Gabriele Di Giammarco

Prof. Dr. Gabriele Di Giammarco

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
31 August 2005 in The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ACAntonio Maria Calafiore
Antonio Maria Calafiore
GGGabriele Di Giammarco
Gabriele Di Giammarco
GTGiovanni Teodori
Giovanni Teodori
AIAngela L. Iacò
Angela L. Iacò
MPMarco Pano
Marco Pano
Michele Di MauroMichele Di Mauro
Michele Di Mauro

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LALaura Asta
Laura Asta
DFDaniele Falco
Daniele Falco
UBUmberto Benedetto
Umberto Benedetto
APAnnamaria Porreca
Annamaria Porreca
FMFatma Majri
Fatma Majri
GGGabriele Di Giammarco
Gabriele Di Giammarco
Cerebrovascular accident is the most ominous complication observed after cardiac surgery, carrying an increased risk of morbidity and mortality. Analysis of the problem shows its multidimensional nature. In this study, we aimed to identify major determinants among classic variables, either demographic, clinical or type of surgical procedure, based on the analysis of a large dataset of 580,117 patients from the UK National Adult Cardiac Surgical Audit (NACSA). For this purpose, univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were utilized to determine associations between predictors and dependent variable (Stroke after cardiac surgery). Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were constructed for each independent variable. Statistical analysis allows us to confirm with greater certainty the predictive value of some variables such as age, gender, diabetes mellitus (diabetes treated with insulin OR = 1.37, 95%CI = 1.23–1.53), and systemic arterial hypertension (OR = 1.11, 95%CI = 1.05–1.16);, to emphasize the role of preoperative atrial fibrillation (OR = 1.10, 95%CI = 1.03–1.16) extracardiac arteriopathy (OR = 1.70, 95%CI = 1.58–1.82), and previous cerebral vascular accident (OR 1.71, 95%CI = 1.6–1.9), and to reappraise others like smoking status (crude OR = 1.00, 95%CI = 0.93–1.07 for current smokers) or BMI (OR = 0.98, 95%CI = 0.97–0.98). This could allow for better preoperative risk stratification. In addition, identifying those surgical procedures (for example thoracic aortic surgery associated with a crude OR of 3.72 and 95%CI = 3.53–3.93) burdened by a high risk of neurological complications may help broaden the field of preventive and protective techniques.

17 May 2022 in JTCVS Techniques
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DLDror B. Leviner
Dror B. Leviner
CRCarlo Maria Rosati
Carlo Maria Rosati
MSMiriam von Mücke Similon
Miriam von Mücke Similon
Andrea AmabileAndrea Amabile
Andrea Amabile
DTDaniel J.F. M. Thuijs
Daniel J.F. M. Thuijs
JPJohn D. Puskas
John D. Puskas
We aimed to compare transit-time flow measurement (TTFM) parameters for on-pump (ONCAB) and off-pump (OPCAB) coronary artery bypass procedures. The database of the Registry for Quality AssESsmenT with Ultrasound Imaging and TTFM in Cardiac Bypass Surgery (REQUEST) study was retrospectively reviewed. Only single grafts were included (ie, no sequential or Y/T grafts). Primary end points were mean graft flow (MGF), pulsatility index (PI), diastolic fraction (DF), and backflow (BF). Unadjusted and propensity score-matching comparisons were performed. Of 1016 patients in the REQUEST registry, 846 had at least 1 graft for which TTFM was performed. Of these, 512 patients (60.6%) underwent ONCAB and 334 (39.4%) OPCAB procedures. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) during measurements was higher in the OPCAB group. After propensity score-matching, 312 well balanced pairs were left. In these matched patients, MGF was higher for the ONCAB versus the OPCAB group (32 vs 28 mL/min, respectively, for all grafts [P < .001]; 30 vs 27 mL/min for arterial grafts [P = .002]; and 35 vs 31 mL/min for venous grafts [P = .006], respectively). PI was lower in the ONCAB group (2.1 vs 2.3, for all grafts; P < .001). Diastolic fraction was slightly lower in the ONCAB group (65% vs 67.5%; P < .001). The backflow was also lower in the ONCAB group (0.6 vs 1.3; P < .001) with trends similar to MGF and PI for venous and arterial grafts. There were 21 (3.3%) revisions in the OPCAB group and 14 (2.1%) in the ONCAB group (P = .198). ONCAB surgery was associated with higher MGF and lower PI values, especially in venous grafts. Different TTFM cutoff values for ONCAB versus OPCAB surgery might be considered.

13 April 2018 in The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Cesare MantiniCesare Mantini
Cesare Mantini
MCMassimo Caulo
Massimo Caulo
DMDaniele Marinelli
Daniele Marinelli
PCPiero Chiacchiaretta
Piero Chiacchiaretta
ATArmando Tartaro
Armando Tartaro
GGGabriele Di Giammarco
Gabriele Di Giammarco

1 March 2016 in Journal of Cardiology Cases
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GGGabriele Di Giammarco
Gabriele Di Giammarco
MMMarziale Marchetti
Marziale Marchetti
MFMassimiliano Foschi
Massimiliano Foschi
DMDaniele Marinelli
Daniele Marinelli
DMDonato Micucci
Donato Micucci
Michele Di MauroMichele Di Mauro
Michele Di Mauro

11 August 2018 in Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GGGabriele Di Giammarco
Gabriele Di Giammarco
DMDaniele Marinelli
Daniele Marinelli