To our knowledge it is unknown whether concomitant inguinal lymph node dissection at the time of penectomy improves outcomes in patients with penile cancer. We analyzed predictors of regional recurrence as well as disease specific survival based on time of inguinal lymph node dissection. We also determined an optimal time to perform inguinal lymph node dissection. We reviewed the records of 84 consecutive patients with available nodal pathology findings. Recurrence-free and disease specific survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Optimal time to inguinal lymph node dissection was assessed by ROC curves and used for dichotomization. Cox proportional HRs were used to identify predictors of regional recurrence after inguinal lymph node dissection. A total of 47 (56%) and 37 patients (44%) presented with cN0 and cN+ disease, respectively, during a median followup of 21 months. A cutoff point of 3 months to perform inguinal lymph node dissection was used to dichotomize the cohort into early vs delayed groups. Early dissection in 51 men demonstrated 5-year recurrence-free survival of 77% vs 37.8% in 33 who underwent delayed dissection. Positive node disease (HR 23.2, 95% CI 2.98-181.2) and early inguinal lymph node dissection (HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.21-0.98) were predictors of regional recurrence. Five-year disease specific survival was 64.1% and 39.5% in the early and late dissection groups, respectively. Three months appears to be an optimal window for performing inguinal lymph node dissection. While prospective trials are needed to define the role of upfront groin dissection, our results may help delineate patterns of referral and timing of inguinal lymph node dissection in patients with penile cancer.

Background: Racial/ethnic minority groups have a higher burden of renal cell carcinoma (RCC), but RCC among Hispanic Americans (HAs) and American Indians and Alaska Natives (AIs/ANs) are clinically not well characterized. We explored variations in age at diagnosis and frequencies of RCC histologic subtypes across racial/ethnic groups and Hispanic subgroups using National Cancer Database (NCDB) and Arizona Cancer Registry Data.Methods: Adult RCC cases with known race/ethnicity were included. Logistic regression analysis was performed to estimate odds and 95% confidence interval (CI) of early‐onset (age at diagnosis <50 years) and diagnosis with clear cell RCC (ccRCC) or papillary RCC.Results: A total of 405 073 RCC cases from NCDB and 9751 cases from ACR were identified and included. In both datasets, patients from racial/ethnic minority groups had a younger age at diagnosis than non‐Hispanic White (NHW) patients. In the NCDB, AIs/ANs had twofold increased odds (OR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.88‐2.59) of early‐onset RCC compared with NHWs. HAs also had twofold increased odds of early‐onset RCC (OR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.79‐2.55) in the ACR. In NCDB, ccRCC was more prevalent in AIs (86.3%) and Mexican Americans (83.5%) than NHWs (72.5%). AIs/ANs had twofold increased odds of diagnosis with ccRCC (OR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.85‐2.58) in the NCDB, but the association was stronger in the ACR (OR, 2.83; 95% CI, 2.08‐3.85). Similarly, Mexican Americans had significantly increased odds of diagnosis with ccRCC (OR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.78‐2.23) in the NCDB.Conclusions: This study reports younger age at diagnosis and higher frequencies of ccRCC histologic subtype in AIs/ANs and Hispanic subgroups. These variations across racial/ethnic groups and Hispanic subgroups may have potential clinical implications.