Alberto Mendikute

Dr. Alberto Mendikute


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
9 September 2017 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AMAlberto Mendikute
Alberto Mendikute
Jose Antonio Yague FabraJose Antonio Yague Fabra
Jose Antonio Yague Fabra
MZMikel Zatarain
Mikel Zatarain
ILIbai Leizea
Ibai Leizea
Jose Antonio Yague FabraJose Antonio Yague Fabra
Jose Antonio Yague Fabra
Photogrammetry methods are being used more and more as a 3D technique for large scale metrology applications in industry. Optical targets are placed on an object and images are taken around it, where measuring traceability is provided by precise off-process pre-calibrated digital cameras and scale bars. According to the 2D target image coordinates, target 3D coordinates and camera views are jointly computed. One of the applications of photogrammetry is the measurement of raw part surfaces prior to its machining. For this application, post-process bundle adjustment has usually been adopted for computing the 3D scene. With that approach, a high computation time is observed, leading in practice to time consuming and user dependent iterative review and re-processing procedures until an adequate set of images is taken, limiting its potential for fast, easy-to-use, and precise measurements. In this paper, a new efficient procedure is presented for solving the bundle adjustment problem in portable photogrammetry. In-process bundle computing capability is demonstrated on a consumer grade desktop PC, enabling quasi real time 2D image and 3D scene computing. Additionally, a method for the self-calibration of camera and lens distortion has been integrated into the in-process approach due to its potential for highest precision when using low cost non-specialized digital cameras. Measurement traceability is set only by scale bars available in the measuring scene, avoiding the uncertainty contribution of off-process camera calibration procedures or the use of special purpose calibration artifacts. The developed self-calibrated in-process photogrammetry has been evaluated both in a pilot case scenario and in industrial scenarios for raw part measurement, showing a total in-process computing time typically below 1 s per image up to a maximum of 2 s during the last stages of the computed industrial scenes, along with a relative precision of 1/10,000 (e.g. 0.1 mm error in 1 m) with an error RMS below 0.2 pixels at image plane, ranging at the same performance reported for portable photogrammetry with precise off-process pre-calibrated cameras.

28 June 2022 in Metrology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Pablo PuertoPablo Puerto
Pablo Puerto
DHDaniel Heißelmann
Daniel Heißelmann
SMSimon Müller
Simon Müller
AMAlberto Mendikute
Alberto Mendikute
The increased relevance of large-volume metrology (LVM) in industrial applications entails certain challenges: measurements must be cost-efficient and the technologies must be easy to use while ensuring accuracy and reliability. Portable photogrammetry shows great potential to overcome such challenges, but industrial users do not yet rely on its accuracy for large scenarios (3 to 64 m), especially when mass-market cameras are not conceived of as industrial metrology instruments. Furthermore, the measurement results might also depend on the operator’s skills and knowledge of the key process variables. In this work, a methodology was designed so that the measurement uncertainty of portable photogrammetry can be evaluated under controlled conditions for LVM. To do so, PTB’s reference wall, which was designed to assess laser-based methods applied to large volumes, was used as a reference artefact to study the measurement performance under different conditions, enabling an analysis of the relative influence of two process variables: the spatial arrangement of the optical instruments on the scene, and the relative camera poses for an accurate triangulation. According to these variables, different measuring conditions were designed (Monte Carlo analysis), and experimentally evaluated and reported (LME, length measuring errors), analysing the performance figures expected from both unskilled and expert users.

14 March 2020 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Pablo PuertoPablo Puerto
Pablo Puerto
BEBeñat Estala
Beñat Estala
AMAlberto Mendikute
Alberto Mendikute
A laser triangulation system, which is composed of a camera and a laser, calculates distances between objects intersected by the laser plane. Even though there are commercial triangulation systems, developing a new system allows the design to be adapted to the needs, in addition to allowing dimensions or processing times to be optimized; however the disadvantage is that the real accuracy is not known. The aim of the research is to identify and discuss the relevance of the most significant error sources in laser triangulator systems, predicting their error contribution to the final joint measurement accuracy. Two main phases are considered in this study, namely the calibration and measurement processes. The main error sources are identified and characterized throughout both phases, and a synthetic error propagation methodology is proposed to study the measurement accuracy. As a novelty in uncertainty analysis, the present approach encompasses the covariances of correlated system variables, characterizing both phases for a laser triangulator. An experimental methodology is adopted to evaluate the measurement accuracy in a laser triangulator, comparing it with the values obtained with the synthetic error propagation methodology. The relevance of each error source is discussed, as well as the accuracy of the error propagation. A linearity value of 40 µm and maximum error of 0.6 mm are observed for a 100 mm measuring range, with the camera calibration phase being the main error contributor.

14 November 2012 in MM Science Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AMAlberto Mendikute
Alberto Mendikute
MZM. Zatarain
M. Zatarain

30 September 2008
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
RLrafael lizarralde
rafael lizarralde
JMJesús Ángel Marañón
Jesús Ángel Marañón
AMAlberto Mendikute
Alberto Mendikute
HUHarkaitz Urreta
Harkaitz Urreta