Abagail McWilliams

Prof. Abagail McWilliams

College of Business Administration, University of Illionis Chicago, Chicago, IL 60607, USA

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

34Years (1993-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
13 October 2010 in Journal of Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Abagail McWilliamsAbagail McWilliams
Abagail McWilliams
DSDonald S. Siegel
Donald S. Siegel
The authors analyze the creation and capture of private and social value by firms that adopt corporate social responsibility (CSR) strategies. Strategic CSR is defined as any “responsible” activity that allows a firm to achieve a sustainable competitive advantage, regardless of motive. To provide a roadmap for managers to accomplish this objective, the authors integrate the resource-based theory (RBT) framework with concepts and tools from economics, such as hedonic pricing, contingent valuation, and the new literature on the economics of industrial organization, where CSR is referred to as “the private provision of public goods.” By linking CSR, RBT, economic models of private provision of public goods, and pricing models, the authors demonstrate how RBT can provide a structure for determining the strategic value of CSR. They then discuss the conditions under which CSR can contribute to sustainable competitive advantage.

31 October 2014 in Business Strategy and the Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Abagail McWilliamsAbagail McWilliams
Abagail McWilliams
APAnnaleena Parhankangas
Annaleena Parhankangas
JCJason Coupet
Jason Coupet
EWEric Welch
Eric Welch
DBDarold T. Barnum
Darold T. Barnum

1 June 2005 in Journal of Management Inquiry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ALAndy Lockett
Andy Lockett
Abagail McWilliamsAbagail McWilliams
Abagail McWilliams
This study was motivated by the admonition of Professor Hambrick, as president of the Academy of Management, that the field does not “matter” much. One reason for this may be that management scholars have not done a good job of disseminating knowledge to scholars in related fields. The article examines this proposition by assessing the citation patterns between management journals and journals in the related social sciences (citations received and citations sent). Results indicate that management continues to run a significant balance-of-trade deficit with economics, psychology, and sociology. Management exports a significant (but small) amount of knowledge only to psychology, while importing a significant amount from economics, psychology, and sociology. Results indicate that there is much work to be done to improve our management of knowledge, relative to the social sciences.

16 August 2017 in Administrative Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JCJason Coupet
Jason Coupet
Abagail McWilliamsAbagail McWilliams
Abagail McWilliams
The past few decades have been characterized by a growing body of profit-seeking public service areas with the understanding that profit-seeking organizations will deliver public services more efficiently than government can. These sectors include, but are not limited to, health care, corrections, education and garbage collection. Governments have created quasi markets to attract private providers of services in these sectors, with varying results. Organizational economics has provided the primary explanation for quasi markets, but questions about the sought-for efficiencies actually realized through these markets persist. We integrate resource dependence theory and organizational economics to provide a more comprehensive explanation of the persistence of quasi markets.


1 January 1993 in Journal of Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Abagail McWilliamsAbagail McWilliams
Abagail McWilliams
DSDennis L. Smart
Dennis L. Smart
The strategic management field has derived many of its theoretical concepts from other social science disciplines including economics, psychology, and sociology. Industrial organization (IO) economics and the structure-conduct-performance paradigm, in particular, provided many of the building blocks upon which strategy formulation was constructed (Barney, 1986; Harrigan, 1981; Porter, 1981). However, some researchers are now questioning this transfer of theory from IO economics to Strategic Management (Barney, 1986; Conner, 1991; Hirsch & Friedman, 1986; Rumelt, 1984).