Payal Khincha

Dr. Payal Khincha


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
12 November 2021 in The Lancet Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KAKelvin César de Andrade
Kelvin César de Andrade
PKPayal Khincha
Payal Khincha
JHJessica N Hatton
Jessica N Hatton
MFMegan N Frone
Megan N Frone
TWTalia Wegman-Ostrosky
Talia Wegman-Ostrosky
SSSharon A Savage
Sharon A Savage

12 March 2025 in Clinical Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MAMaria Isabel Achatz
Maria Isabel Achatz
AVAnita Villani
Anita Villani
ABAlison A. Bertuch
Alison A. Bertuch
GBGaëlle Bougeard
Gaëlle Bougeard
VCVivian Y. Chang
Vivian Y. Chang
DMDavid Malkin
David Malkin
Li–Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) is an autosomal dominant cancer predisposition condition characterized by a high lifetime risk for a wide spectrum of malignancies associated with germline pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in the TP53 tumor suppressor gene. Secondary malignant neoplasms are particularly common. Early cancer detection through surveillance enables early intervention and leads to improved clinical outcomes with reduced tumor-related mortality and treatment-related morbidity. Since the 2017 publication of LFS tumor surveillance guidelines from the inaugural American Association for Cancer Research Childhood Cancer Predisposition Workshop, understanding the genotype–phenotype relationships in LFS has evolved, and adaptations of the guidelines have been implemented in institutions worldwide. The “Toronto Protocol” remains the current standard for lifelong surveillance; however, as outlined in this perspective, modifications should be considered about the use of certain modalities to target organs in an age-dependent manner. The Working Group’s recommendations have also been extended to include a more detailed outline for surveillance in the adult TP53 pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant carrier population, based on the recognition that early education of both practitioners and patients on what to expect after the transition from childhood/adolescence to young adulthood is important in preparing them for changes in surveillance strategies. In this perspective, we provide an up-to-date clinical overview of LFS and present our updated consensus tumor surveillance recommendations from the 2023 American Association for Cancer Research Childhood Cancer Predisposition Workshop.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PKPayal Khincha
Payal Khincha
CDCasey Dagnall
Casey Dagnall
BHBelynda Hicks
Belynda Hicks
KJKristine Jones
Kristine Jones
AAAbraham Aviv
Abraham Aviv
SGShahinaz Gadalla
Shahinaz Gadalla
Several methods have been employed to measure telomere length (TL) in human studies. It has been difficult to directly compare the results from these studies because of differences in the laboratory techniques and output parameters. We compared TL measurements (TLMs) by the three most commonly used methods, quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), flow cytometry with fluorescence in situ hybridization (flow FISH) and Southern blot, in a cohort of patients with the telomere biology disorder dyskeratosis congenita (DC) and in their unaffected relatives (controls). We observed a strong correlation between the Southern blot average TL and the flow FISH total lymphocyte TL in both the DC patients and their unaffected relatives (R2 of 0.68 and 0.73, respectively). The correlation between the qPCR average TL and that of the Southern blot method was modest (R2 of 0.54 in DC patients and of 0.43 in unaffected relatives). Similar results were noted when comparing the qPCR average TL and the flow FISH total lymphocyte TL (R2 of 0.49 in DC patients and of 0.42 in unaffected relatives). In conclusion, the strengths of the correlations between the three widely used TL assays (qPCR, flow FISH, and Southern blot) were significantly different. Careful consideration is warranted when selecting the method of TL measurement for research and for clinical studies.

