Hans-Joachim Mentzel

Prof. Dr. Hans-Joachim Mentzel


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
24 February 2005 in Pediatric Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HMHans-Joachim Mentzel
Hans-Joachim Mentzel
CVClaudia Vilser
Claudia Vilser
MEMarcus Eulenstein
Marcus Eulenstein
TSTseela Schwartz
Tseela Schwartz
SVSusanna Vogt
Susanna Vogt
WKWerner A. Kaiser
Werner A. Kaiser

6 October 2004 in Pediatric Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HMHans-Joachim Mentzel
Hans-Joachim Mentzel
ADAndrea Dieckmann
Andrea Dieckmann
CFClemens Fitzek
Clemens Fitzek
UBUlrich Brandl
Ulrich Brandl
JRJürgen R. Reichenbach
Jürgen R. Reichenbach
WKWerner A. Kaiser
Werner A. Kaiser

29 July 2004 in European Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HMHans-Joachim Mentzel
Hans-Joachim Mentzel
CFClemens Fitzek
Clemens Fitzek
AEAnnegret Eichhorn
Annegret Eichhorn
SVSusanna Vogt
Susanna Vogt
FZFelix Zintl
Felix Zintl
JRJürgen R. Reichenbach
Jürgen R. Reichenbach

1 July 2018 in American Journal of Roentgenology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JRJessica Rodigas
Jessica Rodigas
HKHanne Kirsch
Hanne Kirsch
UJUlrike John
Ulrike John
PSPhilipp Seifert
Philipp Seifert
TWThomas Winkens
Thomas Winkens
HMHans-Joachim Mentzel
Hans-Joachim Mentzel
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study is to compare functional MR urography (MRU) with the results of ultrasound and radionuclide 99mTc-mercaptoacetyltriglycine (MAG3) scintigraphy in evaluating morphologic findings, split renal function, and urinary tract obstruction in pediatric patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Pediatric patients with proven congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract were included (n = 112). The morphologic findings of MRU were compared with previous diagnostic ultrasound findings. For evaluation of split renal function and urinary tract obstruction, MAG3 scintigraphy was used as a reference standard. RESULTS. MRU provided detailed morphologic information of the whole urinary tract for all 112 patients. In 94.6% of cases (n = 106), diagnostic findings could be verified, and in 5.4% of cases (n = 6), more detailed information could be gained. Equivalent split renal function showed good concordance between functional MRU and MAG3 scintigraphy. However, in kidneys with restricted ...

1 April 2002 in Pediatric Nephrology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HMHans-Joachim Mentzel
Hans-Joachim Mentzel
SVSusanna Vogt
Susanna Vogt
UJUlrike John
Ulrike John
WKWerner A. Kaiser
Werner A. Kaiser

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PSPD Ina Manuela Schüler
PD Ina Manuela Schüler
CHChristoph-Ludwig Hennig
Christoph-Ludwig Hennig
RBRika Buschek
Rika Buschek
RSRebecca Scherbaum
Rebecca Scherbaum
CJCollin Jacobs
Collin Jacobs
HMHans-Joachim Mentzel
Hans-Joachim Mentzel
Dental radiographs are valuable diagnostic aids for oral healthcare, but exposure to ionizing radiation carries health risks, especially in children due to their high radio-sensitivity. Valid reference values for intraoral radiographs in children and adolescents are still missing. This study aimed to investigate the radiation dose values and underlying justifications of dental, bitewing and occlusal X-rays in children and adolescents. Data from routinely executed intraoral radiographs between 2002 and 2020 with conventional and digital tube-heads were extracted from the Radiology Information System. The effective exposure was calculated from technical parameters and statistical tests performed. A total number of 4455 intraoral (3128 dental, 903 bitewing and 424 occlusal) radiographs were investigated. For dental and bitewing radiographs, the dose area product (DAP) was 2.57 cGy × cm2 and the effective dose (ED) 0.77 µSv. For occlusal radiographs, the DAP was 7.43 cGy × cm2 and the ED 2.22 µSv. Overall, 70.2% of all intraoral radiographs were dental, 20.3% bitewing and 9.5% occlusal radiographs. The most frequent indication for intraoral radiographs was trauma (28.7%), followed by caries (22.7%) and apical diagnostics (22.7%). Moreover, 59.7% of all intraoral radiographs were taken in boys, especially for trauma (66.5%) and endodontics (67.2%) (p ≤ 0.00). Girls were significantly more frequently X-rayed for caries diagnostics than boys (28.1% vs. 19.1%, p ≤ 0.00). The average ED of 0.77 µSv for intraoral dental and bitewing radiographs in this study was within the range of other reported values. The technical parameters of the X-ray devices were found at the lowest recommended levels to best limit the radiation exposure and to assure acceptable diagnostic efficacy. Intraoral radiographs were performed predominantly for trauma, caries and apical diagnostics—reflecting general recommendations for the use of X-rays in children. For improved quality assurance and radiation protection, further studies are necessary to determine the meaningful dose reference level (DRL) for children.