Matteo Vitali

Prof. Matteo Vitali

Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, P.le Aldo Moro, 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

29Years (1998-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 December 2021 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Carmela ProtanoCarmela Protano
Carmela Protano
Giuseppe BuompriscoGiuseppe Buomprisco
Giuseppe Buomprisco
VCvittoria cammalleri
vittoria cammalleri
RPRoberta Noemi Pocino
Roberta Noemi Pocino
DMDaniela Marotta
Daniela Marotta
Matteo VitaliMatteo Vitali
Matteo Vitali
Background: Formaldehyde, classified as a carcinogen in 2004, as of today is widely used in many work activities. From its classification, further studies were performed to evaluate its carcinogenicity. The aim of the systematic review is to update the evidence on occupational exposure to formaldehyde and cancer onset. Methods: The review, in accordance with the PRISMA statement, includes articles in English reporting original results of studies conducted on workers exposed to formaldehyde, considering all types of cancer, published from 1 January 2000 to 30 July 2021 and selected from the Pubmed and Scopus databases. The studies’ quality was assessed by the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Results: A total of 21 articles were included, conducted in different European, American, and Asian countries. The most investigated occupational areas are those characterized by a deliberate use of formaldehyde. Some studies evaluated all types of cancer, whereas others focused on specific sites such as thyroid and respiratory, lymphohematopoietic, or central nervous systems. The results showed weak associations with lung cancer, nasopharyngeal cancer, leukemia, and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Conclusions: The results demonstrate the need for further original studies carried out on representative samples of workers exposed to measured levels of FA. These studies should be designed to reduce the bias due to co-exposure to other carcinogens.

1 October 2017 in Environment International
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CPCarmela Protano
Carmela Protano
MMMaurizio Manigrasso
Maurizio Manigrasso
Pasquale AvinoPasquale Avino
Pasquale Avino
Matteo VitaliMatteo Vitali
Matteo Vitali

1 October 2011 in Environmental Health Perspectives
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CPCarmela Protano
Carmela Protano
Matteo VitaliMatteo Vitali
Matteo Vitali
A peer-reviewed open access journal published by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

Carmela ProtanoCarmela Protano
Carmela Protano
Pasquale AvinoPasquale Avino
Pasquale Avino
MMMaurizio Manigrasso
Maurizio Manigrasso
VVValerio Vivaldi
Valerio Vivaldi
FPFranco Perna
Franco Perna
Matteo VitaliMatteo Vitali
Matteo Vitali
Electronic cigarettes (e-cigs) were introduced into the market in 2006 and their technological features have evolved substantially over time. Currently, there are four different generations of e-cigs that are broadly considered less harmful than the use of combusted tobacco products although passive exposure to aerosols often occurs in public spaces and indoor environments. The study aim was to evaluate the levels of airborne particulate matter (PM) emitted during the use of all the four generations of e-cigs, testing different use modalities. PM10, PM4, PM2.5 and PM1 were measured through a Dusttrak ™ II Aerosol Monitor, for a total of 20 independent experiments. All tested e-cigs devices produced PM during their use, and PM10 was almost made of PM1 size fraction. In addition, we observed a progressive increase in PM emission from the first to the fourth generation, and an upward trend of PM1 emitted by the fourth generation e-cig with an increase in the operating power. The results showed that, whatever the model adopted, passive vaping does occur. This finding supports the need for legislative interventions to regulate the e-cigs use in public places and other enclosed environments, in order to protect the health of any subject who is potentially exposed.

12 November 2013 in Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Carmela ProtanoCarmela Protano
Carmela Protano
LZLoredana Zinnà
Loredana Zinnà
GSGiampaoli Saverio
Giampaoli Saverio
Vincenzo Romano SpicaVincenzo Romano Spica
Vincenzo Romano Spica
SCSalvatore Chiavarini
Salvatore Chiavarini
Matteo VitaliMatteo Vitali
Matteo Vitali

27 October 2021 in Indoor Air
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VCVittoria Cammalleri
Vittoria Cammalleri
RPRoberta Noemi Pocino
Roberta Noemi Pocino
DMDaniela Marotta
Daniela Marotta
CPCarmela Protano
Carmela Protano
FSFederica Sinibaldi
Federica Sinibaldi
Matteo VitaliMatteo Vitali
Matteo Vitali
The objectives of the systematic review were to: identify the work sectors at risk for exposure to formaldehyde; investigate the procedures applied to assess occupational exposure; evaluate the reported exposure levels among the different settings. An electronic search of Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science and ToxNet was carried out for collecting all the articles on the investigated issue published from January 1, 2004 to September 30, 2019. Forty-three papers were included in the review, and evidenced a great number of occupational scenarios at risk for formaldehyde exposure. All the included studies collected data on formaldehyde exposure levels by a similar approach: environmental and personal sampling followed by chromatographic analyses. Results ranged from not detectable values until to some mg m−3 of airborne formaldehyde. The riskiest occupational settings for formaldehyde exposure were the gross anatomy and pathology laboratories, the hairdressing salons and some specific productive settings, such as wooden furniture factories, dairy facilities and fish hatcheries. Notice that formaldehyde, a well-known carcinogen, was recovered in air at levels higher than outdoor in almost all the studied scenarios/activities; thus, when formaldehyde cannot be removed or substituted, targeted strategies for exposure elimination or mitigation must be adopted.