Rafiyuddin Mathakiya

Rafiyuddin Mathakiya


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

4Years (2023-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2023 in Genes
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HJHarshrajsinh Bhupendrasinh Joddha
Harshrajsinh Bhupendrasinh Joddha
RMRafiyuddin Mathakiya
Rafiyuddin Mathakiya
KJKuldip V. Joshi
Kuldip V. Joshi
RKRavindra B. Khant
Ravindra B. Khant
AGAkash Vinubhai Golaviya
Akash Vinubhai Golaviya
Prakash KoringaPrakash Koringa
Prakash Koringa
This study is designed to investigate Escherichia coli for the antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) and integrons from healthy as well as diarrhoeic/diseased animals/birds’ faecal samples. A total of eight samples were selected for the study; from each animal, two samples were taken, one from healthy animals/birds and one from diarrhoeic/diseased animals/birds. Antibiotic sensitivity testing (AST) and whole genome sequencing (WGS) was performed for selected isolates. The E. coli isolates showed resistance to moxifloxacin, followed by erythromycin, ciprofloxacin, pefloxacin, tetracycline, levofloxacin, ampicillin, amoxicillin, and sulfadiazine (4/8, 50.00% each). The E. coli isolates were 100% sensitive to amikacin, followed by chloramphenicol, cefixime, cefoperazone, and cephalothin. A total of 47 ARGs from 12 different antibiotic classes were detected among the eight isolates by WGS. The different classes of antibiotics included aminoglycoside, sulphonamide, tetracycline, trimethoprim, quinolone, fosfomycin, phenicol, macrolide, colistin, fosmidomycin, and multidrug efflux. The class 1 integrons were detected in 6/8 (75.00%) isolates with 14 different gene cassettes.

1 January 2024 in Journal of Veterinary Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AGAkash Vinubhai Golaviya
Akash Vinubhai Golaviya
RMRafiyuddin Mathakiya
Rafiyuddin Mathakiya
SJSubhash J Jakhesara
Subhash J Jakhesara
Prakash KoringaPrakash Koringa
Prakash Koringa
Golaviya A, et al. J Vet Sci. 2024 Jul;25(4):e55. https://doi.org/10.4142/jvs.24124

20 July 2026 in Veterinary World
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FPFatimazohra Abdulrashidkhan Pathan
Fatimazohra Abdulrashidkhan Pathan
APArunkumar Chaturbhai Patel
Arunkumar Chaturbhai Patel
NRNiyati M. Rana
Niyati M. Rana
SASejal P. Antiya
Sejal P. Antiya
Prakash KoringaPrakash Koringa
Prakash Koringa
APAnkit S. Prajapati
Ankit S. Prajapati
Background and Aim: Feline parvovirus (FPV) and canine parvovirus (CPV) are highly contagious pathogens that cause severe enteritis in companion animals, leading to considerable morbidity and mortality, particularly in young and unvaccinated animals. The continuous evolution of CPV variants and increasing evidence of cross-species transmission present major challenges for disease diagnosis, surveillance, and control. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of FPV and CPV infections among cats and dogs in Gujarat, India, compare the diagnostic performance of rapid antigen testing (RAT), conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and quantitative PCR (qPCR), characterize circulating viral variants through VP2 gene sequencing and phylogenetic analysis, and investigate evidence of cross-species circulation. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted between September 2024 and September 2025 using 200 fecal samples collected from 100 cats and 100 dogs presented to veterinary clinics, shelters, and rescue organizations in Gujarat, India. Samples were examined using RAT, conventional PCR targeting the VP2 gene, and duplex probe-based qPCR to differentially detect FPV and CPV. Representative positive samples were subjected to VP2 gene sequencing, phylogenetic analysis, and virus isolation in Crandell-Rees feline kidney cell cultures to evaluate viral replication. Epidemiological characteristics, including species, age, breed, vaccination status, and clinical presentation, were also assessed. Results: RAT detected FPV and CPV in 10 (5.0%) and 80 (40.0%) samples, respectively, whereas conventional PCR identified 39 (19.5%) parvovirus-positive samples. Duplex qPCR demonstrated markedly superior sensitivity, detecting 124 (62.0%) positive samples, comprising 27 FPV and 97 CPV infections. Cross-species circulation was demonstrated by detection of CPV in 12% of cats and FPV in 1% of dogs. Sequencing of the VP2 gene revealed genetically conserved FPV isolates and predominance of CPV-2c among canine isolates, including a novel CPV-2c variant carrying unique amino acid substitutions suggestive of ongoing viral evolution. Virus isolation successfully confirmed replication in four of nine inoculated samples, producing characteristic cytopathic effects in Crandell-Rees feline kidney cells. Conclusion: FPV and CPV co-circulate among companion animals in Gujarat, with molecular evidence of cross-species transmission and predominance of CPV-2c variants. Duplex qPCR substantially outperformed RAT and conventional PCR, supporting its routine application for accurate diagnosis, epidemiological surveillance, and early detection of emerging parvovirus variants. Continuous molecular surveillance combined with sustained vaccination programs is essential to limit viral dissemination and improve control of parvoviral infections. Keywords: canine parvovirus, cross-species transmission, feline parvovirus, molecular epidemiology, phylogenetic analysis, quantitative polymerase chain reaction, VP2 gene, viral evolution.