Peter Alpert

Dr. Peter Alpert

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
9 September 2015 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TWTheodore W. Wilson
Theodore W. Wilson
LLLuis Ladino
Luis Ladino
PAPeter Alpert
Peter Alpert
MBMark N. Breckels
Mark N. Breckels
IBIan M. Brooks
Ian M. Brooks
Benjamin J. MurrayBenjamin J. Murray
Benjamin J. Murray

19 January 2018 in ACS Earth and Space Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DKDaniel Alexander Knopf
Daniel Alexander Knopf
PAPeter Alpert
Peter Alpert
BWBingbing Wang
Bingbing Wang

19 December 2010 in Nature Geoscience
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DKD. A. Knopf
D. A. Knopf
PAPeter Alpert
Peter Alpert
BWB. Wang
B. Wang
JAJ. Y. Aller
J. Y. Aller

23 March 2023 in Nature Reviews Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DKDaniel A. Knopf
Daniel A. Knopf
PAPeter Alpert
Peter Alpert

24 April 2013 in Faraday Discussions
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DKDaniel A. Knopf
Daniel A. Knopf
PAPeter Alpert
Peter Alpert
Immersion freezing of water and aqueous solutions by particles acting as ice nuclei (IN) is a common process of heterogeneous ice nucleation which occurs in many environments, especially in the atmosphere where it results in the glaciation of clouds. Here we experimentally show, using a variety of IN types suspended in various aqueous solutions, that immersion freezing temperatures and kinetics can be described solely by temperature, T, and solution water activity, aw, which is the ratio of the vapour pressure of the solution and the saturation water vapour pressure under the same conditions and, in equilibrium, equivalent to relative humidity (RH). This allows the freezing point and corresponding heterogeneous ice nucleation rate coefficient, Jhet, to be uniquely expressed by T and aw, a result we term the aw based immersion freezing model (ABIFM). This method is independent of the nature of the solute and accounts for several varying parameters, including cooling rate and IN surface area, while providing a holistic description of immersion freezing and allowing prediction of freezing temperatures, Jhet, frozen fractions, ice particle production rates and numbers. Our findings are based on experimental freezing data collected for various IN surface areas, A, and cooling rates, r, of droplets variously containing marine biogenic material, two soil humic acids, four mineral dusts, and one organic monolayer acting as IN. For all investigated IN types we demonstrate that droplet freezing temperatures increase as A increases. Similarly, droplet freezing temperatures increase as the cooling rate decreases. The log10(Jhet) values for the various IN types derived exclusively by T and aw, provide a complete description of the heterogeneous ice nucleation kinetics. Thus, the ABIFM can be applied over the entire range of T, RH, total particulate surface area, and cloud activation timescales typical of atmospheric conditions. Lastly, we demonstrate that ABIFM can be used to derive frozen fractions of droplets and ice particle production for atmospheric models of cirrus and mixed phase cloud conditions.

16 June 2011 in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PAPeter Alpert
Peter Alpert
JAJ. Y. Aller
J. Y. Aller
DKD. A. Knopf
D. A. Knopf
Ice formation in the atmosphere by homogeneous and heterogeneous nucleation is one of the least understood processes in cloud microphysics and climate. Here we describe our investigation of the marine environment as a potential source of atmospheric IN by experimentally observing homogeneous ice nucleation from aqueous NaCl droplets and comparing against heterogeneous ice nucleation from aqueous NaCl droplets containing intact and fragmented diatoms. Homogeneous and heterogeneous ice nucleation are studied as a function of temperature and water activity, aw. Additional analyses are presented on the dependence of diatom surface area and aqueous volume on heterogeneous freezing temperatures, ice nucleation rates, ωhet, ice nucleation rate coefficients, Jhet, and differential and cumulative ice nuclei spectra, k(T) and K(T), respectively. Homogeneous freezing temperatures and corresponding nucleation rate coefficients are in agreement with the water activity based homogeneous ice nucleation theory within experimental and predictive uncertainties. Our results confirm, as predicted by classical nucleation theory, that a stochastic interpretation can be used to describe the homogeneous ice nucleation process. Heterogeneous ice nucleation initiated by intact and fragmented diatoms can be adequately represented by a modified water activity based ice nucleation theory. A horizontal shift in water activity, Δaw, het = 0.2303, of the ice melting curve can describe median heterogeneous freezing temperatures. Individual freezing temperatures showed no dependence on available diatom surface area and aqueous volume. Determined at median diatom freezing temperatures for aw from 0.8 to 0.99, ωhet~0.11+0.06−0.05 s−1, Jhet~1.0+1.16−0.61×104 cm−2 s−1, and K~6.2+3.5−4.1 ×104 cm−2. The experimentally derived ice nucleation rates and nuclei spectra allow us to estimate ice particle production which we subsequently use for a comparison with observed ice crystal concentrations typically found in cirrus and polar marine mixed-phase clouds. Differences in application of time-dependent and time-independent analyses to predict ice particle production are discussed.