicity, of which 27.2% were acute, while chronic cardiotoxicity was observed in 8.9% of subjects. Patients who received optimal cardiac monitoring had a statistically significant higher odds of developing cardiotoxicities (odds ratio=2.65, confidence interval=1.32– 5.33). The risk of cardiotoxicity was higher in subjects with a history of diabetes mellitus, those using daunorubicin, and concomitant filgrastim use. Adherence to guideline recommendations was only achieved in 25.1% of the population. Echocardiography was the most common monitoring method used. Conclusion: In this study, there was a high incidence of anthracyclines cardiotoxicity and poor compliance with cardiac monitoring recommendations for cancer patients on anthracyclines, which underscores acute and chronic cardiotoxicity in this population.