Susana Rodríguez-Buriticá

Dr. Susana Rodríguez-Buriticá

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
10 December 2021 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LPLourens Poorter
Lourens Poorter
DCDylan Craven
Dylan Craven
CJCatarina Jakovac
Catarina Jakovac
MSMasha T. van der Sande
Masha T. van der Sande
LALucy Amissah
Lucy Amissah
BHBruno Hérault
Bruno Hérault
Resilient secondary tropical forests?: Although deforestation is rampant across the tropics, forest has a strong capacity to regrow on abandoned lands. These “secondary” forests may increasingly play important roles in biodiversity conservation, climate change mitigation, and landscape restoration. Poorteret al. analyzed the patterns of recovery in forest attributes (related to soil, plant functioning, structure, and diversity) in 77 secondary forest sites in the Americas and West Africa. They found that different attributes recovered at different rates, with soil recovering in less than a decade and species diversity and biomass recovering in little more than a century. The authors discuss how these findings can be applied in efforts to promote forest restoration. —AMS

1 March 2019 in Science Advances
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DRDanaë M.A. Rozendaal
Danaë M.A. Rozendaal
FBFrans Bongers
Frans Bongers
TAT. Mitchell Aide
T. Mitchell Aide
Esteban Alvarez-DávilaEsteban Alvarez-Dávila
Esteban Alvarez-Dávila
NANataly Ascarrunz
Nataly Ascarrunz
LPLourens Poorter
Lourens Poorter
Tropical secondary forests recover quickly (decades) in tree species richness but slowly (centuries) in species composition.

1 October 2020 in Ecological Indicators
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Camilo Andrés Correa AyramCamilo Andrés Correa Ayram
Camilo Andrés Correa Ayram
AEAndres Etter
Andres Etter
Jhonatan Julián Díaz-TimotéJhonatan Julián Díaz-Timoté
Jhonatan Julián Díaz-Timoté
SRSusana Rodríguez-Buriticá
Susana Rodríguez-Buriticá
WRWilson Ramírez
Wilson Ramírez
GCGermán Corzo
Germán Corzo

10 August 2020 in Nature Ecology & Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AHAndrew Hansen
Andrew Hansen
PBPatrick Burns
Patrick Burns
JEJamison Ervin
Jamison Ervin
SGScott Goetz
Scott Goetz
MHMatthew Hansen
Matthew Hansen
DADolors Armenteras
Dolors Armenteras

22 September 2023 in Heliyon
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DMDaniel Alexis Nieto Mora
Daniel Alexis Nieto Mora
SRSusana Rodríguez-Buriticá
Susana Rodríguez-Buriticá
PRPaula Rodriguez
Paula Rodriguez
JVJuan David Martinez Vargas
Juan David Martinez Vargas
CIClaudia Isaza
Claudia Isaza
Soundscape ecology is a promising area that studies landscape patterns based on their acoustic composition. It focuses on the distribution of biotic and abiotic sounds at different frequencies of the landscape acoustic attribute and the relationship of said sounds with ecosystem health metrics and indicators (e.g., species richness, acoustic biodiversity, vectors of structural change, gradients of vegetation cover, landscape connectivity, and temporal and spatial characteristics). To conduct such studies, researchers analyze recordings from Acoustic Recording Units (ARUs). The increasing use of ARUs and their capacity to record hours of audio for months at a time have created a need for automatic processing methods to reduce time consumption, correlate variables implicit in the recordings, extract features, and characterize sound patterns related to landscape attributes. Consequently, traditional machine learning methods have been commonly used to process data on different characteristics of soundscapes, mainly the presence–absence of species. In addition, it has been employed for call segmentation, species identification, and sound source clustering. However, some authors highlight the importance of the new approaches that use unsupervised deep learning methods to improve the results and diversify the assessed attributes. In this paper, we present a systematic review of machine learning methods used in the field of ecoacoustics for data processing. It includes recent trends, such as semi-supervised and unsupervised deep learning methods. Moreover, it maintains the format found in the reviewed papers. First, we describe the ARUs employed in the papers analyzed, their configuration, and the study sites where the datasets were collected. Then, we provide an ecological justification that relates acoustic monitoring to landscape features. Subsequently, we explain the machine learning methods followed to assess various landscape attributes. The results show a trend towards label-free methods that can process the large volumes of data gathered in recent years. Finally, we discuss the need to adopt methods with a machine learning approach in other biological dimensions of landscapes.

25 October 2019 in Scientific Data
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AHAndrew Hansen
Andrew Hansen
KBKevin Barnett
Kevin Barnett
PJPatrick Jantz
Patrick Jantz
LPLinda Phillips
Linda Phillips
SGScott Goetz
Scott Goetz
RCRafael De Camargo
Rafael De Camargo
Remotely sensed maps of global forest extent are widely used for conservation assessment and planning. Yet, there is increasing recognition that these efforts must now include elements of forest quality for biodiversity and ecosystem services. Such data are not yet available globally. Here we introduce two data products, the Forest Structural Condition Index (SCI) and the Forest Structural Integrity Index (FSII), to meet this need for the humid tropics. The SCI integrates canopy height, tree cover, and time since disturbance to distinguish short, open-canopy, or recently deforested stands from tall, closed-canopy, older stands typical of primary forest. The SCI was validated against estimates of foliage height diversity derived from airborne lidar. The FSII overlays a global index of human pressure on SCI to identify structurally complex forests with low human pressure, likely the most valuable for maintaining biodiversity and ecosystem services. These products represent an important step in maturation from conservation focus on forest extent to forest stands that should be considered “best of the last” in international policy settings.