Neuropathic pain conditions severely and chronically affect the quality of life in a large human population, but the pain conditions are not adequately managed due to poor understanding of their underlying mechanisms. There is a pressing need for further research into this field to help develop effective and nonaddictive medications to treat neuropathic pain. This article first describes general clinical classification of pain, types and symptoms of neuropathic pain, and current practices of clinical management for neuropathic pain. This is followed by a discussion of various cellular and molecular mechanisms responsible for the development and maintenance of neuropathic pain. In this review, we highlight the loss of function of Kv7 voltage-gated potassium as a mechanism of neuropathic pain and the potential use of Kv7 channel activator as subsequent treatment.

Background: Chronic thoracic pain is commonly caused by thoracic facet dysfunction, intercostal neuralgia, surgery, or thoracic pain secondary to cancer and is present in approximately 15% of the population. Conventional treatments, including pharmacotherapy and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, are often ineffective and are often associated with poorly tolerated adverse effects. Cooled radiofrequency ablation (c-RFA) is a minimally invasive procedure that uses radiofrequency energy delivered through a probe to lesion the targeted nerve and provide significant and lasting relief. Methods: This study was a retrospective analysis of data extracted from UW-Health Electronic Medical Health records from October 2015 through June 2024. Patient data were collected, including diagnosis, pre-operative pain score, post-operative pain score, duration of relief, age, sex, and BMI. A two-tailed paired t-test was used to analyze the pre-operative and post-operative pain scores. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: A total of 111 thoracic c-RFA procedures were reviewed; 43 were excluded due to absent pre-operative or post-operative pain scores in medical records. A total of 68 procedures were included in the analysis, comprising 55 patients: 25 females and 30 males with an average age of 51.31 ± 18.22 years and a BMI of 29.79 ± 6.48 kg/m². Improvement in pain scores was reported in 77.94% (n = 53), 16.18% (n = 11) reported no change, and 5.88% (n = 4) reported worsening pain. Patients reported an average pre-operative pain score of 5.98 (M = 5.98, SD = 1.91) and an average post-operative pain score of 3.06 (M = 3.06, SD = 2.52); this achieved significance (p < 0.0001). Of the 77.94% (n = 53) charts that noted improvement, there is an average of 62.83 ± 28.48% reduction from their pre-operative pain scores. The average duration of relief lasted 11.85 ± 13.42 months. Conclusions: This study supports the efficacy and safety of c-RFA as a minimally invasive therapy for chronic thoracic pain refractory to conservative measures.

Neuromodulation is an alternative, minimally invasive treatment option that, at times, is used as a last resort for chronic pain conditions that are often refractory to other treatment modalities. Moreover, it offers promising prospects for individuals grappling with the formidable challenges posed by paraplegia and quadriplegia resulting from spinal cord injuries. This review article provides a comprehensive assessment of current treatment modalities specifically tailored for paraplegic and quadriplegic patients. We aim to evaluate the existing surgical and non-surgical interventions while delving into the role of neuromodulation in the restoration of function for individuals afflicted with these debilitating conditions. Additionally, we review the efficacy, limitations, and comparative outcomes of diverse treatment strategies available for the management of paraplegia and quadriplegia. Emphasizing the critical need for effective interventions beyond the initial 24 h surgical window, we elucidate the challenges associated with conventional therapies and their limited success in achieving comprehensive functional restoration. Central to this review is an in-depth exploration of neuromodulation’s transformative potential in ameliorating the deficits caused by spinal cord injuries. With a particular focus on spinal cord stimulation (SCS), we analyze and compare the outcomes of neuromodulation modalities and traditional treatment regimens, shedding light on the promising strides made in fostering sensory perception, motor function, and patient satisfaction.