Public health crises palpably demonstrate how social determinants of health have led to disparate health outcomes. The staggering mortality rates among African Americans, Native Americans, and Latinx Americans during the COVID-19 pandemic have revealed how recalcitrant structural inequities can exacerbate disparities and render not just individuals but whole communities acutely vulnerable. While medical curricula that educate students about disparities are vital in rousing awareness, it is experience that is most likely to instill passion for change. The authors first consider the roots of health care disparities in relation to the current pandemic. Then, they examine the importance of salient learning experiences that may inspire a commitment to championing social justice. Experiences in diverse communities can imbue medical students with a desire for lifelong learning and advocacy. The authors introduce a 3-pillar framework that consists of trust building, structural competency, and cultural humility. They discuss how these pillars should underpin educational efforts to improve social determinants of health. Effecting systemic change requires passion and resolve; therefore, perseverance in such efforts is predicated on learners caring about the structural inequities in housing, education, economic stability, and neighborhoods—all of which influence the health of individuals and communities.

Introduction: Effective cross-cultural care is foundational for mitigating health inequities and providing high-quality care to diverse populations. However, medical school teaching practices vary widely, and learners have limited opportunities to develop these critical skills. To understand the current state of cross-cultural education and to identify potential opportunities for improvement, we disseminated a validated survey instrument among medical students at a single institution. Methods: Learners across 4 years of medical school participated in the cross-cultural care assessment, using a tool previously validated with resident physicians and modified for medical students. The survey assessed medical student perspectives on (1) preparedness, (2) skillfulness, and (3) educational curriculum and learning environment. Cross-sectional data were analyzed by class year, comparing trends between school years. Results: Of 700 possible survey responses, we received 260 (37% response rate). Fourth-year students had significantly higher scores than first-year students (p<0.05) for 7 of 12 preparedness items and 4 of 9 skillfulness items. Less than 50% of students indicated readiness to deliver cross-cultural care by their fourth year in 9 of 12 preparedness items and 6 of 9 skillfulness items. Respondents identified inadequate cross-cultural education as the primary barrier. Discussion: Medical students reported a lack of readiness to provide cross-cultural care, with self-assessed deficiencies persisting through the fourth year of medical school. Medical educators can use data from the cross-cultural care survey to longitudinally assess students and enhance curricular exposures where deficiencies exist. Optimizing cross-cultural education has the potential to improve the learning environment and overall patient care.

Objectives: We sought to study the incidence of patient‐initiated communication after parotidectomy, identify patient and surgical factors associated with patient‐initiated communication, and evaluate trends and possible areas for improvement.Methods: A retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent parotidectomy without combined procedures from 2018 to 2022 in a single tertiary‐care institution was performed. We reviewed all patient communications documented within the electronic medical record within 30 days of discharge. We categorized patient communications as requiring an action by the surgeon, instruction by support staff, or reassurance.Results: A total of 363 patients were included. Most patients were women (55.4%), Caucasian (78.8%), and had an average age of 56 years ± 16. We found 123 (33.9%) patients initiated postoperative communications. Swelling (47.2%) was the most common concern followed by wound concerns (15.4%). Switching from planned inpatient to outpatient surgery increased (OR = 2.635; 95% CI = 1.200–6.146, p = 0.026) propensity for postoperative communication. We found 31 (25.2%) postoperative communications required an action by the surgeon, 40 (32.5%) required instruction by the support staff, and the other 52 (42.3%) required reassurance or clarification. Multivariate analysis showed swelling (OR = 6.5, CI = 2.2–19, p < 0.001), male sex (OR = 3.27, CI = 1.127–9.459, p = 0.029), previous smoking (OR = 3.468, CI = 1.181–10.185, p = 0.024), and cancer (OR = 6.862, CI = 1.757–26.804, p = 0.006) were predictive of requiring an action by the surgeon.Conclusions: This is the first study to evaluate patient‐initiated communication after parotidectomy and found it occurred 33.4% of the time. We found significant opportunities to improve perioperative care, enhance patient satisfaction, and reduce the overall burden on medical personnel.Level of Evidence: 4 Laryngoscope, 135:1105–1112, 2025

