Immunotherapy has changed the way many cancers are being treated. Researchers in the field of immunotherapy and tumor immunology are investigating similar questions: How can the positive benefits achieved with immunotherapies be enhanced? Can this be achieved through combinations with other agents and if so, which ones? In our view, there is an urgent need to improve immunotherapy to make further gains in the overall survival for those patients that should benefit from immunotherapy. While numerous different approaches are being considered, our team believes that drug delivery methods along with appropriately selected small-molecule drugs and drug candidates could help reach the goal of doubling the overall survival rate that is seen in some patients that are given immunotherapeutics. This review article is prepared to address how immunotherapies should be combined with a second treatment using an approach that could realize therapeutic gains 10 years from now. For context, an overview of immunotherapy and cancer angiogenesis is provided. The major targets in angiogenesis that have modulatory effects on the tumor microenvironment and immune cells are highlighted. A combination approach that, for us, has the greatest potential for success involves treatments that will normalize the tumor’s blood vessel structure and alter the immune microenvironment to support the action of immunotherapeutics. So, this is reviewed as well. Our focus is to provide an insight into some strategies that will engender vascular normalization that may be better than previously described approaches. The potential for drug delivery systems to promote tumor blood vessel normalization is considered.

Copper (Cu) is an essential element required by all living cells, where it supports critical enzymatic and signaling functions. In cancer, this balance is often disrupted, creating vulnerabilities that can be therapeutically exploited. Changes in Cu availability have been shown to influence key immunoregulatory pathways, including those involved in inflammation, cell death, and immune evasion. Notably, Cu can drive expression of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), contributing to immunosuppression, while also promoting immunogenic cell death, which stimulates adaptive immune responses. These dual effects highlight the complexity and therapeutic potential of Cu-based interventions, particularly in the context of immune modulation and toxicity. This review argues that Cu-based nanomedicines can selectively deliver high concentrations of bioactive Cu to tumor cells, inducing cell death and triggering adaptive immune responses. We summarize current knowledge on Cu’s roles in cancer and immunity, emphasizing recent insights into how these intersect through Cu-mediated modulation of anticancer immune pathways. Finally, we explore the clinical potential of Cu-based nanomedicines to convert immunologically “cold” tumors into “hot” ones, thereby improving responses to immunotherapy. Realizing this potential will depend on the thoughtful integration of Cu delivery approaches with existing immunotherapeutic strategies.

Copper (Cu) is an essential mineral required by all living cells, where it supports critical enzymatic and signaling functions. In cancer, this balance is often disrupted, creating vulnerabilities that can be therapeutically exploited. Changes in Cu availability have been shown to influence key immunoregulatory pathways, including those involved in inflammation, cell death, and immune evasion. Notably, Cu can drive expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), contributing to immunosuppression, while also promoting immunogenic cell death, which stimulates adaptive immune responses. These dual effects highlight the complexity and therapeutic potential of Cu-based interventions, particularly in the context of immune modulation and toxicity. This review argues that Cu-based nanomedicines can selectively deliver high concentrations of bioactive Cu to tumor cells, inducing cell death and triggering adaptive immune responses. We summarize current knowledge on Cu’s roles in cancer and immunity, emphasizing recent insights into how these intersect through Cu-mediated modulation of anti-cancer immune pathways. Finally, we explore the clinical potential of Cu-based nanomedicines to convert immunologically “cold” tumors into “hot” ones, thereby improving responses to immunotherapy. Realizing this potential will depend on the thoughtful integration of Cu delivery approaches with existing immunotherapeutic strategies.