Tamas A. Gonda

Dr. Tamas A. Gonda


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2010 in Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TGTamas A. Gonda
Tamas A. Gonda
AVAndrea Varro
Andrea Varro
TWTimothy Wang
Timothy Wang
BTBenjamin Tycko
Benjamin Tycko

24 January 2013 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YHYoku Hayakawa
Yoku Hayakawa
JFJames G. Fox
James G. Fox
TGTamas A. Gonda
Tamas A. Gonda
DWDaniel L. Worthley
Daniel L. Worthley
SMSureshkumar Muthupalani
Sureshkumar Muthupalani
TWTimothy Wang
Timothy Wang
Animal models have greatly enriched our understanding of the molecular mechanisms of numerous types of cancers. Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers worldwide, with a poor prognosis and high incidence of drug-resistance. However, most inbred strains of mice have proven resistant to gastric carcinogenesis. To establish useful models which mimic human gastric cancer phenotypes, investigators have utilized animals infected with Helicobacter species and treated with carcinogens. In addition, by exploiting genetic engineering, a variety of transgenic and knockout mouse models of gastric cancer have emerged, such as INS-GAS mice and TFF1 knockout mice. Investigators have used the combination of carcinogens and gene alteration to accelerate gastric cancer development, but rarely do mouse models show an aggressive and metastatic gastric cancer phenotype that could be relevant to preclinical studies, which may require more specific targeting of gastric progenitor cells. Here, we review current gastric carcinogenesis mouse models and provide our future perspectives on this field.

1 April 2012 in Gastroenterology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TGTamas A. Gonda
Tamas A. Gonda
YKYoung–In Kim
Young–In Kim
MSMartha C. Salas
Martha C. Salas
MGMary V. Gamble
Mary V. Gamble
WSWataru Shibata
Wataru Shibata
BTBenjamin Tycko
Benjamin Tycko

23 January 2017 in Endoscopy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SMSrihari Mahadev
Srihari Mahadev
VKVivek Kumbhari
Vivek Kumbhari
JCJosemberg M. Campos
Josemberg M. Campos
MNManoel Galvao Neto
Manoel Galvao Neto
MKMouen A. Khashab
Mouen A. Khashab
TGTamas A. Gonda
Tamas A. Gonda
Background and study aims Staple-line leaks occur in 1 % – 7 % of patients who undergo sleeve gastrectomy, and can be challenging to treat. The success of endoscopic approaches decreases as leaks develop into chronic sinus tracts. Endoscopic septotomy has been used to facilitate healing of refractory leaks by incision and enlargement of the tract to allow direct communication with the gastric lumen and internal drainage. Patients and methods We reviewed the technique and outcomes among patients who underwent endoscopic septotomy at two centers for the management of sleeve gastrectomy-associated gastric fistulas and perigastric collections refractory to occlusive endoscopic therapies. Results Nine patients underwent endoscopic septotomy at a mean of 8.6 weeks after leak diagnosis, following failure of percutaneous and conventional endoscopic modalities. Perigastric collections ranged from 3 cm to 10 cm in size. The mean procedure time for endoscopic septotomy was 87.2 minutes. Multiple endoscopic septotomy procedures (mean 2.3, range 1 – 4) were required to achieve radiological resolution. The mean follow-up period was 21.2 weeks, and all nine patients achieved symptom resolution without the need for surgery. Bleeding at the time of endoscopic septotomy occurred in three patients, and was managed with endoscopic clips and did not require transfusion. No other adverse events or delayed complications were recorded. Conclusions Endoscopic septotomy appears to be a safe and effective technique for the management of sleeve gastrectomy-associated fistulae and collections, including those refractory to other endoscopic and percutaneous methods. * These authors contributed equally to this work.

