Fernando Salvador Moreno

Fernando Salvador Moreno


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

48Years (1979-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
6 December 2005 in Carcinogenesis
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Thomas Prates OngThomas Prates Ong
Thomas Prates Ong
Renato HeidorRenato Heidor
Renato Heidor
ACAline de Conti
Aline de Conti
MDMaria Dagli
Maria Dagli
FMFernando Salvador Moreno
Fernando Salvador Moreno
Chemopreventive activities of farnesol (FOH) and geraniol (GOH) were evaluated during the initial phases of hepatocarcinogenesis. Rats received during eight consecutive weeks 25 mg/100 g body weight FOH (FOH group) or GOH (GOH group), or only corn oil (CO group, controls). Incidence (%) and mean number of visible hepatocyte nodules/animal were inhibited in FOH group (13% and 4 ± 1; P < 0.05), but not in GOH group (42% and 18 ± 17, P > 0.05), compared to CO group (100% and 42 ± 17). Mean area (mm 2 ) and % liver section area occupied by total hepatic placental glutathione S -transferase positive preneoplastic lesions (PNLs) were reduced in FOH group (0.09 ± 0.06; 2.8 ± 1.3; P < 0.05) compared to CO group (0.18 ± 0.12; 10.0 ± 2.8), while in GOH group only the mean area of these PNL was reduced (0.11 ± 0.09; P < 0.05), but not the % liver section area occupied by them (5.1 ± 1.1; P > 0.05). Compared to CO group, FOH and GOH groups showed reduced ( P < 0.05) PNL cell proliferation and DNA damage, but only GOH group showed increased PNL apoptosis ( P < 0.05). FOH group, but not GOH group, presented reduced ( P < 0.05) total plasma cholesterol levels and increased ( P < 0.05) hepatic levels of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMGCoA) reductase mRNA, compared to CO group. No differences ( P > 0.05) were observed between CO, FOH and GOH regarding hepatic levels of farnesoid X activated receptor (FXR) protein. Results indicate that FOH and GOH could represent promising chemopreventive agents against hepatocarcinogenesis. Inhibition of cell proliferation and DNA damage relate to both isoprenoids' anticarcinogenic actions while induction of apoptosis specifically relates to GOH protective actions. Inhibition of HMGCoA reductase activity could be associated with FOH, but not GOH anticarcinogenic actions. FXR does not seem to be involved in the isoprenoids' chemopreventive activities.

1 January 2011 in Lifestyle Genomics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Thomas Prates OngThomas Prates Ong
Thomas Prates Ong
FMFernando Salvador Moreno
Fernando Salvador Moreno
SRSharon Ann Ross
Sharon Ann Ross
Epigenetic processes participate in cancer development and likely influence cancer prevention. Global DNA hypomethylation, gene promoter hypermethylation and aberrant histone post-translational modifications are hallmarks of neoplastic cells which have been associated with genomic instability and altered gene expression. Because epigenetic deregulation occurs early in carcinogenesis and is potentially reversible, intervention strategies targeting the epigenome have been proposed for cancer prevention. Bioactive food components (BFCs) with anticancer potential, including folate, polyphenols, selenium, retinoids, fatty acids, isothiocyanates and allyl compounds, influence DNA methylation and histone modification processes. Such activities have been shown to affect the expression of genes involved in cell proliferation, death and differentiation that are frequently altered in cancer. Although the epigenome represents a promising target for cancer prevention with BFCs, few studies have addressed the influence of dietary components on these mechanisms in vivo, particularly on the phenotype of humans, and thus the exact mechanisms whereby diet mediates an effect on cancer prevention remains unclear. Primary factors that should be elucidated include the effective doses and dose timing of BFCs to attain epigenetic effects. Because diet-epigenome interactions are likely to occur in utero, the impact of early-life nutrition on cancer risk programming should be further investigated.

1 October 2014 in Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JMJuliana Xavier de Miranda
Juliana Xavier de Miranda
FAFábia de Oliveira Andrade
Fábia de Oliveira Andrade
ACAline de Conti
Aline de Conti
MDMaria Dagli
Maria Dagli
FMFernando Salvador Moreno
Fernando Salvador Moreno
Thomas Prates OngThomas Prates Ong
Thomas Prates Ong

1 September 2011 in Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CCCristiane Cominetti
Cristiane Cominetti
MBMaritsa Carla de Bortoli
Maritsa Carla de Bortoli
EPEduardo Purgatto
Eduardo Purgatto
Thomas Prates OngThomas Prates Ong
Thomas Prates Ong
FMFernando Salvador Moreno
Fernando Salvador Moreno
SCSilvia Maria Franciscato Cozzolino
Silvia Maria Franciscato Cozzolino

31 December 2012 in Current Drug Targets
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Renato HeidorRenato Heidor
Renato Heidor
JOJuliana Festa Ortega
Juliana Festa Ortega
ACAline de Conti
Aline de Conti
Thomas Prates OngThomas Prates Ong
Thomas Prates Ong
FMFernando Salvador Moreno
Fernando Salvador Moreno
Bioactive food compounds (BFCs) exhibit potential anticarcinogenic effects that deserve to be explored. Butyric acid (BA) is considered a promising BFC and has been used in clinical trials; however, its short half-life considerably restricts its therapeutic application. Tributyrin (TB), a BA prodrug present in milk fat and honey, has more favorable pharmacokinetic properties than BA, and its oral administration is also better tolerated. In vitro and in vivo studies have shown that TB acts on multiple anticancer cellular and molecular targets without affecting non-cancerous cells. Among the TB mechanisms of action, the induction of apoptosis and cell differentiation and the modulation of epigenetic mechanisms are notable. Due to its anticarcinogenic potential, strategies as lipid emulsions, nanoparticles, or structured lipids containing TB are currently being developed to improve its organoleptic characteristics and bioavailability. In addition, TB has minimal toxicity, making it an excellent candidate for combination therapy with other agents for the control of cancer. Despite the lack of data available in the literature, TB is a promising molecule for anticancer strategies. Therefore, additional preclinical and clinical studies should be performed using TB to elucidate its molecular targets and anticarcinogenic potential.

1 February 2011 in The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MCMônica Testoni Cardozo
Mônica Testoni Cardozo
ACAline de Conti
Aline de Conti
Thomas Prates OngThomas Prates Ong
Thomas Prates Ong
CSClarissa Scolastici
Clarissa Scolastici
EPEduardo Purgatto
Eduardo Purgatto
FMFernando Salvador Moreno
Fernando Salvador Moreno