Allison Snow

Dr. Allison Snow

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

31Years (1996-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2003 in Ecological Applications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ASAllison Snow
Allison Snow
DPD. Pilson
D. Pilson
LRLoren H. Rieseberg
Loren H. Rieseberg
MPM. J. Paulsen
M. J. Paulsen
NPN. Pleskac
N. Pleskac
SSS. M. Selbo
S. M. Selbo
Gene flow from transgenic crops can introduce novel traits into related species, but the ecological importance of this process is unknown. Here, we report the first empirical evidence that wild plants can benefit from a bacterial transgene under uncaged, natural conditions. Cultivated sunflower (Helianthus annuus) is known to hybridize frequently with wild sunflower (H. annuus) in the western and midwestern United States. We studied a crop‐developed Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) transgene, cry1Ac, in backcrossed wild sunflower populations. Lepidopteran damage on transgenic plants was strongly reduced relative to control plants at our two study sites, while damage by several weevil and fly species was unaffected. Our results suggest that reduced herbivory caused transgenic plants to produce an average of 55% more seeds per plant relative to nontransgenic controls at the field site in Nebraska. A similar but nonsignificant trend was seen at the site in Colorado (14% more seeds per plant). In a greenhouse experiment the transgene had no effect on fecundity, suggesting that it was not associated with a fitness cost. If Bt sunflowers are released commercially, we expect that Bt genes will spread to wild and weedy populations, limit damage from susceptible herbivores on these plants, and increase seed production when these herbivores are common. Corresponding Editor: C. R. Linder.

1 June 2002 in Nature Biotechnology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ASAllison Snow
Allison Snow

1 June 1998 in American Journal of Botany
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ASAllison Snow
Allison Snow
PMPedro Moran‐Palma
Pedro Moran‐Palma
LRLoren H. Rieseberg
Loren H. Rieseberg
AWAnnette Wszelaki
Annette Wszelaki
GSGerald J. Seiler
Gerald J. Seiler
Crop‐to‐wild hybridization has the potential to introduce beneficial traits into wild populations. Gene flow from genetically engineered crops, in particular, can transfer genes coding for traits such as resistance to herbicides, insect herbivores, disease, and environmental stress into wild plants. Cultivated sunflower (Helianthus annuus) hybridizes spontaneously with wild/weedy populations (also H. annuus), but little is known about the relative fitness of F1 hybrids. In order to assess the ease with which crop‐to‐wild introgression can proceed, we compared characteristics of F1 wild–crop progeny with those of purely wild genotypes. Two nontransgenic, cultivated varieties were crossed with wild plants from three different regions—Texas, Kansas, and North Dakota. Seed burial experiments in the region of origin showed that wild–crop seeds had somewhat higher germination rates (less dormancy) than wild seeds from Kansas and North Dakota, while no differences were seen in seeds from Texas. Progeny from each type of cross were grown in outdoor pots in Ohio and in a weedy field in Kansas to quantify lifetime fecundity and flowering phenology. Flowering periods of hybrid and wild progeny overlapped considerably, especially in plants from North Dakota and Texas, suggesting that these hybrids are very likely to backcross with wild plants. In general, hybrid plants had fewer branches, flower heads, and seeds than wild plants, but in two crosses the fecundity of hybrids was not significantly different from that of purely wild plants. In Ohio, wild–crop hybrids from North Dakota appeared to be resistant to a rust that infected 53 % of the purely wild progeny, indicating a possible benefit of “traditional” crop genes. In summary, our results suggest that F1 wild–crop hybrids had lower fitness than wild genotypes, especially when grown under favorable conditions, but the F1 barrier to the introgression of crop genes is quite permeable.

10 August 2005 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SOS. Ortiz-García
S. Ortiz-García
EEE. Ezcurra
E. Ezcurra
BSB. Schoel
B. Schoel
FAF. Acevedo
F. Acevedo
JSJ. Soberón
J. Soberón
ASAllison Snow
Allison Snow
In 2000, transgenes were detected in local maize varieties (landraces) in the mountains of Oaxaca, Mexico [Quist, D. & Chapela, I. H. (2001) Nature 414, 541–543]. This region is part of the Mesoamerican center of origin for maize ( Zea mays L.), and the genetic diversity that is maintained in open-pollinated landraces is recognized as an important genetic resource of great cultural value. The presence of transgenes in landraces was significant because transgenic maize has never been approved for cultivation in Mexico. Here we provide a systematic survey of the frequency of transgenes in currently grown landraces. We sampled maize seeds from 870 plants in 125 fields and 18 localities in the state of Oaxaca during 2003 and 2004. We then screened 153,746 sampled seeds for the presence of two transgene elements from the 35S promoter of the cauliflower mosaic virus and the nopaline synthase gene (nopaline synthase terminator) from Agrobacterium tumefaciens . One or both of these transgene elements are present in all transgenic commercial varieties of maize. No transgenic sequences were detected with highly sensitive PCR-based markers, appropriate positive and negative controls, and duplicate samples for DNA extraction. We conclude that transgenic maize seeds were absent or extremely rare in the sampled fields. This study provides a much-needed preliminary baseline for understanding the biological, socioeconomic, and ethical implications of the inadvertent dispersal of transgenes from the United States and elsewhere to local landraces of maize in Mexico.

28 January 2010 in New Phytologist
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ASAllison Snow
Allison Snow
TCT. M. Culley
T. M. Culley
LCL. G. Campbell
L. G. Campbell
PSP. M. Sweeney
P. M. Sweeney
SHS. G. Hegde
S. G. Hegde
NEN. C. Ellstrand
N. C. Ellstrand

1 October 1996 in Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ASAllison Snow
Allison Snow
TSTimothy P. Spira
Timothy P. Spira