Florentina Gherghiceanu

Florentina Gherghiceanu


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
7 April 2022 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CMCarmen Moldovan
Carmen Moldovan
Marian IonMarian Ion
Marian Ion
David Catalin DragomirDavid Catalin Dragomir
David Catalin Dragomir
SDSilviu Dinulescu
Silviu Dinulescu
CMCarmen Marinela Mihailescu
Carmen Marinela Mihailescu
AOAna Maria Oproiu
Ana Maria Oproiu
In this article, we present our research achievements regarding the development of a remote sensing system for motor pulse acquisition, as a first step towards a complete neuroprosthetic arm. We present the fabrication process of an implantable electrode for nerve impulse acquisition, together with an innovative wirelessly controlled system. In our study, these were combined into an implantable device for attachment to peripheral nerves. Mechanical and biocompatibility tests were performed, as well as in vivo testing on pigs using the developed system. This testing and the experimental results are presented in a comprehensive manner, demonstrating that the system is capable of accomplishing the requirements of its designed application. Most significantly, neural electrical signals were acquired and transmitted out of the body during animal experiments, which were conducted according to ethical regulations in the field.

9 April 2026 in Preprints.org
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
Bobirca FlorinBobirca Florin
Bobirca Florin
DDDan Dumitrescu
Dan Dumitrescu
FGFlorentina Gherghiceanu
Florentina Gherghiceanu
ABAnca Bobirca
Anca Bobirca
Octavian MihalacheOctavian Mihalache
Octavian Mihalache
TPTraian Pǎtraşcu
Traian Pǎtraşcu
Background/Objectives: The main objective of the study was to determine the frequency of patients who underwent breast conserving surgery (BCS) and those with modified radical mastectomy and to compare the clinical-paraclinical parameters between these groups. Methods: We conducted an observational, retrospective study, which included 101 patients diagnosed with breast cancer that had surgical interventions between January 2024 and April 2025. Results: The BCS category was represented by 36.6& cases, while 63.4% were in the mastectomy subgroup. Hemoglobin at the time of admission had an average of 13 g/dL, the difference between the 2 categories of patients being statistically significant. (13.7 vs 12.7, p=0.010). Conclusions: Although it has been a hotly debated topic in recent years, the choice of surgical technique for breast tumors still presents novelties and interest in surgical specialties. Selection criteria such as disease stage, histopathological subtype, and the intervention chosen by the surgeon may vary and oncological results may be comparable.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Bobirca FlorinBobirca Florin
Bobirca Florin
DDDan Dumitrescu
Dan Dumitrescu
FGFlorentina Gherghiceanu
Florentina Gherghiceanu
ABAnca Bobirca
Anca Bobirca
Octavian MihalacheOctavian Mihalache
Octavian Mihalache
TPTraian Pǎtraşcu
Traian Pǎtraşcu
Background/Objectives: The main objective of the study was to determine the frequency of patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and those with modified radical mastectomy and to compare the clinical–paraclinical parameters between these groups. Methods: We conducted an observational, retrospective study, which included 101 patients diagnosed with breast cancer that had surgical interventions between January 2024 and April 2025. Results: The BCS category was represented by 36.6% cases, while 63.4% were in the mastectomy subgroup. Hemoglobin at the time of admission had an average of 13 g/dL, the difference between the two categories of patients being statistically significant. (13.7 vs. 12.7, p = 0.010). Conclusions: Although it has been a hotly debated topic in recent years, the choice of surgical technique for breast tumors still presents novelties and remains a subject of interest within surgical specialties. Selection criteria such as disease stage, histopathological subtype, and the intervention chosen by the surgeon may vary and oncological results may be comparable.