Giovanna Magagnoli

Dr. Giovanna Magagnoli

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
25 May 2021 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FAFrancesca Ambrosi
Francesca Ambrosi
ARAlberto Righi
Alberto Righi
SBStefania Benini
Stefania Benini
GMGiovanna Magagnoli
Giovanna Magagnoli
ICIlaria Chiaramonte
Ilaria Chiaramonte
MGMarco Gambarotti
Marco Gambarotti
Background: Giant cell tumor of bone is a locally aggressive, rarely metastasizing tumor that accounts for about 5% of bone tumors and generally occurs in patients between 20 and 45 years old. A driver mutation in the histone 3.3 (H3.3) gene H3F3A has been identified in as many as 96% of giant cell tumors of bone. The immunohistochemical expression of H3F3A H3.3 G34 expression was found in 97.8% of cases. In the present study, we describe our series of cases of giant cell tumor of bone in pediatric patients <16 years old. Methods: All cases of giant cell tumor of bone in pediatric patients <16 years old treated in our institute between 1982 and 2018 were reviewed. Immunohistochemistry and/or molecular analysis for H3F3A gene mutations was performed to confirm the diagnosis. A group of aneurysmal bone cysts in patients <16 years old was used as a control group. Results: Fifteen cases were retrieved. A pronounced female predominance (93%) was observed. A pure metaphyseal central location occurs in 2 skeletally immature patients. Conclusions: Giant cell tumor of bone should be distinguished from its mimickers due to differences in prognosis and treatment. Immunohistochemical and molecular detection of H3F3A gene mutation represents a reliable diagnostic tool.

1 July 2021 in European Journal of Surgical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ARAlberto Righi
Alberto Righi
MPMarina Pacheco
Marina Pacheco
Emanuela PalmeriniEmanuela Palmerini
Emanuela Palmerini
ECElisa Carretta
Elisa Carretta
MGMarco Gambarotti
Marco Gambarotti
ATAngelo Paolo Dei Tos
Angelo Paolo Dei Tos

1 January 2018 in Pathology - Research and Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GGGabriella Gamberi
Gabriella Gamberi
LMLuca Morandi
Luca Morandi
SBStefania Benini
Stefania Benini
ARAnna Resca
Anna Resca
SCStefania Cocchi
Stefania Cocchi
MGMarco Gambarotti
Marco Gambarotti

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SBStefania Benini
Stefania Benini
GGGabriella Gamberi
Gabriella Gamberi
SCStefania Cocchi
Stefania Cocchi
GMGiovanna Magagnoli
Giovanna Magagnoli
AFAngela Rosa Fortunato
Angela Rosa Fortunato
MGMarco Gambarotti
Marco Gambarotti
The histological diagnosis of sarcoma can be difficult as it sometimes requires the combination of morphological and immunophenotypic analyses with molecular tests. A total of 2705 tissue samples of sarcoma consecutively collected from 2006 until 2020 that had undergone molecular analysis were assessed to evaluate their diagnostic utility compared with histological assessments. A total of 3051 molecular analyses were performed, including 1484 gene fusions tested by c/qRT–PCR, 992 gene rearrangements analysed by FISH, 433 analyses of the gene status of MDM2, 126 mutational analyses and 16 NGS analysis. Of the samples analysed, 68% were from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue and 32% were from frozen tissue. C/qRT–PCR and FISH analyses were conclusive on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue in 74% and 76% of samples, respectively, but the combination of the two methods gave us conclusive results in 96% and 89% of frozen and formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues, respectively. We demonstrate the utility of c/qRT–PCR and FISH for sarcoma diagnosis and that each has advantages in specific contexts. We conclude that it is possible to accurately predict the sarcoma subtype using a panel of different subtype-specific FISH probes and c/qRT–PCR assays, thereby greatly facilitating the differential diagnosis of these tumours.

9 August 2024 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MMMargherita Maioli
Margherita Maioli
SCStefania Cocchi
Stefania Cocchi
MGMarco Gambarotti
Marco Gambarotti
SBStefania Benini
Stefania Benini
GMGiovanna Magagnoli
Giovanna Magagnoli
ARAlberto Righi
Alberto Righi
The partial loss of SMARCB1/INI1 expression has recently been reported in skull base conventional chordomas, with possible therapeutic implications. We retrospectively analyzed 89 patients with conventional spinal chordomas to investigate the differences in the immunohistochemical expression of SMARCB1/INI1 and the underlying genetic alterations in the SMARCB1 gene. Moreover, we assessed the correlation of clinicopathological features (age, gender, tumor size, tumor location, surgical margins, Ki67 labelling index, SMARCB1/INI1 pattern, previous surgery, previous treatment, type of surgery, and the Charlson Comorbidity Index) with patient survival. Our cohort included 51 males and 38 females, with a median age at diagnosis of 61 years. The median tumor size at presentation was 5.9 cm. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 90.8% and 54.9%, respectively. Partial SMARCB1/INI1 loss was identified in 37 (41.6%) patients with conventional spinal chordomas (27 mosaic and 10 clonal). The most frequent genetic alteration detected was the monoallelic deletion of a portion of the long arm of chromosome 22, which includes the SMARCB1 gene. Partial loss of SMARCB1/INI1 was correlated with cervical–thoracic–lumbar tumor location (p = 0.033) and inadequate surgical margins (p = 0.007), possibly due to the high degree of tumor invasiveness in this site. Among all the considered clinicopathological features related to patient survival, only tumor location in the sacrococcygeal region and adequate surgical margins positively impacted DFS. In conclusion, partial SMARCB1/INI1 loss, mostly due to 22q deletion, was detected in a significant number of patients with conventional spinal chordomas and was correlated with mobile spine location and inadequate surgical margins.

15 February 2022 in Human Pathology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MGMarco Gambarotti
Marco Gambarotti
ARAlberto Righi
Alberto Righi
MSMarta Sbaraglia
Marta Sbaraglia
SCStefania Cocchi
Stefania Cocchi
SBStefania Benini
Stefania Benini
ATAngelo Paolo Dei Tos
Angelo Paolo Dei Tos