Elizabeth Bryan

Dr. Elizabeth Bryan

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2009 in Environmental Science & Policy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EBElizabeth Bryan
Elizabeth Bryan
TDTemesgen T. Deressa
Temesgen T. Deressa
GGGlwadys A. Gbetibouo
Glwadys A. Gbetibouo
CRClaudia Ringler
Claudia Ringler

1 January 2013 in Journal of Environmental Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EBElizabeth Bryan
Elizabeth Bryan
CRClaudia Ringler
Claudia Ringler
BOBarrack Okoba
Barrack Okoba
CRCarla Roncoli
Carla Roncoli
SSSilvia Silvestri
Silvia Silvestri
MHMario Herrero
Mario Herrero

4 March 2012 in Regional Environmental Change
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SSSilvia Silvestri
Silvia Silvestri
EBElizabeth Bryan
Elizabeth Bryan
CRClaudia Ringler
Claudia Ringler
MHMario Herrero
Mario Herrero
BOBarrack Okoba
Barrack Okoba

11 June 2017 in International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PKPatricia Kristjanson
Patricia Kristjanson
EBElizabeth Bryan
Elizabeth Bryan
QBQuinn Bernier
Quinn Bernier
JTJennifer Twyman
Jennifer Twyman
RMRuth Meinzen-Dick
Ruth Meinzen-Dick
CDCheryl Doss
Cheryl Doss
Agricultural development efforts that do not address persistent gender gaps miss opportunities for greater impact. This synthesis reflects on key findings from integrated quantitative and qualitative analyses at the nexus of gender, agricultural development, and climate change. Linked farm household-, intrahousehold-, community-, and institutional-level data highlight significant and nuanced gender differences in adaptive capacity of individuals and communities to respond to climate change. The gender gap is also substantial in exposure to climate change and its impacts, and uptake of new practices that lower vulnerability. Women in agriculture will remain largely neglected by information and service providers unless their differing needs, access to, and control over resources are considered at policy and project design stage. Yet clear guidelines for addressing the needs of both men and women in different environments and agricultural systems are still lacking. Participatory ‘action research’ approaches with a focus on co-learning, and using innovative cell phone or social media-based approaches offer exciting new opportunities. Agricultural development decision-makers and project designers need to ‘design with gender in mind’. Equipping them with tools and knowledge of innovative gender-transformative practices and intervention options and creating accountability for serving women and men will be key.

1 April 2018 in Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AMAlam Hossain Mondal
Alam Hossain Mondal
EBElizabeth Bryan
Elizabeth Bryan
CRClaudia Ringler
Claudia Ringler
DMDawit Mekonnen
Dawit Mekonnen
MRMark Rosegrant
Mark Rosegrant

4 June 2022 in Global Food Security
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JNJemimah Njuki
Jemimah Njuki
SESarah Eissler
Sarah Eissler
HMHazel Malapit
Hazel Malapit
RMRuth Meinzen-Dick
Ruth Meinzen-Dick
EBElizabeth Bryan
Elizabeth Bryan
AQAgnes Quisumbing
Agnes Quisumbing