1 September 2017 in Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MXMing-Ming Xu
Ming-Ming Xu
SYShi Yin
Shi Yin
ASAli A. Siddiqui
Ali A. Siddiqui
RSRonald R. Salem
Ronald R. Salem
BSBeth Schrope
Beth Schrope
TGTamas A. Gonda
Tamas A. Gonda
Asymptomatic pancreatic cysts are a common clinical problem but only a minority of these cases progress to cancer. Our aim was to compare the accuracy to detect malignancy of the 2015 American Gastroenterological Association (AGA), the 2012 International Consensus/Fukuoka (Fukuoka guidelines [FG]), and the 2010 American College of Radiology (ACR) guidelines. We conducted a retrospective study at 3 referral centers for all patients who underwent resection for an asymptomatic pancreatic cyst between January 2008 and December 2013. We compared the accuracy of 3 guidelines in predicting high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or cancer in resected cysts. We performed logistic regression analyses to examine the association between cyst features and risk of HGD or cancer. A total of 269 patients met inclusion criteria. A total of 228 (84.8%) had a benign diagnosis or low-grade dysplasia on surgical pathology, and 41 patients (15.2%) had either HGD (n = 14) or invasive cancer (n = 27). Of the 41 patients with HGD or cancer on resection, only 3 patients would have met the AGA guideline's indications for resection based on the preoperative cyst characteristics, whereas 30/41 patients would have met the FG criteria for resection and 22/41 patients met the ACR criteria. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value of HGD, and/or cancer of the AGA guidelines were 7.3%, 88.2%, 10%, and 84.1%, compared to 73.2%, 45.6%, 19.5%, and 90.4% for the FG and 53.7%, 61%, 19.8%, and 88% for the ACR guidelines. In multivariable analysis, cyst size >3 cm, compared to ≤3 cm, (odds ratio [OR] = 2.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.11, 4.2) and each year increase in age (OR = 1.07, 95% CI = 1.03, 1.11) were positively associated with risk of HGD or cancer on resection. In patients with asymptomatic branch duct-intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms or mucinous cystic neoplasms who underwent resection, the prevalence rate of HGD or cancer was 15.2%. Using the 2015 AGA criteria for resection would have missed 92.6% of patients with HGD or cancer. The more “inclusive” FG and ACR had a higher sensitivity for HGD or cancer but lower specificity. Given the current deficiencies of these guidelines, it will be important to determine the acceptable rate of false-positives in order to prevent a single true-positive.

14 August 2020 in Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TGTamas A. Gonda
Tamas A. Gonda
JFJarwei Fang
Jarwei Fang
MSMartha Salas
Martha Salas
CDCatherine Do
Catherine Do
EHEmily Hsu
Emily Hsu
BTBenjamin Tycko
Benjamin Tycko
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a lethal cancer that has proven refractory to immunotherapy. Previously, treatment with the DNA hypomethylating drug decitabine (5-aza-dC; DAC) extended survival in the KPC-Brca1 mouse model of PDAC. Here we investigated the effects of DAC in the original KPC model and tested combination therapy with DAC followed by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Four protocols were tested: PBS vehicle, DAC, ICI (anti-PD-1 or anti-VISTA), and DAC followed by ICI. For each single-agent and combination treatment, tumor growth was measured by serial ultrasound, tumor-infiltrating lymphoid and myeloid cells were characterized, and overall survival was assessed. Single-agent DAC led to increased CD4+ and CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL), PD1 expression, and tumor necrosis while slowing tumor growth and modestly increasing mouse survival without systemic toxicity. RNA-sequencing of DAC-treated tumors revealed increased expression of Chi3l3 (Ym1), reflecting an increase in a subset of tumor-infiltrating M2-polarized macrophages. While ICI alone had modest effects, DAC followed by either of ICI therapies additively inhibited tumor growth and prolonged mouse survival. The best results were obtained using DAC followed by anti-PD-1, which extended mean survival from 26 to 54 days (P < 0.0001). In summary, low-dose DAC inhibits tumor growth and increases both TILs and a subset of tumor-infiltrating M2-polarized macrophages in the KPC model of PDAC, and DAC followed by anti-PD-1 substantially prolongs survival. Because M2-polarized macrophages are predicted to antagonize antitumor effects, targeting these cells may be important to enhance the efficacy of combination therapy with DAC plus ICI. Significance: In a pancreatic cancer model, a DNA hypomethylating drug increases tumor-infiltrating effector T cells, increases a subset of M2 macrophages, and significantly prolongs survival in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors. See related commentary by Nephew, p. 4610