Objective: This study aimed to explore the effect of different administration routes of a low dose of tirofiban on acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with successful recanalization after endovascular treatment (EVT).Methods: This is a cohort study that retrospectively analyzed data of patients with AIS who underwent EVT and achieved successful recanalization from a prospective registry. Eligible patients were divided into three groups according to their use of tirofiban. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance baseline bias. Safety outcomes included any intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and symptomatic ICH (sICH). Efficacy outcomes included arterial reocclusion, in‐hospital mortality, 3‐month mortality, and 3‐month functional outcomes.Results: We included 821 patients with 306 in the no tirofiban group, 202 in the IA + IV tirofiban group, and 313 in the IV tirofiban group. After PSM, each group included 101 patients with balanced baseline characteristics. There was no difference between the IV tirofiban group and the no tirofiban group in terms of safety and efficacy outcomes (all p > 0.05). Compared with no tirofiban, IA + IV tirofiban group did not increase ICH (30.7% vs. 37.6%, p > 0.05) and sICH (6.9% vs. 17.8%, p > 0.05) whereas reduced 3‐month mortality (14.3% vs. 28.7%, p < 0.05) and improved 3‐month modified Rankin Scale (median 3 vs. 4, p < 0.05).Conclusions: A low dose of tirofiban, regardless of their administration routes, was safe for AIS patients who achieved successful recanalization with EVT, whereas only IA + IV tirofiban improved clinical outcomes.

Background: Exploratory studies have shown that remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) has the potential to lower blood pressure (BP). We investigated whether chronic RIC reduces BP for hypertension. Methods: This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-controlled trial. Patients with an office BP of 130/80 to 160/100 mm Hg and a 24-hour average BP ≥125/75 mm Hg not on antihypertensive medications were recruited. After a 1-week compliance screening phase, they were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive RIC or sham RIC twice daily for 4 weeks. The primary efficacy outcome was the change in 24-hour average systolic BP from baseline to 4 weeks. Safety events were assessed over the study period. Results: Ninety-five participants were randomly allocated to the RIC (n=49) and sham RIC (n=46) groups. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the reduction in 24-hour average systolic BP was greater in the RIC group than the sham RIC group (−4.6±9.5 versus −0.9±6.8 mm Hg; baseline-adjusted between-group mean difference: −3.6 mm Hg [95% CI, −6.9 to −0.3 mm Hg]; adjusted P =0.035). The per-protocol analysis showed that 24-hour average systolic BP reduced −5.9±8.6 mm Hg in the RIC group and −0.7±6.7 mm Hg in the sham RIC group (baseline-adjusted between-group mean difference: −5.2 mm Hg [95% CI, −8.5 to −1.9 mm Hg]; adjusted P =0.002). No major adverse events were reported in both groups. Conclusions: RIC is safe in patients with mild hypertension and may lower BP in the absence of antihypertensive medications. However, the effects of RIC on clinical outcomes in these patients require further investigation. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT04915313.

Aims: With the progress of thrombectomy technology, the vascular recanalization rate of patients with stroke has been continuously improved, but the proportion of futile recanalization (FR) is still quite a few. The long‐term prognosis and survival of patients with FR and its influencing factors remain unclear.Methods: Consecutive patients who received endovascular treatment (EVT) for ischemic stroke were enrolled between 2013 and 2021 from a single‐center prospectively registry study. We evaluated the long‐term outcome of these patients by Kaplan–Meier survival analysis, and the multivariable logistic regression curve was performed to analyze influencing factors.Results: Among 458 patients with FR, 56.4% of patients survived at 1 year, and 50.4% at 2 years. In the multivariate regression analysis, age, premorbid modified Rankin Scale (mRS), National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), posterior circulation infarct, general anesthesia, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), and decompressive craniectomy were found to be related to unfavorable outcomes in long‐term. Age, premorbid mRS, NIHSS, general anesthesia, and sICH were predictors of long‐term mortality.Conclusions: Futile recanalization accounts for a large proportion of stroke patients after thrombectomy. This study on the long‐term prognosis of such patients is beneficial to the formulation of treatment plans and the prediction of therapeutic effects.

Background: Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) has shown an impressive neuroprotective effect on acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in animal experiments. But whether chronic RIC improves long-term functional outcomes remains unclear. Materials and Methods: We performed a non-randomized controlled trial. Eligible patients (aged 18 –80 y) with hemiplegia caused by AIS were allocated to the RIC group and the control group. All participants received normal protocol rehabilitation therapy. Patients in the RIC group underwent RIC twice daily for 90 days. The outcome included the 90-day Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) scores and modified Rankin’s scale (mRS) scores, as well as changes in angiogenesis-related factors in serum from baseline to 90 days. Results: Twenty-seven patients were included in the analysis (13 in the RIC group and 14 in the control group). There was no significant difference in 90-day total FMA scores between the two groups. Lower limb FMA scores at day 90 were significantly higher in the RIC group (32.8±8.7 vs. 24.8±5.4, adjusted P=0.042). The proportion of favorable outcome (mRS<2) was higher in the RIC group than that in the control group, but no significant difference was detected (8 [61.5%] vs. 7 [50%], P=0.705). A significant increase has been found in the level of epidermal growth factor (EGF) in serum (9.4 [1.1 to 25.7] vs. −8.7 [−15.1 to 4.7], P=0.036) after chronic RIC procedure. Conclusion: This study investigated the role that RIC plays in AIS recovery, especially in motor function. RIC may have beneficial effects on lower limbs recovery by enhancing the EGF level. The effect of RIC on motor recovery should be further validated in future studies.