(1) Objectives: A divergence in self- and preceptor-evaluations of clinical skills has been noted during Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experiences (APPEs). The goal of this study was to determine the domains of overestimation of clinical skills by students during their APPE rotations. (2) Methods: Preceptor-assigned grades for APPE rotations from 2017–2022 were analyzed to identify instances of letter grade B or lower. The self- and preceptor-evaluations of APPE rotation were compared to determine the domains of divergence in evaluation between students and preceptors. (3) Results: Between 2017 and 2022, 305 student APPE rotations were graded as B or lower (~14%) by the preceptors. A statistically significant difference was noted between self- and preceptor-assigned letter grades across all practice settings including ambulatory patient care, community pharmacy, general medicine patient care, hospital/health system pharmacy, and special population patient care APPE rotations. In addition, examining the self- and preceptor evaluation rubric for these rotations revealed a statistically significant overestimation of clinical skills by students in all 9 domains of APPE evaluation. Finally, the divergence in the rating of clinical skills between student- and preceptor evaluation was found to be highest in the domains of planning and follow-up of patient care, disease knowledge, and communication with patients. (4) Conclusions: Students who fail to exhibit exemplary practice readiness during APPEs tend to overestimate their clinical skills in all domains of APPE evaluation. The results from our study support the need for additional avenues to assist in the identification of deficits in student learning before APPEs to increase their self-awareness (metacognition).

During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a large shift from face-to-face (FTF) to remote learning. Evaluating students’ perceptions of remote learning provides educators with opportunity to inform their instructional methods. This study sought to evaluate pharmacy students’ self-perceived (1) confidence, (2) preparedness, (3) satisfaction, and (4) motivation following remote vs. FTF classes. An electronic survey was distributed to six pharmacy student cohorts enrolled in the University of Findlay College of Pharmacy during April 2021 to measure the objectives. The Kruskal–Wallis, Mann–Whitney U, and Spearman’s rank correlation tests were used to analyze the data (alpha = 0.05). A total of 151 students completed the survey. While the responses differed among the cohorts, first-professional year students reported lower motivation to study (p = 0.008), engage (p = 0.008), satisfaction with content presentation (p = 0.05), preparedness for exams (p < 0.001), and confidence to communicate (p = 0.008) and succeed in a career (p < 0.001) when studying remotely vs. taking FTF classes compared to fourth-professional year students. Positive correlations were observed between students who felt motivated to engage and study (ρ = 0.501, p < 0.001), motivated to study and exam preparedness (ρ = 0.511, p < 0.001), satisfied with course material presentation and professor accessibility (ρ = 0.688, p < 0.001), and exam preparedness (ρ = 0.521, p < 0.001), and felt prepared for exams and able to succeed in a pharmacy career (ρ = 0.573, p < 0.001). Taking the above results into consideration, pharmacy educators may designate more time and instructional support to first-professional year students in an effort to improve students’ perceptions of motivation, satisfaction, confidence, and preparedness.

Background: A weekly drug quiz policy was implemented in a pharmacy skills laboratory course. Objective: To examine student performance and perspective on weekly top drug information assessments. Methods: Students in the second- and third-professional year of the pharmacy programme were assessed on top drug information through weekly drug quizzes and a final top drug exam in their respective pharmacy skills lab courses. Correlation between student performance in drug quizzes and major assessments in their pharmacy coursework was measured using the Spearman rank correlation analysis. Statistically significant change in student opinion through the term was determined using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Results: Student scores on weekly quizzes and the final drug exam ranged between 85-99%. A strong positive (ρ ≥ 0.7), significant (p < 0.001) correlation was observed between student performance on their drug information assessments and their scores in all pharmacy courses. Within the second-professional year, a significant improvement (17.7%) in students’ perceived ability for the weekly quizzes to positively impact their course grades in the modules (p = 0.03). Student confidence in matching brand/generic drugs and identifying drugs’ therapeutic classes improved over the term (p < 0.01). Conclusion: Students were overall accepting and had a predominantly positive perspective regarding the repeated top drug information assessment policy.

A capstone course often serves as the final checkpoint of student readiness before the commencement of experiential training. The purpose of this study was to determine if the assessment components from the capstone course can serve as predictors of student performance during their Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experiences (APPEs). Student data was analyzed to observe the correlation between performance in the Pharmacy Curriculum Outcomes Assessment (PCOA), student performance in the capstone course, and the overall grade point average (GPA) earned during APPEs. Spearman rank correlation analysis, multiple linear regression, and Mann-Whitney U test were used for statistical analysis. A statistically significant positive correlation was observed between the overall APPE GPA and students’ capstone course grade, top drug competency exam score, pharmacy calculation competency exam score, and PCOA exam score. A significant regression equation was obtained during the analysis: (F(5, 97) = 5.62, p < 0.001), with an R2 = 0.225 (adjusted R2 = 0.185). In the linear regression model, capstone GPA emerged as a significant predictor (β = 0.155; p = 0.019) of APPE GPA amongst the tested variables. Additionally, students scoring < 73% on the top drug competency exam in the capstone course or less than the reference group in the PCOA exam were found to have significantly lower GPA during their APPEs compared to other students. Performance on the top drug competency exam and the PCOA exam can serve as potential predictors of success during APPEs.