Qifeng Zhu

Dr. Qifeng Zhu


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
24 March 2022 in Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
QZQifeng Zhu
Qifeng Zhu
ZYZhengdu Yuan
Zhengdu Yuan
YXYeming Xu
Yeming Xu
JCJun Chen
Jun Chen
SNStella Ng
Stella Ng
JWJian'AN Wang
Jian'AN Wang

1 February 2021 in European Heart Journal - Case Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
QZQifeng Zhu
Qifeng Zhu
LSLars Sondergaard
Lars Sondergaard
XLXianbao Liu
Xianbao Liu
QZQifeng Zhu
Qifeng Zhu
An 86-year-old female was referred to the Cardiology Department for further treatment due to symptomatic severe aortic stenosis. Given her old age as well as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, coronary artery disease, hypertension, chronic kidney disease (Stage III), and frailty, the Heart Team recommended transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Transfemoral TAVI was smoothly performed with a 26 mm self-expanding valve VenusA (Venus Medtech, Hangzhou, China; self-expanding) using pre-dilatation of 20 mm Z-MED balloon (NuMED, Hopkinton, NY, USA) and post-dilatation of 22 mm Z-MED balloon. However, on the post-implantation aortogram, it was detected that the outflow part of the stent frame seemed to outreach the aortic wall (Video 1), and a transoesophageal echocardiography revealed a Stanford type-A dissection (Video 2), which on computed tomography scan extended to the abdominal aorta without compromising blood flow in the neck vessels or abdominal organs (Figure 1, Video 3). Since the patient was haemodynamic stable and surgical intervention associated with high risk, conservative treatment was undertaken. Under close surveillance, strict heart rate and blood pressure control were maintained with intravenous drugs during index hospitalization and oral medications after discharge. The patient was fortunately alive at 1-year and 2-year follow-up. Computed tomography angiogram at 1-year follow-up showed stable aortic dissection with partial thrombosis inside the false lumen (Figure 2, Supplementary material online, Videos S1 and S2 ).

2 November 2022 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
XLXianbao Liu
Xianbao Liu
DZDao Zhou
Dao Zhou
JFJiaqi Fan
Jiaqi Fan
HDHanyi Dai
Hanyi Dai
GZGangjie Zhu
Gangjie Zhu
JWJian’an Wang
Jian’an Wang
Evidence for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is scarce among patients with non-calcific aortic stenosis, and it is not known whether aortic valve calcification is associated with new cerebral ischemic lesions (CILs) that are detected by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. So, our study enrolled 328 patients who underwent transfemoral TAVI using a self-expanding valve between December 2016 and June 2021 from the TORCH registry (NCT02803294). A total of 34 patients were finally confirmed as non-calcific AS and the remaining 294 patients were included in the calcific AS group. Incidence of new CILs (70.6% vs. 85.7%, p = 0.022), number of lesions (2.0 vs. 3.0, p = 0.010), and lesions volume (105.0 mm3 vs. 200.0 mm3, p = 0.047) was significantly lower in the non-calcific AS group. However, the maximum and average lesion volumes were comparable between two groups. Non-calcific AS was associated with lower risk for developing new CILs by univariate logistic regression analysis [Odds ratio (OR): 0.040, 95% confident interval (CI): 0.18–0.90, p = 0.026] and multivariate analysis (OR: 0.031, 95% CI: 0.13–0.76, p = 0.010). In summary, non-calcific AS patients had a lower risk of developing new cerebral ischemic infarction after TAVI compared to calcific AS patients. However, new ischemic lesions were still found in over 70% of patients.

26 March 2026 in JACC: Asia
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JJJubo Jiang
Jubo Jiang
LWLihan Wang
Lihan Wang
PHPo Hu
Po Hu
KRKaida Ren
Kaida Ren
XLXinping Lin
Xinping Lin
XLXianbao Liu
Xianbao Liu
The Double Perclose ProGlide (Abbott Vascular Devices) is widely adopted device for closing the main arterial access in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TF-TAVR). Previous observational studies have compared the single device vs double device approach, yielding controversial results and highlighting a gap in clinical randomized controlled trials. The authors sought to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of single vs double Perclose ProGlide devices in patients undergoing TF-TAVR. The Single-Closure trial was been launched in 2024 (NCT06173115). It is an investigator-initiated, open-label, multicenter, noninferior, randomized controlled trial designed to compare the clinical outcomes of single vs double Perclose closure devices. Eligible participants include patients over 65 years of age with severe aortic stenosis and indicated for TF-TAVR. These patients are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the single Perclose closure group or the double Perclose closure group. The primary endpoint of the trial is the composite of access site or access-related major and minor vascular complications during hospitalization for the index procedure, as defined by the Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 criteria. This trial aims to compare the clinical outcomes of single vs double Perclose closure. Results of this trial may provide valuable insights into the optimal strategy for large-bore vascular closure.

8 October 2024 in JACC: Asia
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
QZQifeng Zhu
Qifeng Zhu
SNStella Ng
Stella Ng
XLXianbao Liu
Xianbao Liu
JWJian’an Wang
Jian’an Wang

20 February 2020 in medRxiv
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
JFJiaqi Fan
Jiaqi Fan
XFXian Fang
Xian Fang
CLChunhui Liu
Chunhui Liu
GZGangjie Zhu
Gangjie Zhu
CHCody R. Hou
Cody R. Hou
JWJian’an Wang
Jian’an Wang
Backgrounds: The risk of brain injury in bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) patients following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is currently unknown. Methods and Results: A total of 204 consecutive severe aortic stenosis patients who underwent TAVR were enrolled. 83 (40.7%) patients were BAV patients and the other 121 patients were tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) patients. All patients received diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) at baseline, 2 to 7 days after TAVR. Mean ages (mean ± SD: 75.8 ± 6.7 years vs. 78.9 ± 6.6 years, p = 0.004) and STS scores (6.0 ± 3.7 vs. 7.1 ± 4.2, p = 0.044) of the BAV and TAV patients were significantly different, while the stroke rates (2.4% vs. 1.7%, p = 0.704) were comparable between two groups. BAV patients were associated with higher number of new lesions (5.69 ± 6.22 vs. 3.50 ± 4.16, p = 0.008), total lesion volume [median(interquartile range): 290(70-930) mm 3 vs. 140(35-480) mm 3 , p = 0.008], and the volume per lesion [70.0(45.0-115.0) mm 3 vs. 57.5(24.5-93.0) mm 3 , p = 0.037] in DW-MRI. Moreover, the proportion of patients with lesions larger than 1cm 3 (28.6% vs. 10.9%, p = 0.005) and the number of new lesions in the middle cerebral arteries zone (1.46 ± 2.07 vs. 0.98 ± 1.84, p = 0.039) and intermediate zone between the anterior cerebral and middle cerebral arteries (ACA/MCA) (1.07 ± 1.68 vs. 0.50 ± 1.05, p = 0.007), and between the vertebral artery and basilar artery (VA/BA) (1.01 ± 1.35 vs. 0.77 ± 1.44, p = 0.033) were higher in BAV patients than in TAV patients. Conclusions: BAV patients may encounter more severe brain injuries not only due to greater number of lesions but also due to larger lesion size, especially in the ACA/MCA, MCA and VA/BA lesions zone.