Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) and non-affective psychoses such as schizophrenia are commonly acknowledged as discrete entities. Previous research has revealed evidence of high comorbidity between these conditions, but their differential diagnosis proves difficult in routine clinical practice due to the similarities between core symptoms of each disorder. The prevalence of comorbid non-affective psychoses in individuals with ASD is uncertain, with studies reporting rates ranging from 0% to 61.5%. We therefore performed a systematic review and pooled analysis of the available studies reporting the prevalence of non-affective psychosis in ASD. Fourteen studies, including a total of 1708 participants, were included, with a weighted pooled prevalence assessed at 9.5% (95% CI 2.6 to 16.0). In view of significant heterogeneity amongst the studies, subgroup analyses were conducted. We observed higher prevalence of non-affective psychoses among ASD inpatients versus outpatients, when operationalised criteria were used, and in studies with smaller sample sizes, whereas the figures were comparable between children and adults with ASD. Our results suggest that future studies involving larger samples should implement both operationalized criteria and specific scales for the assessment of psychotic symptoms in individuals with ASD. A deeper understanding of both differential and comorbid features of ASD and non-affective psychosis will be required for the development of optimized clinical management protocols.

BACKGROUND: Recent literature suggests viscoelastic test (VET)-guided transfusion management could be associated with reduced blood product administration in patients undergoing liver transplantation. OBJECTIVE(S): To assess the effectiveness of coagulation management guided by VETs compared with conventional coagulation tests (CCTs) in reducing blood product transfusion in patients undergoing liver transplantation. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised (RCTs) and nonrandomised clinical trials performed according to PRISMA guidelines. The protocol was previously published (PROSPERO: CRD42021230213) DATA SOURCES: The Cochrane Central Library, PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase and the Transfusion Evidence Library were searched up to 30^th January 2022. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Setting: operating room. Patients: liver transplantation recipients. Intervention: use of VETs versus CCTs. Main outcome measures: the primary outcome was the mean number of transfused units for each blood product including red blood cells (RBCs), fresh frozen plasma (FFP), platelets (PLTs) and cryoprecipitate. Secondary outcomes included mortality rate, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay (LOS). RESULTS: Seventeen studies (n = 5345 patients), 15 observational and two RCTs, were included in this review. There was a mean difference reduction in RBCs [mean difference: −1.40, 95% confidence interval (95% CI), −1.87 to −0.92; P < 0.001, I ² = 61%) and FFP units (mean difference: −2.98, 95% CI, −4.61 to −1.35; P = < 0.001; I ² = 98%) transfused in the VETs group compared with the CCTs one. A greater amount of cryoprecipitate was administered in the VETs group (mean difference: 2.71, 95% CI, 0.84 to 4.58; P = 0.005; I ² = 91%). There was no significant difference in the mean number of PLT units, mortality, hospital and ICU-LOS. CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis demonstrated that VETs implementation was associated with reduced RBC and FFP consumption in liver transplantation patients without effects on mortality and hospital and ICU-LOS. The certainty of evidence ranged from moderate to very low. Further well conducted RCTs are needed to improve the certainty of evidence.

Recent literature suggests that the withdrawal of remifentanil (RF) infusion can be associated with hyperalgesia in clinical and nonclinical settings. We performed a systematic review and a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with cross-over design, to assess the effect of discontinuing RF infusion on pain intensity and areas of hyperalgesia and allodynia in healthy volunteers. Nine studies were included. The intervention treatment consisted in RF infusion that was compared with placebo (saline solution). The primary outcome was pain intensity assessment at 30 ± 15 minutes after RF or placebo discontinuation, assessed by any pain scale and using any quantitative sensory testing. Moreover, postwithdrawal pain scores were compared with baseline scores in each treatment. Secondary outcomes included the areas (% of basal values) of hyperalgesia and allodynia. Subjects during RF treatment reported higher pain scores after discontinuation than during treatment with placebo [standardized mean difference (SMD): 0.50, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.03-0.97; P = 0.04, I² = 71%]. A significant decrease in pain scores, compared with baseline values, was found in the placebo treatment (SMD: −0.87, 95% CI: −1.61 to −0.13; P = 0.02, I² = 87%), but not in the RF treatment (SMD: −0.28, 95% CI: −1.18 to 0.62; P = 0.54, I² = 91%). The area of hyperalgesia was larger after RF withdrawal (SMD: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.27-0.84; P = 0.001; I² = 0%). The area of allodynia did not vary between treatments. These findings suggest that the withdrawal of RF induces a mild but nonclinically relevant degree of hyperalgesia in HVs, likely linked to a reduced pain threshold.

