Background: Although surgery is the mainstay of curative-intent treatment for extrahepatic biliary tract cancer (EBTC), recurrence following surgery can be high and prognosis poor. The impact of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) relative to upfront surgery (US) among patients with EBTC remains unclear. Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases was utilized to identify patients who underwent surgery from 2006 to 2017 for EBTC, including gallbladder cancer (GBC) and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECC). Trends in NAT utilization were investigated, and the impact of NAT on prognosis was compared with US using a propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis. Results: Among 6582 EBTC patients (GBC, n = 4467, ECC, n = 2215), 1.6% received NAT; the utilization of NAT for EBTC increased over time (P_trend = 0.03). Among patients with lymph node metastasis, the lymph node ratio was lower among patients with NAT (0.18 vs. 0.40, p < 0.01). After PSM, there was no difference in overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) among patients treated with NAT versus US (5-year OS: 24.0% vs. 24.6%, p = 0.14, 5-year CSS: 38.0% vs. 36.1%, p = 0.21). A subgroup analysis revealed that NAT was associated with improved OS and CSS among patients with stages III–IVA of the disease (OS: HR 0.65, 95%CI 0.46–0.92, p = 0.02, CSS: HR 0.62, 95%CI 0.41–0.92, p = 0.01). Conclusions: While NAT did not provide an overall benefit to patients undergoing surgery for EBTC, individuals with advanced-stage disease had improved OS and CSS with NAT. An individualized approach to NAT use among patients with EBTC may provide a survival benefit.

Background/Aim: Currently, there is no classification system specializing in recurrent inguinal hernia (RIH) after open-surgery. For this reason, in this study we proposed one so as to understand the causes of RIH. Patients and Methods: Recurrence of IH after suture-repair was classified either as the tissue-loosening (TL) or the tissue-disruption (TD) type. Recurrence after open-mesh-repair was classified according to the locational relation between the hernia-defect and the mesh, as follows: i) mesh-distant (MD), ii) para-mesh (PM), iii) mesh-migration (MM), and iv) unclassifiable (UC). Fifty-two RIHs in 48 patients were classified, using this system, and analyzed. Results: This system-based classification led to the identification of: i) MM in 11 lesions, ii) PM in 11, iii) MD in 10, iv) TL in 7, v) TD in 5, and vi) UC in 8 lesions. The median time to recurrence (MTR) was significantly shorter in patients who had previously undergone a mesh-repair (n=34) compared to those who had undergone a suture-repair (n=13) [Mesh-repair vs. suture-repair MTR: 1.6 years (0.1-20) vs. 30 years (15-72), p<0.001]. MTR was significantly shorter in the following order: i) MM [0.5(0.1-2.0)]), ii) PM [2.6(0.2-15)]), iii) MD [11(0.5-20)], iv) TD [20(15-30)], and v) TL [40(30-72)] (p<0.001). Conclusion: This classification system helps understand the causes of RIH, leading to improved outcomes following open-surgery in the future.

Background Cirrhosis-associated portal vein thrombosis (CA-PVT) has been reportedly observed in 5-30% of cirrhotic patients. Moreover, the acute exacerbation of CA-PVT is likely to occur after certain situations, such as a status after abdominal surgery. Safety and efficacy of the direct-acting oral anticoagulant (DOAC) used for cirrhotic patients have been being confirmed. However, use of the DOAC as an initial treatment for CA-PVT appears still challenging especially in the early postoperative period after major surgery in terms of unestablished efficacy and safety in such occasion. Case presentation We herein report a case of the acute exacerbation of CA-PVT in the early postoperative period after abdominal surgery, which was successfully treated with DOAC, edoxaban used as an initial treatment. The patient was a 79-year-old Japanese male with alcoholic cirrhosis. The patient suffered choledocholithiasis and had a mural chronic CA-PVT extending from the superior mesenteric vein to the portal trunk. He underwent open cholecystectomy and choledochotomy. Early postoperative clinical course was uneventful except for abdominal distension due to ascites diagnosed on postoperative day (POD)7 when hospital discharge was planned. Contrast enhancement computed tomography (CE-CT) taken on POD 7 revealed the exacerbation of the CA-PVT. Despite recommendation for extension of hospital admission with low molecular weight heparin treatment, the patient strongly hoped to be discharged. Unwillingly, we selected DOAC, edoxaban, as an initial treatment, which was commenced the day after discharge (POD8). As a result, the remarkable improvement of the exacerbated CA-PVT was confirmed by the CE-CT taken on POD21. Any bleeding complications were not observed. Although a slight residue of the CA-PVT remains, the patient is currently doing well 4 years after surgery and is still receiving edoxaban. Any adverse effects of edoxaban have not been observed for 4 years. Conclusions A case of successful treatment of the acute exacerbation of CA-PVT with edoxaban was reported. Moreover, edoxaban has been safely administered in a cirrhotic patient for 4 years. The findings obtained from the present case suggest that DOAC can be used as an initial treatment for CA-PVT even in early postoperative period after major abdominal surgery.