Amy S. Lee

Dr. Amy S. Lee


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

46Years (1981-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications

1 August 2001 in Trends in Biochemical Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ALAmy S. Lee
Amy S. Lee

15 April 2007 in Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ALAmy S. Lee
Amy S. Lee
Cancer cells adapt to chronic stress in the tumor microenvironment by inducing the expression of GRP78/BiP, a major endoplasmic reticulum chaperone with Ca2+-binding and antiapoptotic properties. GRP78 promotes tumor proliferation, survival, metastasis, and resistance to a wide variety of therapies. Thus, GRP78 expression may serve as a biomarker for tumor behavior and treatment response. Combination therapy suppressing GRP78 expression may represent a novel approach toward eradication of residual tumors. Furthermore, the recent discovery of GRP78 on the cell surface of cancer cells but not in normal tissues suggests that targeted therapy against cancer via surface GRP78 may be feasible. [Cancer Res 2007;67(8):3496–9]

25 April 2007 in FEBS Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MNMin Ni
Min Ni
ALAmy S. Lee
Amy S. Lee

1 June 2003 in Journal of Biological Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RRRamachandra K. Reddy
Ramachandra K. Reddy
CMChanghui Mao
Changhui Mao
PBPeter Baumeister
Peter Baumeister
RARichard C. Austin
Richard C. Austin
RKRandal J. Kaufman
Randal J. Kaufman
ALAmy S. Lee
Amy S. Lee
A large number of correlative studies have established that the activation of the unfolded protein response (UPR) alters the cell's sensitivity to chemotherapeutic agents. Although the induction of the glucose-regulated proteins (GRPs) is commonly used as an indicator for the UPR, the direct role of the GRPs in conferring resistance to DNA damaging agents has not been proven. We report here that without the use of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress inducers, specific overexpression of GRP78 results in reduced apoptosis and higher colony survival when challenged with topoisomerase II inhibitors, etoposide and doxorubicin, and topoisomerase I inhibitor, camptothecin. While investigating the mechanism for the GRP78 protective effect against etoposide-induced cell death, we discovered that in contrast to the UPR, GRP78 overexpression does not result in G1 arrest or depletion of topoisomerase II. Caspase-7, an executor caspase that is associated with the ER, is activated by etoposide. We show here that specific expression of GRP78 blocks caspase-7 activation by etoposide both in vivo and in vitro, and this effect can be reversed by addition of dATP in a cell-free system. Recently, it was reported that ectopically expressed GRP78 and caspases-7 and -12 form a complex, thus coupling ER stress to the cell death program. However, the mechanism of how GRP78, a presumably ER lumen protein, can regulate cytosolic effectors of apoptosis is not known. Here we provide evidence that a subpopulation of GRP78 can exist as an ER transmembrane protein, as well as co-localize with caspase-7, as confirmed by fluorescence microscopy. Co-immunoprecipitation studies further reveal endogenous GRP78 constitutively associates with procaspase-7 but not with procaspase-3. Lastly, a GRP78 mutant deleted of its ATP binding domain fails to bind procaspase-7 and loses its protective effect against etoposide-induced apoptosis.

24 March 2014 in Nature Reviews Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ALAmy S. Lee
Amy S. Lee