The risk/benefit ratio of using prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs) to correct coagulation defects in patients with end-stage liver disease is still unclear. The primary aim of this review was to assess the clinical effectiveness of PCCs in reducing transfusion requirements in patients undergoing liver transplantation (LT). This systematic review of non-randomized clinical trials was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The protocol was previously registered (PROSPERO:CRD42022357627). The primary outcome was the mean number of transfused units for each blood product, including red blood cells (RBCs), fresh frozen plasma, platelets, and cryoprecipitate. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of arterial thrombosis, acute kidney injury, and haemodialysis, and hospital and intensive care unit length of stay. There were 638 patients from 4 studies considered for meta-analysis. PCC use did not affect blood product transfusions. Sensitivity analysis, including only four-factor PCC, showed a significant reduction of RBC effect size (MD: 2.06; 95%CI: 1.27–2.84) with no true heterogeneity. No significant differences in secondary outcomes were detected. Preliminary evidence indicated a lack of PCC efficacy in reducing blood product transfusions during LT, but further investigation is needed. In particular, future studies should be tailored to establish if LT patients will likely benefit from four-factor PCC therapy.

Background: Fresh frozen plasma (FFP) transfusions have been the mainstay of hemostatic intervention for the treatment of bleeding and coagulation abnormalities arising during liver transplantation (LT) for decades. However, numerous clinical studies showed that FFP has many side effects, including the risk of pathogen transmission, transfusion-associated circulatory overload (TACO), transfusion-related immunomodulation (TRIM), and transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI). These adverse events are particularly challenging in patients undergoing LT, who often suffer from severe portal hypertension, poor renal function and coexisting cardiac disease.The aims of this review are to summarize the pharmacological properties of currently available PCCs, to represent the theoretical benefits and the possible risks related to the use of these drugs in patients undergoing LT, and, finally, to review the current literature on the topic in order to highlight the evidence that currently supports PCC use in LT patients. Methods: The current literature on the topic was reviewed in order to highlight the evidence that currently supports PCC use in LT patients. Results: Prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs) may offer several advantages when compared to FFP. Indeed, PCCs have been shown to reduce the risk of TACO, which during liver transplantation may deteriorate portal hypertension, increase intraoperative bleeding, and possibly reduce survival rates. One of the major concerns for PCC use is thrombogenicity. However, currently available PCCs are much safer as they contain inactivated forms of the vitamin K-dependent coagulation factors and protein C, protein S, antithrombin and/or heparin. Nowadays, the use of PCCs to correct coagulation abnormalities that occur during LT is an increasingly widespread practice. However, it is not yet clear what level of evidence supports this practice, and what the risks associated with it are. Conclusions: Administration of PCC in LT patients to correct haemostatic abnormalities seems to be well-tolerated, but the relationship between PCC use and thromboembolic events in the postoperative period remains unclear. Adequately powered, methodologically sound trials are urgently required for more definitive conclusions about the efficacy and safety of PCCs in a broad phenotype of LT recipients.

Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a frequent and severe complication after liver transplantation (LT), occurring in 30–60% of cases. It increases mortality, prolongs hospital stay, and increases the risk of chronic kidney disease. Intraoperative, modifiable anesthetic factors play a key preventive role. This systematic review synthesizes the overall prevalence of AKI and examines the evidence linking intraoperative anesthetic management to AKI after LT, emphasizing modifiable factors that may inform future perioperative strategies. Methods: We conducted a systematic, computerized search on PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Scopus from January 2004 to November 16, 2025, following a registered protocol on PROSPERO (ID: CRD420250580749). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies assessing intraoperative predictors of AKI were considered eligible for inclusion. The primary outcome was the incidence of post-LT AKI. Intraoperative factors associated with post-LT AKI, including intraoperative hypotension, fluid therapy, transfusion strategies, and the use of vasopressors and/or inotropic agents, were also assessed. Results: A total of 50 studies (8 RCTs and 42 cohort studies) involving 22,434 patients were included. The pooled incidence of post-LT AKI from observational studies was 41% (95% CI 36–46%). Across the included studies, intraoperative hemodynamic instability, excessive or unbalanced fluid administration, liberal transfusion practices, and suboptimal use of vasopressors were consistently associated with an increased risk of post-transplant AKI. Conclusions: AKI after LT is mainly influenced by modifiable perioperative factors. Prevention relies on maintaining stable hemodynamics, careful fluid and transfusion management, and avoiding intraoperative hypotension. Prompt and adequate vasopressor support appeared protective. A multimodal, personalized, kidney-protective approach is essential for improving post-transplant outcomes.