Community pharmacists play a vital role in the healthcare system, serving as accessible healthcare providers and entrepreneurs. To effectively manage community pharmacies, pharmacists must possess financial literacy and utilize appropriate financial indicators. However, studies addressing community pharmacists' awareness of financial indicator concepts are scarce. This study assesses the awareness of community pharmacists in Jordan regarding financial indicators. Employing a cross-sectional study design, we utilized a structured and validated questionnaire to collect data from 353 community pharmacy owners across Jordan. The questionnaire assessed pharmacists' awareness and utilization of financial indicators in pharmacy management. Descriptive statistics summarized demographic data, while analytical statistics examined associations between demographic factors and financial indicator awareness. The study revealed varying levels of awareness among pharmacists regarding financial indicators, with younger pharmacists exhibiting higher awareness levels. Factors such as educational background and years of experience were found to influence awareness. Furthermore, pharmacists predominantly utilize profitability indicators to assess financial performance. The findings underscore the importance of enhancing pharmacists' financial literacy and integrating financial management principles into pharmacy education. Continuous professional development programs are essential to improve financial competence among pharmacists. This study provides valuable insights into the awareness of financial indicators among community pharmacists in Jordan, emphasizing the need for collaborative efforts from policymakers, pharmacy faculties, and associations to enhance financial education and promote research in this critical area.

The two main classifications of antidepressant medications are selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). Out of the available choices, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) have emerged as the most commonly prescribed option. The class demonstrates a greater degree of diversity in its structural characteristics in contrast to its neurochemical effects. Nevertheless, it is important to acknowledge that the chemical composition of a drug within this specific class does not carry substantial significance in the selection process. A comprehensive analysis of the pharmacodynamic and pharmacodynamic properties of antidepressant drugs proves advantageous for clinicians and managed care providers responsible for selecting preferred selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) from a roster of authorized medications. The physicochemical characteristics, which possess considerable significance, are frequently disregarded except during the drug development stage. Pharmacodynamic properties refer to the physiological and biochemical effects that drugs exert on the human body. It is noteworthy that the inclusion of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin–norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) in a comprehensive depression management protocol may demonstrate enhanced effectiveness in clinical environments as opposed to controlled trials.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are the most commonly prescribed anti-inflammatory drugs worldwide. The most common side effects are gastrointestinal. Pantoprazole, a proton pump inhibitor (PPI), can be used to prevent these events from occurring. In this study, we attempt to develop and validate a novel method for determining and validating the fixed-dose combination of meloxicam and pantoprazole. A new method has been developed and validated to estimate pantoprazole and meloxicam in a fixed-dose combination using RP-HPLC. In order to separate the drugs, a mobile phase phosphate buffer/acetate was used (30:70, v/v), with a pH of 3.4 and a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min at 25 °C. The detection wavelength for the drugs was at a wavelength of 310 nm. The retention times for meloxicam and pantoprazole were 6 and 9 min, respectively. In concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 200 mg/L, the linearity of the detector was established. The r was 0.9998 for both drugs. Recovery rates ranged from 98 to 102% on average. According to the guidelines of the International Council on Harmonization, the results were satisfactory. Using the method presented herein, the pharmaceutical formulation of the combined meloxicam and pantoprazole can be routinely tested.

The current study is a randomized, open-label, two-period, two-sequence, two-way crossover pharmacokinetic study in healthy Jordanian subjects to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence profile of two cases of empagliflozin 10 mg under fasting and fed conditions. The plasma concentrations of empagliflozin were determined using an HPLC-MS/MS method. Tolerability and safety were assessed throughout the study. This study included 26 subjects, 26 in both fasting and fed groups.The pharmacokinetic parameters, which included the area under the concentration–time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC_0–inf) and the final quantifiable concentration (AUC_0–last), maximum serum concentration (C_max), and time to reach the maximum drug concentration (T_max) were found to be within an equivalence margin of 80.00–125.00%. The pharmacokinetic profiles show that the empagliflozin test and parent reference cases were bioequivalent in healthy subjects. The two treatments’ safety evaluations were also comparable.

A novel, sensitive, and low-cost HPLC method for the rapid determination of favipiravir (FVR) in rat plasma was developed and validated, and the effect of vitamin C on FVR pharmacokinetic parameters was investigated. FVR and oxcarbazepine (IS) were separated using a mobile phase of 50% acetonitrile and 50% water (with 0.25% trifluoroacetic acid) at 1.0 mL/min flow rate and detected at λmax 289 nm. The intra- and interday values for FVR in plasma were less than 15%, with low, medium, and high QC levels for the relative recovery rate, according to ICH guidelines. Cmax values in the control and experimental groups were 558 ± 124.42 and 979.13 ± 138.10 ng/mL, respectively; t_1/2 values were 7.15 ± 1.60 and 9.09 ± 1.14 h, AUC_(0-t) values were 5697.70 ± 536.58 and 7381.62 ± 1577.58 ng.h/mL, and AUC_(0-∞) values were 5697.70 ± 536.58 and 8192.36 ± 1721.67, respectively. According to the results, the experimental group’s Cmax of FVR was 75.17% higher than the control group’s, the Vz/F was lower, and the t_1/2 was 1.86 h longer. The technique developed for determining FVR in plasma was useful for FVR pharmacokinetics and food–drug interaction investigations.