Objective: We evaluate the safety of outpatient parotidectomy. We evaluate factors that lead to planned admission and compare costs. We evaluate trends toward outpatient, and the outcomes of switching admission status, total versus superficial approach, and ambulatory versus hospital site.Study Design: Retrospective cohort study.Setting: Single tertiary academic center.Methods: Retrospective review of patients who underwent parotidectomy for benign tumors from 2018 to 2023.Results: Of 370 parotidectomies performed, there were a planned 162 admissions and 208 outpatient procedures. A travel time > 60 minutes (odds ratio [OR] = 0.487, confidence interval [CI]: 0.296‐0.803, P = .005) and total parotidectomy (OR = 0.448, CI: 0.226‐0.89, P = .022) decreased the odds of a planned outpatient procedure. In a multivariable model, longer operative time increased the odds of switching to inpatient (n = 29, OR = 1.02, CI: 1.007‐1.033, P = .002) and drain placement decreased the odds of switching to outpatient (n = 15, OR = 0.035, CI: 0.004‐0.298, P = .002). There was no significant difference in surgical complications, phone calls, clinic visits, readmission rates, or recurrence between outpatient and inpatient. This remained true when comparing surgical facility and superficial versus total parotidectomy. After COVID was declared an emergency, there was a trend toward outpatient parotidectomy (72.7% vs 48.9%, P < .001), but no change in complication rates. At our institution, outpatient parotidectomy saved $3838 compared to overnight admission.Conclusion: This study supports that outpatient parotidectomy is safe. This remained true for patients switching admission status, undergoing superficial or total parotidectomy, and having their operation at an ambulatory site. We demonstrate that institutions can safely increase outpatient parotidectomy rates and outpatient parotidectomy is cost effective.

Objective: We evaluated vessel counts in the pharyngeal mucosal margins of patients who underwent salvage laryngectomy to establish whether mucosal vascularity might predict fistula risk.Study Design: Retrospective cohort.Setting: Tertiary Medical Center.Methods: Patients who underwent salvage total laryngectomy at our institution between 1999 and 2015 were identified. Pharyngeal mucosal margins from laryngectomy specimens were evaluated histologically for each patient, and vessel counts were performed on 5 ×10 images. The primary outcome measure was fistula within 30 days of surgery and mean vessel counts were assessed as the principle explanatory variable.Results: Seventy patients were included and 40% developed a postoperative fistula. There was a large difference in the mean vessel count in patients who did develop fistula (48.6 vessels/×10 field) compared to those who did not (34.7 vessels/×10 field). A receiver operative characteristic curve found that a cutoff value of 33.9 vessels/×10 field provided a sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 62% to predict the likelihood of fistula occurrence (area under the curve = 0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.59‐0.83). In a binary logistic regression, patients with vessel counts greater than 33.9 had a 5‐fold increased risk of developing fistula (95% CI: 1.8‐16.45). Histologically, vessels in the pharyngeal mucosa of patients who developed fistulas were more disorganized.Conclusion: After salvage laryngectomy, patients with higher mean mucosal margin vessel counts are at increased risk of fistula. The mechanism is unknown, but the disorganization of the vasculature may contribute to poor wound healing. Vessel counting may allow for fistula risk stratification and guide postoperative care.

Importance: Previous work demonstrated postoperative hypothyroidism adversely affects wound healing in salvage laryngectomy. Currently, no studies have evaluated the association between wound healing and hypothyroidism in patients undergoing salvage oropharyngectomy. Objective: The primary objective was studying hypothyroidism and other factors associated with oropharyngocutaneous fistula development and fistula requiring reoperation within 30 days after salvage oropharyngectomy. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Tertiary academic center. Participants: All patients who underwent salvage oropharyngectomy for recurrent or second primary oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma between 2001 and 2017 after radiation or chemoradiation. Patients with no preoperative thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) values were excluded. Exposures: Salvage oropharyngectomy for recurrent or second primary oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Main Outcomes Measures: The principle explanatory variable was postoperative hypothyroidism, defined as TSH greater than 5.5 mIU/L. Univariate, bivariate, and binary logistical regression multivariate analysis was performed. Results: Fifty-three patients met inclusion criteria, 37.7% of patients developed hypothyroidism, 18.9% developed a fistula, and 9.4% required an operation to manage the fistula. Postoperative fistula rate was 35% among hypothyroid patients, which was significantly greater than among euthyroid patients (9.1%; P = .03). A fistula requiring reoperation occurred in 20% of hypothyroid patients compared with that of euthyroid patients (3%; P = .061). In a multivariate analysis, postoperative hypothyroid patients were at a 9.5-fold increased risk of developing a fistula [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.6-57.0, P = .013]. Additionally, postoperative hypothyroid patients were at 13.6-fold increased risk for development of a fistula requiring reoperation (95% CI 1.2-160.5, P = .038). Conclusions and Relevance: Postoperative hypothyroidism in patients who underwent salvage oropharyngectomy can predict fistula development and fistula requiring operative management. This study supports the treatment of hypothyroidism after surgery to reduce wound complications.