Alicia Peduzzi

Dr. Alicia Peduzzi

Warnell School of Forestry and Natural resources, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602-2152, USA

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

4Years (2023-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
6 March 2024 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KHKatrina Ariel Henn
Katrina Ariel Henn
Alicia PeduzziAlicia Peduzzi
Alicia Peduzzi
The urban heat island (UHI) effect, where urban areas experience higher temperatures than surrounding rural regions, necessitates effective monitoring to estimate and address its diverse impacts. Many existing studies on urban heat dynamics rely on satellite data with coarse resolutions, posing challenges in analyzing heterogeneous urban surfaces. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) offer a solution by providing thermal imagery at a resolution finer than 1 m. Despite UAV thermal imaging being extensively explored in agriculture, its application in urban environments, specifically for surface temperatures, remains underexplored. A pilot project conducted in Athens, Georgia, utilized a UAV with a FLIR Vue Pro R 640 thermal camera to collect thermal data from two neighborhoods. Ground data, obtained using a handheld FLIR E6-XT infrared imaging camera, were compared with UAV thermal imagery. The study aimed to assess the accuracy of the UAV camera and the handheld camera for urban monitoring. Initial testing revealed the handheld’s accuracy but tendency to underpredict, while UAV camera testing highlighted considerations for altitude in both the rjpg and tiff image pixel conversion models. Despite challenges, the study demonstrates the potential of UAV-derived thermal data for monitoring urban surface temperatures, emphasizing the need for careful model considerations in data interpretation.

25 February 2023 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AAAngel Adhikari
Angel Adhikari
CMCristian Montes
Cristian Montes
Alicia PeduzziAlicia Peduzzi
Alicia Peduzzi
Recent advancements in laser scanning technology have demonstrated great potential for the precise characterization of forests. However, a major challenge in utilizing metrics derived from lidar data for the forest attribute prediction is the high degree of correlation between these metrics, leading to multicollinearity issues when developing multivariate linear regression models. To address this challenge, this study compared the performance of four different modeling methods for predicting various forest attributes using aerial lidar data: (1) Least Squares Regression (LSR), (2) Adaptive Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (ALASSO), (3) Random Forest (RF), and (4) Generalized Additive Modeling Selection (GAMSEL). The study used three primary plot-level forest attributes (volume, basal area, and dominant height) as response variables and thirty-nine plot-level lidar metrics as explanatory variables. A k-fold cross-validation approach was used, with consistent folds to assess the performance of each method. Our results revealed that no single method demonstrated a significant advantage over the others. Nonetheless, the highest R2 values of 0.88, 0.83, and 0.87 for volume, basal area, and dominant height, respectively, were achieved using the ALASSO method. This method was also found to be less biased, followed by GAMSEL and LSR.

22 May 2023 in Forests
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KHKatrina Ariel Henn
Katrina Ariel Henn
Alicia PeduzziAlicia Peduzzi
Alicia Peduzzi
The benefits and services of urban forests are becoming increasingly well documented, with carbon storage being the main focus of attention. Recent efforts in urban remote sensing have incorporated additional data such as LiDAR data but have been limited to sections of an urban area or only certain species. Existing models are not generalizable to remaining unmeasured urban trees. To make a generalizable individual urban tree model, we used metrics from NAIP aerial imagery and NOAA and USGS LiDAR data for 2013 and 2019, and two crown-level urban tree biomass models were developed. We ran a LASSO regression, which selected the best variables for the biomass model, followed by a 10-fold cross-validation. The 2013 model had an adjusted R2 value of 0.85 and an RMSE of 1797 kg, whereas the 2019 model had an adjusted R2 value of 0.87 and an RMSE of 1444 kg. The 2019 model was then applied to the rest of the unsampled trees to estimate the total biomass and total carbon stored for all the trees in the county. Recommendations include changes to ground inventory techniques to adapt to the current methods and limitations of remote sensing biomass estimation.

10 August 2024 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TLTaeyoon Lee
Taeyoon Lee
Can VatandaslarCan Vatandaslar
Can Vatandaslar
KMKrista Merry
Krista Merry
Pete BettingerPete Bettinger
Pete Bettinger
Alicia PeduzziAlicia Peduzzi
Alicia Peduzzi
JSJonathan M. Stober
Jonathan M. Stober
Accurately assessing forest structure and maintaining up-to-date information about forest structure is crucial for various forest planning efforts, including the development of reliable forest plans and assessments of the sustainable management of natural resources. Field measurements traditionally applied to acquire forest inventory information (e.g., basal area, tree volume, and aboveground biomass) are labor intensive and time consuming. To address this limitation, remote sensing technology has been widely applied in modeling efforts to help estimate forest inventory information. Among various remotely sensed data, LiDAR can potentially help describe forest structure. This study was conducted to estimate and map forest inventory information across the Shoal Creek and Talladega Ranger Districts of the Talladega National Forest by employing ALS-derived data and aerial photography. The quality of the predictive models was evaluated to determine whether additional remotely sensed data can help improve forest structure estimates. Additionally, the quality of general predictive models was compared to that of species group models. This study confirms that quality level 2 LiDAR data were sufficient for developing adequate predictive models (R2adj. ranging between 0.71 and 0.82), when compared to the predictive models based on LiDAR and aerial imagery. Additionally, this study suggests that species group predictive models were of higher quality than general predictive models. Lastly, landscape level maps were created from the predictive models and these may be helpful to planners, forest managers, and landowners in their management efforts.

7 June 2024 in Preprints.org
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
TLTaeyoon Lee
Taeyoon Lee
Can VatandaslarCan Vatandaslar
Can Vatandaslar
KMKrista Merry
Krista Merry
Pete BettingerPete Bettinger
Pete Bettinger
Alicia PeduzziAlicia Peduzzi
Alicia Peduzzi
JSJonathan M. Stober
Jonathan M. Stober
Accurately assessing forest structure and maintaining up-to-date information about forest structure is crucial for various forest planning efforts, including the development of reliable forest plans and assessments of the sustainable management of natural resources. Field measurements traditionally applied to acquire forest inventory information (e.g., basal area, tree volume, and aboveground biomass) are labor-intensive and time-consuming. To address this limitation, remote sensing tech-nology has been widely applied in modeling efforts to help estimate forest inventory information. Among various remotely sensed data, LiDAR can potentially help describe forest structure. This study was conducted to estimate and map forest inventory information across the Talladega Na-tional Forest by employing ALS-derived data and aerial photography. The quality of predictive models was evaluated to determine whether additional remotely sensed data can help improve forest structure estimates. Additionally, the quality of general predictive models was compared to that of species-group models. This study confirms that quality level 2 LiDAR data was sufficient for developing adequate predictive models (R2adj. ranging between 0.71 and 0.82) when compared to the predictive models based on LiDAR and aerial imagery. Additionally, this study suggests that species-group predictive models were of higher quality than general predictive models. Lastly, landscape-level maps were created from the predictive models, and these may be helpful to plan-ners, forest managers, and landowners in their management efforts.