24 December 2018 in Genome Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JKJung Kim
Jung Kim
WLWen Luo
Wen Luo
Mingyi WangMingyi Wang
Mingyi Wang
TWTalia Wegman
Talia Wegman
MFMegan Frone
Megan Frone
DSDouglas R Stewart
Douglas R Stewart
Prior research has established that the prevalence of pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants across all of the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) Secondary Findings (SF) genes is approximately 0.8–5%. We investigated the prevalence of P/LP variants in the 24 ACMG SF v2.0 cancer genes in a family-based cancer research cohort (n = 1173) and in cancer-free ethnicity-matched controls (n = 982). We used InterVar to classify variants and subsequently conducted a manual review to further examine variants of unknown significance (VUS). In the 24 genes on the ACMG SF v2.0 list associated with a cancer phenotype, we observed 8 P/LP unique variants (8 individuals; 0.8%) in controls and 11 P/LP unique variants (14 individuals; 1.2%) in cases, a non-significant difference. We reviewed 115 VUS. The median estimated per-variant review time required was 30 min; the first variant within a gene took significantly (p = 0.0009) longer to review (median = 60 min) compared with subsequent variants (median = 30 min). The concordance rate was 83.3% for the variants examined by two reviewers. The 115 VUS required database and literature review, a time- and labor-intensive process hampered by the difficulty in interpreting conflicting P/LP determinations. By rigorously investigating the 24 ACMG SF v2.0 cancer genes, our work establishes a benchmark P/LP variant prevalence rate in a familial cancer cohort and controls.

30 July 2024 in Clinical Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LMLuke D. Maese
Luke D. Maese
MWMarcin W. Wlodarski
Marcin W. Wlodarski
SKSun Young Kim
Sun Young Kim
ABAlison A. Bertuch
Alison A. Bertuch
GBGaelle Bougeard
Gaelle Bougeard
CPChristopher C. Porter
Christopher C. Porter
Children harboring certain germline gene variants have an increased risk of developing myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and other hematopoietic malignancies (HM), such as leukemias and lymphomas. Recent studies have identified an expanding number of these predisposition genes, with variants most prevalent in children with MDS but also found in children with other HM. For some hematopoietic malignancy predispositions (HMP), specifically those with a high risk of MDS, early intervention through hematopoietic stem cell transplantation can favorably impact overall survival, providing a rationale for rigorous surveillance. A multidisciplinary panel of experts at the 2023 AACR Childhood Cancer Predisposition Workshop reviewed the latest advances in the field and updated prior 2017 surveillance recommendations for children with HMP. In addition to general guidance for all children with HMP, which includes annual physical examination, education about the signs and symptoms of HM, consultation with experienced providers, and early assessment by a hematopoietic stem cell transplantation specialist, the panel provided specific recommendations for individuals with a higher risk of MDS based on the affected gene. These recommendations include periodic and comprehensive surveillance for individuals with those syndromes associated with higher risk of MDS, including serial bone marrow examinations to monitor for morphologic changes and deep sequencing for somatic changes in genes associated with HM progression. This approach enables close monitoring of disease evolution based on the individual’s genetic profile. As more HMP-related genes are discovered and the disorders’ natural histories are better defined, these personalized recommendations will serve as a foundation for future guidelines in managing these conditions.

12 September 2024 in Clinical Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YNYoshiko Nakano
Yoshiko Nakano
Roland KuiperRoland Kuiper
Roland Kuiper
KNKim E. Nicols
Kim E. Nicols
CPChristopher C. Porter
Christopher C. Porter
HLHarry Lesmana
Harry Lesmana
MWMichael F. Walsh
Michael F. Walsh
Genomic instability disorders are characterized by DNA or chromosomal instability, resulting in various clinical manifestations, including developmental anomalies, immunodeficiency, and increased risk of developing cancers beginning in childhood. Many of these genomic instability disorders also present with exquisite sensitivity to anticancer treatments such as ionizing radiation and chemotherapy, which may further increase the risk of second cancers. In July 2023, the American Association for Cancer Research held the second Childhood Cancer Predisposition Workshop, where multidisciplinary international experts discussed, reviewed, and updated recommendations for children with cancer predisposition syndromes. This article discusses childhood cancer risks and surveillance recommendations for the group of genomic instability disorders with predominantly recessive inheritance, including the DNA repair disorders ataxia telangiectasia, Nijmegen breakage syndrome, Fanconi anemia, xeroderma pigmentosum, Bloom syndrome, and Rothmund–Thomson syndrome, as well as the telomere biology disorders and mosaic variegated aneuploidy. Recognition of children with genomic instability disorders is important in order to make the proper diagnosis, enable genetic counseling, and inform cancer screening, cancer risk reduction, and choice of anticancer therapy.